Canadian Forces Recruiting ads Fight ...
#1
Posted 12 March 2007 - 08:40 AM
I think they are fantastic ads. They are forceful and state clearly a purpose you can be proud of doing in the forces, but they don't gussy it up with chrome and flags. I think these ads will appeal strongly to the right kind of recruits. Whoever is responsible for them has done a good job.
#2
Posted 12 March 2007 - 08:49 AM
Figleaf, on Mar 12 2007, 09:12 AM, said:
100% agreed.
#5
Posted 12 March 2007 - 09:49 AM
Figleaf, on Mar 12 2007, 08:12 AM, said:
I think they are fantastic ads. They are forceful and state clearly a purpose you can be proud of doing in the forces, but they don't gussy it up with chrome and flags. I think these ads will appeal strongly to the right kind of recruits. Whoever is responsible for them has done a good job.
If you signed up, then yes, the ads are good.
But if you didn't sign up, then you are in no position to praise the ads (indeed you are suggesting the ads don't work very well).
The ads ought to be judged on 'sign-up metrics' or not at all.
One thing you can be certain of, even if the ads do not work at all, the ad agency will get paid and they will pad their expenses by 250% and the contract will be renewed. The government committee that authorised the ads, regardless of the effectiveness of the ads, will get bonuses and promotions.
Good ads, bad ads, what's the difference? They all get raises and promotions and that's all that really matters here.
Btw, did you know that the Canadian Armed Forces has the highest ratio of General officers to non-General officers in the western world? Figures.
#6
Posted 12 March 2007 - 09:56 AM
Mad_Michael, on Mar 12 2007, 09:21 AM, said:
Figleaf, on Mar 12 2007, 08:12 AM, said:
I think they are fantastic ads. They are forceful and state clearly a purpose you can be proud of doing in the forces, but they don't gussy it up with chrome and flags. I think these ads will appeal strongly to the right kind of recruits. Whoever is responsible for them has done a good job.
If you signed up, then yes, the ads are good.
But if you didn't sign up, then you are in no position to praise the ads (indeed you are suggesting the ads don't work very well).
Ease up, amigo. The ads are targetted quite deliberately at a different demographic than me.
Quote
You will note that attracting recruits was a key element of my analysis. Still, I think there are other ways that can be used to judge something, dpending on what you want to judge.
Quote
Yes, I had heard that. It's not especially laudable, but it is partly explained by the demographic effects of sharply shrinking the overall size of the forces from 1945 onward.
#7
Posted 12 March 2007 - 10:04 AM
#9
Posted 12 March 2007 - 10:38 AM
Mad_Michael, on Mar 12 2007, 10:21 AM, said:
Figleaf, on Mar 12 2007, 08:12 AM, said:
I think these ads will appeal strongly to the right kind of recruits.
Btw, did you know that the Canadian Armed Forces has the highest ratio of General officers to non-General officers in the western world? Figures.
What is fighting fear? What is fighting distress? What is fighting chaos? What are the "right" kind of recruits?
How does one fight fear? How does one fight distress? How does one fight chaos? Are they fighting for it, or against it?
Fighting creats fear, fighting creats distress, fighting creates chaos, so in truth our military would be creating the things the ad says fight. So then in truth it would be:
Fight for Fear, Fight for Distress, Fight for Chaos. Fight for the Canadian Armed Forces.
These ads smack of the disasterous fight comments of the CPC's 2005 election campaign revamped for the Canadian military recruitment campaign. So, maybe they will target the "right" type of people.
Well, quite clearly, we gotta have more enlisted men readily available to give up their lives for all those officers just waiting for enlisted men to command. Then we gotta find some fear that need fighting, some distress that needs fighting, and some chaos that needs fighting, just so we can ad to it, and create more.
#10
Posted 12 March 2007 - 10:57 AM
Catchme, on Mar 12 2007, 11:10 AM, said:
Are you referring to the distrasous Liberal campaign ads that tried to misrepresent the Conservative plan to have garrisons based near major centres? "Soldiers with Guns in our streets."
Your response goes to show the depth to which those who hate the Goverment will stoop. We need more recruits. These ads are well-produced and directed at the right target audience. Anybody attacking the Government over them will never agree with anything a Conservative Goverment would do...
#11
Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:06 AM
Quote
How does one fight fear? How does one fight distress? How does one fight chaos? Are they fighting for it, or against it?
Fighting creats fear, fighting creats distress, fighting creates chaos, so in truth our military would be creating the things the ad says fight. So then in truth it would be:
Fight for Fear, Fight for Distress, Fight for Chaos. Fight for the Canadian Armed Forces.
Walk into your local Legion and tell that to the WW2 and Korean vets.
#12
Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:11 AM
Quote
You have a source for that gem, Although it is true that we do have a high number of general officers we are far for the highest, check italy's for one.
#13
Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:33 AM
Catchme, on Mar 12 2007, 10:10 AM, said:
How does one fight fear? How does one fight distress? How does one fight chaos? Are they fighting for it, or against it?
You ask those questions as if you think they have no answer, but in fact they do. Ways that the forces fight fear, distress, and chaos are exemplified in the ad.
The right kind of recruit is a person with altruistic motivations and sound ethics coupled with a kick ass attitude, an appreciation for heirachical organization, and a strong propensity for groups and teams.
Quote
I'm afraid I don't find this sort of sloganeering very persuasive. It's a simplistic sort of moral relativism that fails to acknowledge that resistance to injustice is just.
Quote
I believe I heard somewhere that in modern warfare it is, per capita, the junior officers who bear the highest casualty rate.
#14
Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:39 AM
Quote
It does'nt get any flatter, or greasier than that, no where did they promise a vaction spot on some beach gocking at all the babes, instead they promised you a hard life, doing one of the worlds most dangrous jobs, serving our great nation in it's armed forces. And if you did'nt see that watch it again.

Add Reply

MultiQuote