Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.
Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments
|
|
|
Backgrounder on Canadian SubmarinesCanada’s Submarine PolicyThe Canadian Navy, over the years, has consistently argued for a substantial submarine element in the Canadian fleet. According to the Navy, submarines are necessary, both for the purposes of preserving domestic security, and for international operations. On the home front, in the view of the Navy, Canada’s submarine fleet has a key role to play in protecting the country’s interests. This role includes:
On the international stage, in the view of the Navy, a submarine fleet is crucial for the role it plays in:
The 1998 Submarine PurchasePrior to 1998 the submarine fleet of the Canadian Navy consisted of three ‘Oberon-class’ submarines – the HMCS Ojibwa, the HMCS Onondaga, and the HMCS Okanagan These submarines were purchased from the British Navy in 1965; at that time, they were ‘state of the art’ vessels. The Canadian Navy purchased two more Oberon-class subs from the British (one for training and another for spare parts), in addition to leasing a submarine from the American Navy in 1968 – the HMCS Rainbow – which was subsequently decommissioned in 1974. In the late 1980s, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney proposed the addition of a fleet of 10-12 nuclear-powered submarines, given that the HMCS Ojibwa, the HMCS Okanagan, and the HMCS Onondaga were nearing the end of their useful lives. A key objective in making the pitch for 10-12 subs: to provide Canada with a ‘three-ocean’ navy and the capacity to its assert sovereignty in the Arctic. The Mulroney government, however, was forced to cancel the initiative in 1989 given the poor economic climate of the day; the costs involved in purchasing such an advanced fleet of submarines were simply too great. After the Liberals, led by Jean Chrétien, assumed government, they implemented a strict deficit reduction strategy that resulted in severe cuts to the defence budget. As a consequence, the Navy was left without any resources to replace its aging Oberon-class submarines. In 1998, however, another opportunity came about that would seemingly
allow Canada to replace its aging submarine fleet in a relatively
cost-effective manner. At that time the Canadian Navy negotiated
a deal with the British Navy to lease four diesel-powered ‘Victoria-class
long-range patrol’ submarines. These submarines had been
built by the British Navy in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
but had remained unused since 1994 as Britain decided it would
only maintain its fleet of nuclear submarines. As buying four
new non-nuclear submarines would have cost the Canadian Navy
approximately $3 to $5 billion CDN total, being able to
lease the four used submarines from the British Navy for approximately
$800 million CDN was a relative ‘steal.’ With its
agreement to lease, the Canadian Navy also received training
simulators and training support, as well as spare parts for the
submarines. Furthermore, as the submarines were in storage for
four years, they needed to undergo servicing and testing to ensure
their readiness for service. Under the package negotiated by
the Canadian Navy, the British were responsible for such servicing
and testing.The four boats were named the HMCS Victoria, the
HMCS Windsor, the HMCS Corner Brook, and the HMCS Chicoutimi. ‘Victoria-class’ Submarine Quick Facts
Other useful facts:
For More Information on the Victoria-class Submarines, visit the web site of the Canadian Navy Past Submarine IncidentsThe fire onboard the HMCS Chicoutimi is only the latest in a series of problems the Canadian Navy has encountered with each of the submarines it leased as part of its 1998 deal with the British Navy. Among these other problems:
In addition to the various technical difficulties the Canadian Navy
has encountered with these vessels, it has also had to bear an
unexpected cost burden. Next >>
|
|
© 2001-2006 Maple
Leaf Web. |