Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Spotlight:
spacer
Table of Contents
The Main Event
The Current Event
What's What
The Facts You Need to Know
Who's Who
The People You Need to Know
Deeper Still
Dig Deeper Into the Issues
In-Quiz-ition
Test your Knowledge
Lets Talk
Conversational

Fortress North America
Printable Version
 

THE MAIN EVENT

Since the events of September 11, many in the United States have pointed to Canada as the weakest link in North American security against terrorism. Last week action was taken as the United States President George W. Bush and the United States Senate called for the harmonization of American, Canadian and Mexican customs and immigration policies to create a North American security perimeter or “Fortress North America.”

Canadian authorities have been cool to the concept of Fortress North America, seeing it as a violation of Canadian sovereignty. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien has said that Canada will not give up its control over immigration. Canadian Revenue Minister Martin Cauchon
He Said, She Said

"Let there not be any misunderstanding, Canadian laws will be made right here in Canadian Parliament." 
Elinor Caplan, 
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada
said the government was only in favour of harmonizing customs policy when it came to common technological projects at the border. Furthermore, the Canadian government has stressed that it has already taken steps to tighten security in Canada against terrorist activities. These steps include the introduction of stiff anti-terrorism legislation (Bill C-36), tighter immigration legislation (Bill C-11), and the investment of millions of dollars in new border and immigration technology and officers. 

However, these steps by the Canadian government may not lessen harmonization demands by the United States. Furthermore, some opposition politicians in Canada have been receptive to the idea of Fortress North America. As Canadian Alliance Member of Parliament stated in the House of Commons, “Will the [Revenue] minister stop this political posturing and for once act in the best interest of Canadians by agreeing to President Bush's proposal?"
Learn More About The United States Push For Fortress North America
Read More About the Canadian Governments Reaction to Fortress North America


<% include ("/home2/maplelea/HTML/includes/education/edu_sub_footer.html"); %>
 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007