Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Voter Almanac
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Historical Background
» Political Party Profiles
» Party Leader Profiles
» The Major Issues
» The Political Campaign
» Election Results
» Historical Significance
» Links & Further Reading
 
More Information
« Voter Almanac
 
External Info & Links
« Elections Canada
« Primeministers.ca
 

Historical Significance

The significance of this election can be summarized in two words: free trade

The Single-Issue Election

One of the central issues in Canadian history has been the country’s trade relationship with the United States. The 1988 election is remembered for the passionate debate over the issue and the outcome. The election saw an intense debate, involving political parties, corporations, unions, and a variety of other actors. The debate touched issues of the very nature of Canadian nationhood and sovereignty. During the campaign, there was significant movement of public opinion about the agreement, the parties, and the leaders. In the end, the Conservatives and their trade agreement prevailed. Although a majority of Canadians voted for parties that opposed the agreement, the Conservatives won the most seats and the country made the historic decision to enter into a free trade agreement with the United States. The debate over the issue and globalization in general continues, but the 1988 election stands as a critical point in the Canadian debate.

The issues that weren’t discussed

The emphasis on the single issue meant that a number of other pressing issues were ignored in the campaign. The Conservatives were proposing to change Canada’s taxation system to implement a value added tax. This would eventually become the hated Goods and Services Tax that became a critical issue in 1990. Even more important was the failure of voters and political parties to debate the merits of the Meech Lake Accord. The Accord was relatively new, complicated, and none of the three parties saw much gain in making it a campaign issue. Still, the Meech Lake Accord began a constitutional journey that led to the Charlottetown Accord referendum in 1992, and culminated in the 1995 Quebec referendum on sovereignty.

The Reform party

The attention paid to free trade also made it easy to overlook a development in western Canada – the emergence of a small party called the Reform party. The party didn’t fare particularly well, doing best in Alberta with 15% of the vote there. Western Canadians had long supported free trade and the dominance of that issue ensured that they would stay in the Conservative coalition for another election. The erosion of support to Reform in the West, though, foreshadowed the fact that the Conservatives were in the process of losing their support of one of the two critical elements of their Quebec-West coalition.

For more information:

Next >>
Links and Further Information


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007