Jump to content
Political Forums
  • Announcements

    • Greg

      New Members Please Read   10/07/2016

      New forum members should review the Forum Rules and GuidelinesĀ before contributing to the discussion forums.

xul

Members
  • Content count

    734
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

About xul

  • Rank
    Full Member
  • Birthday 10/30/1963

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. For sake of the lives of those Indian soldiers, I wish she did have a plan and did not talk in sleep. Border stand-off with China can be resolved through talks: India China has clearly signalled India in last 24 hours: time is ticking. withdraw your troops or prepare to be forcefully withdrawn. Withdraw Troops From Doklam If You Cherish Peace: China Tells India In some Chinese military fan boy's forum, there is a joke: Indian government has given orders to its soldiers: If China begins to withdraw its soldier for preparing open fire, Indian soldiers should run back to Indian border (only 180m away from the site) immediately before Chinese could make enough distance for engagement. Then Indian government will declare that India has win the stand-off because China has withdrawn its troops first.
  2. The incident happened at 2:30 am, so the visual might not be dependable. The photo shows that the deck of ACX Cystal was piled with containers which might block its radar beam, so its captain might not see USS Fitzgerald on its radar screen. Even if the capation had seen USS Fitzgerald, since it came from ACX Cystal port side (according the damage area on both ships), he would reasonably assume that USS Fitzgerald would yield to his ship's course. But what was the story of USS Fitzgerald? Hardly could believe that its radar couldn't find a 29000 ton cargo ship. So maybe this is a real version of the story of US Navy vs Lighthouse? US sailors missing after Navy destroyer collision off Japan
  3. It's good news to the fans of wars. It may indicate that Kim has determined to keep his nuke at all cost. Or maybe it's good news for the fans of peace. The vent from Kim may indicate: 1. It seems like that the recent action of China (halt importing coal from NK and threaten to cut off NK's oil supply ) has hurted him badly and forced him to halt(at least temporarily) the most anticipated new nuke test on his grandfather's birthday. 2. Kim may want to convince NK people that the failure of his blackmail to US is caused by the betrayal of China, so the invincible image of their great leader won't be tarnished. 3. or maybe it's his strategy to blackmail as more as possible before giving up his nuke.
  4. But don't get too excited----he has just opened fire against China with mouth cannon North Korea threatens 'grave consequences' for China in rare criticism of neighbour
  5. I'm not sure which continent emits most, but I know that Antarctica emits least since no man lives there.
  6. I hate to draw BC back from his..sorry, I have just noticed BC is a female....her glorious WW2 war dreams. But I have to mention that, in recent years, US used to "finish" the wars it started by this way:
  7. Oil would go up if the war broke out among those oil producers in the Middle East. Almost all parties which would be involved or affected by the war against DPRK, like US, Japan, SK, China...are oil consumers. The oil price would go down if the perspective of their economic growth was affected by the war. Only the price of LG OLED TV in Best Buy would go up...if anybody plans to upgrade his home theatre, be sure to do it before the war begins.
  8. North korea

    From this photo, I seems like in DPRK nobody dare to tell the truth to the fat boy. It will be a problem
  9. North korea

    Because US is the only country which can match DPRK on mouth cannon in the world. Official: White House, Pentagon miscommunicated on aircraft carrier's location Kim's faked ICBM vs Trump's faked armada, war fans watch two most peace loving countries in the world warred on Twitter and YouTube. 1 week ago Now
  10. North korea

    If your president and his generals shared as the same confident as yours, the attack would have already begun. He was there, just a few hours ago, in front of about 100 foreign journalists and reporters, so it isn't some top secret which US didn't know. One cruise missile would finish him if Trump wanted.
  11. North korea

    These hardwares are so inferior that they capsized just by one kick from ISIS..
  12. North korea

