Asymmetrical federalism Does it work-is it fair?
#1
Posted 29 October 2005 - 02:27 AM
I think there is to much secrecy involved in the concept of assymetrical federalism and seems to be nothing more than a federal blank cheque to give to provinces to support unaffordable provincial aspirations.
The problem with this is who is in the rightful federal positon to decide who get's what and under what terms.
This it appears is nothing more than an extension of the banana repulic the Liberals have turned Canada into. No accountably with taxpayers money and no fairness applied to ensure each province gets what the other receives.
http://cnews.canoe.c...1283196-cp.html
#2
Posted 29 October 2005 - 02:39 AM
Leafless, on Oct 29 2005, 12:59 PM, said:
Banana republic????
#3
Posted 29 October 2005 - 04:20 AM
#4
Posted 29 October 2005 - 04:26 AM
So before i offer any more comments or blanket statements, what exactly is Bernard Lord asking for? I would hate to label our governement as authoritarian or assymetrical before I evaluate the facts.
#5
Posted 29 October 2005 - 06:02 AM
Leafless, on Oct 29 2005, 11:59 AM, said:
I think there is to much secrecy involved in the concept of assymetrical federalism and seems to be nothing more than a federal blank cheque to give to provinces to support unaffordable provincial aspirations.
The problem with this is who is in the rightful federal positon to decide who get's what and under what terms.
This it appears is nothing more than an extension of the banana repulic the Liberals have turned Canada into. No accountably with taxpayers money and no fairness applied to ensure each province gets what the other receives.
http://cnews.canoe.c...1283196-cp.html
Quebec's Charest government has been pushing asymmetrical federalism more than any other Quebec premier (and, as far as I read, more than any premier in terms of looking at sovereignty vs. asymmetrical federalism).
Of course, Martin would want to give credence to asymmetrical federalism in Quebec more than any other province because Quebec is the only province that seriously threatens confederation at this time.
Does it work? That is a question that has yet to be answered. I think we need to see more of it in action before we can pass judgment.
-Alexander Hamilton
#6
Posted 29 October 2005 - 06:07 AM
Quote
hehehe..dude..have you been to Alberta lately? Seperation has become part of our daily dialogue..
#7
Posted 29 October 2005 - 06:49 AM
Semperfi_dani, on Oct 29 2005, 05:09 PM, said:
I've lived in Alberta for over 20 years and I can tell you that the only place seperation is part of daily dialogue is on AM radio.
#8
Posted 29 October 2005 - 06:55 AM
Quote
You and I must live in different Alberta's than
#9
Posted 29 October 2005 - 07:07 AM
Semperfi_dani, on Oct 29 2005, 05:57 PM, said:
I hear it once in a while. But then, I hear more positive talk in Alberta of reducing or shutting down energy exports to the US than I hear positive talk of Alberta seperation.
Quote
Klein...pffft. He knows very well that without a federal government to scapegoat, he'd be chewed up and spat out by the Alberta electorate in no time.
#10
Posted 29 October 2005 - 07:15 AM
Quote
Oh for sure..me too. If that time ever came to be, i'd move out of Alberta!
But you hear that old "lets seperate" by whining old guard conservatives who, when they don't get their own way, threaten to seperate. Hell, most Albertans ignore them too!
Quote
Amen sistah.
#12
Posted 29 October 2005 - 07:33 AM
Quote
"Call me crazy, but I think they [Iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
#13
Posted 29 October 2005 - 07:38 AM
Quote
I think that what we are referring to is the pipeline that is being built towards BC to attract Chinese and other asian companies. The US will always be our biggest customer, but fiscally, it makes sense to diversify to asian markets who have the strongest economy. I think some economic forcasters expect Asia to be our largest customer base in years time, but i doubt that..because the US is the biggest energy consumptions...
But if they are successful in building the pipelines in Alaska, their demand on Alberta's energy resources will decrease.
There, i've nerded out.
#14
Posted 29 October 2005 - 08:08 AM
PocketRocket, on Oct 29 2005, 02:11 PM, said:
Leafless, on Oct 29 2005, 12:59 PM, said:
Banana republic????
Yes I have heard in other formats Canada being referred to as nothing but a Banana republic, and I must say I agree with that statement. What do we expect when we continue to send a government to Ottawa who has shown every Canadian that they cannot be trusted with taxpayer's money. They lie, they steal, the defraud, they are corrupt, in fact they give new meaning to the term corrupt, and they take it to a whole new meaning. People demonize Stephen Harper as being scary when he has never had a chance to either prove or disprove that contention, and they instead go to the polls and elected again to power the most corrupt group of politicians this country has ever seen.
I don't get it, we continue to piss and moan about things like Sponsorship Program, HRDC missing $ Millions, and other instances of corruption and outright theft, yet the people of Ontario and the Maritimes send representative of the Liberla Party right back to Ottawa to continue pillaging the National Treasury. When is enough going to be enough? I'm sure I don't have the answer to that one.
#15
Posted 29 October 2005 - 06:06 PM
Semperfi_dani, on Oct 29 2005, 03:39 PM, said:
Quote
hehehe..dude..have you been to Alberta lately? Seperation has become part of our daily dialogue..
Hey,
When your Alberta Alliance Party gets double-digit number of seats I'll believe it. The PQ has around 44 seats here and can conceivably form the next government...but if any other province is seriously inferring separation I'll take Alberta...
-Alexander Hamilton

Add Reply

MultiQuote