Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Spotlight:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Canada as a Constitutional Monarchy
» What is a Governor General?
» What is a Speech from the Throne?
» Highlights of the 2002 Throne Speech
» Assessments and Responses
 
More Information
« Parliament Procedure
« Who's Who in the House
 
External Links & Info
« Governor General Site
« Speech Full Text
« Privy Council Office
 

Assessment and Responses to the 2002 Throne Speech

General Assessment of the Throne Speech

When assessing the 2002 Throne Speech, one should keep several points in mind:

  • Activist government program: This throne speech portrays a much more activist federal government in social policy. It has been characterized as Jean Chretien’s legacy and a return to “left” liberalism with increased government involvement and spending on social issues such as health care, poverty, the environment, and Aboriginal policy.
  • Military and taxes not addressed: The throne speech leaves out several issues. Two of the most important include the Canadian military and tax reduction. The absence of these issues signals that they will not be priorities for the government over the next year.
  • Long-term commitment of the government: This throne speech is Jean Chretien’s vision for Canada. However, he will be stepping down and Canada will have a new Prime Minister within the next two years. This change in leadership may result in new priorities for the federal government, and many of the commitments made in this year’s throne speech may be discarded or become less important.

Responses to the Throne Speech

Immediately following the Throne Speech, opposition parties were highly critical of the speech and its vision for Canada.

  • Canadian Alliance Party: Canadian Alliance Leader Stephen Harper was critical of the Throne Speech for its lack of specifics. Harper also criticized the government for committing to the Kyoto accord to cut greenhouse gases and more government spending (when it should be concentrating on cutting taxes).
    Canadian Alliance Official Response to the 2002 Throne Speech
  • New Democratic Party of Canada: New Democratic Party Leader Alexa McDonough asserted that the contents of the speech were recycled (she emphasized this point by carrying a blue recycling box into the Senate during the speech). The NDP was pleased with the Liberal’s more activist agenda, but doubted that the government would actually back the agenda with money.
    NDP Official Response to the 2002 Throne Speech
  • Progressive Conservative Party of Canada: PC leader Joe Clark asserted that the Throne Speech offered nothing new. Further, the PC Party stated that the speech as essentially a “work of fiction” and that Canadians should not expect the government to stick to its commitments. As Clark stated, “Judging by the last two Throne Speeches, we can expect only 25% of the promises we hear on Monday to be taken seriously by the government.”
    PC Party Response to the 2002 Throne Speech

 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007