    Kim threatens to attack S.K., Japan or USA if DPRK is attacked by US.. As for the difference between Clinton's and Bush's policy: After American citizen Saddam robbed a bank, he was pursued by police officer Clinton and shot at butt; Years later after Mr. Saddam was released from prison, he went to bank to save his own money which he earned as American prisoner worker. "Why should these second class Amercian citizen allow to stay alive meanwhile our first class citizens have to pay tax to feed them?"Police officer Bush thought. So officer Bush shorted to crowd "he is robbing a bank" then shot Saddam at head and killed him. When officer Bush was bought before judge, his defense lawyer BC2004 made a strong defense for him,"Clinton also shot Saddam before. Why only Bush was accused...?" Judge: Saddam's life also matters....if he was killed for the crime he didn't committed
  13. North korea

    If any one who read the WikI article of the Six Part Talks which I posted a link above, he or she will find that in July 20, 2007, as the result of the 2nd phase of the 6th round of the Six Party Talks, a diplomatic solution had already been reached. It was US, exactly it was Bush administration, which abandoned the diplomatic resort. Someone may argue that Bush administration alleged that DPRK didn't send in a complete list of required information. But we should notice that Bush used the same strategy---falsely accusing Saddam hiding nuke material---to fuel his war plan. If anyone who is truly objective, he or she should agree, even DPRK fulfills its obligation in the agreement, Bush will still not fulfill US part of the agreement which signed by Clinton administration because Bush administration had no intention to do so. Bush and Obama administration's mistake, is that they wanted to use the nuke issue to overthrow DPRK regime, which China and Russia didn't want to. I think Bush hoped if he was success on the wars in the Middle East, he would have resorts to force China and Russia to recede from their stands. But since he failed, it gave DPRK a chance and time to develop its nuclear ability. It seems like Trump has eventually gone back to Clinton administrative's way to seek a diplomatic solution so there is still hope for solving the problem peacefully. On the other hand, since his nuke technology progress in recent years, Kim may overestimate his strength and underestimate US's, which may resort a war. For military option, if US had a way to drop a bomb directly at Kim's head, it would resolve the problem immediately and everyone would happy, include China, Russia and even most of Kim's generals because everyone has kinda been tried of him. The problem is that there isn't a certain way to kill him with one strike. If the beheading operation fails, S.Korea and Trump administration has to consider how to deal with Kim's possible retaliation. Even if he was killed in one strike, some his loyalist and frantics in DPRK military would still take action against S.Korea or even Japan to retaliate for his death. The economic consequence will be too severe to be neglected.
  14. North korea

    I have just got an idea for a peace solution----Just let Kim and Trump exchange their roles. I mean, making Kim the King of US and Trump the King of DPRK. The advantage of the solution: 1. US 1) Since there are far more enough Nukes in warehouses of the Pentagon, Kim may not want any more; 2) I think everyone was impressed by the graph of US debt. I'm sure King Kim was the most suitable person in the world to solve the problem.... by kicking greedy CEOs and bankers asses, disbanding unions, fixing Obama Care by setting doctors's salary at $0.1/per hour and lashing the rest of Americans to make them working harder in Walmart American factories instead of made-in-China and Mexico illegal immigrant workers ... 3) All Americans will love their new King for his famous (or notorious from the point of view of the rest of the world) Military First Policy and American will no longer need to spend their own money to buy their guns because King Kim will give every of them a gun free of charge like what he did in DPRK. 2. DPRK 1) King Trump will no longer be bothered by unfriendly TV and newspapers. Movie stars like J-Law will be looking for any chance to meet King Trump in a ball to express their will to be his mistress. The FBI-kind will only investigate his opposite not the King himself and there will be no court daring to put a stop on King Trump administrative decree 2. The Trump Organization will build more and higher skyscrapers and border walls than Kim to make DPRK people feeling that DPRK will be great again 3) All DPRK women will be fall into immense happiness for their new king has hobby of putting his hands on their butts.. So, it will be a win-win solution
×