Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums
  • Announcements

    • Greg

      New Members Please Read   10/07/2016

      New forum members should review the Forum Rules and Guidelines before contributing to the discussion forums.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by xul

  1. Watch my video. 100% satisfaction guarantee----Nuclear War awaits
  2. If I was you I would advise Canadian Liberal PM Justin Trudeau sending liberal Canadians to Mali and any place like that instead of peacekeepers, armed forces, nuke launchers... The benefits: 2. The liberals can try to lecture their political-correct doctrines to ISIS to covert them to Canadianized moderate ISIS 1. There will be no liberal Canadian existing on the planet earth soon, so the war loving conservative dudes will dominate Canada and do whatever they want---which means---no limits on defense spending...
  3. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Trade war is also a war....how about this one?
  4. War enthusiasts, come in please

    No. I only use Google Translate to find what Tolstoï means in English since I can't read French.
  5. War enthusiasts, come in please

    "People" have never had and will never have the right to choose to fight in some wars until their asses are blasted and exerted with enough pain by their enemies. I'm afraid this is true human nature. You kept asking me what was the meaning of the video. Now I can give you one: In my video, at 2:40, did the people who cheered when President Trump announced America had sent fleet to defend Binomo aware that Putin would nuke their asses and end their happiness once and for all? Obviously they didn't. They just thought Putin would turn back before American naval forces since Russia had nothing to match it in the sea, so Americans would feel their nation great again like what they felt in Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. In most cases, people go into a war without knowing that they are going into a war, or what kind war they are going into. Its kinda like the video below----people think they have ordered snack but get a snake instead... Did the lady choose the soup which she ordered at 1:28 in the video?
  6. War enthusiasts, come in please

    I think there wasn't any "Canadian soldier" in the Seven Years War unless you were referring aboriginal. In North America, English, French or Spanish soldiers fought for Britain, France or Spain respectively then. Since there wasn't enough population in North America then, it was impossible to draw soldiers to reinforce Europe. Exactly both Britain and France had to send reinforcement to North America from Europe. After French navy was defeated by British Navy, it was impossible for France to send reinforcement to its North American colony, then France lost its New France to Britain.
  7. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Thank you for the recommendation. I'll read it if I find the book. I think a serious history book is quite different from a historical novel, even if the novel was written by Tolstoy. If you read a novel, regardless it is a historical novel or a Sic-Fi, usually you will find a "Dark Lord" or something like that in the book to play bad guy. Then you will find a hero, or a good side to fight this dark side. And you usually have 90% chance to have a "justice will prevail" ending to satisfy reader's psychological needs---This is the way the writers to sell their books. But if you read some serious history books, you will find that the historians used to be prudent to judge which side is good or evil because in the real world the causes of a war and the motives of people into a war are always complex. If you compare the size and population of Axis countries to the size and population of Allies countries, you could hardly conclude that the Allies's victory is because Allies had better soldiers. If you put aside political correctness aka prejudice, you have to admit that the individual soldiers of Axis were the better one in terms of combat technique or even on bravery and sprite, because in most cases they had to fight the enemies which outnumbered and outgunned them.
  8. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Those German and Japanese soldiers probably died because they didn't have money to hire a good doctor to treat their bone spurs in their heels.... As for Canadian soldiers, maybe those you knew did join in the war for king and country, but I guess lots of others were just in for not having money to hire a good doctor either. This is why Canada need to introduce conscription in 1944. Besides, Canada only sent a few divisions into the war, so it was easy to find some fan boys to volunteer. If Canada needed hundreds of divisions and millions would die in the war like Germany and Japan, you would find that Canada would even have fewer volunteers than German and Japanese.
  9. War enthusiasts, come in please

    I think the sense of humor depends more on an individual itself than which cultural the individual belongs. If you watch this video and read the comments under the video on YouTube, you will find that the Canadian PM may think he is fanny and cool, but obviously most of his countrymen do not share the same feeling with him. And if you try to find some Indians who applause to the Canadian PM on internet, you will be disappointed. I think most Indians share the same feeling with most Canadian---they don't think a PM acting like a jester or clown fanny, though their culture is quite different with Canadian.
  10. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Great! U.S. Navy has joined the fake news party. SOUTH CHINA SEA (Feb. 10, 2018) Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Wayne E. Meyer Beside the photo, the website noted: The only problem is, the ship in the photo isn't an Arleigh Burke-Class destroyer. It is a PLA Navy type 052D destroyer So, it seems like an U.S. navy officer could not distinguish an U.S. Navy destroyer with a Chinese one. But as a fan of photography, I think his photo is qualified to be a work of art, so I put it here.
  11. War enthusiasts, come in please

    My post in on the section of this forum which is entitled "Arts and Culture". As for arts, it is nothing wrong if you create something which is inscrutable for someone or everyone, like this: "Inscrutable" also means everyone can interpret a work of art by his or her won way, no need to care about the creator's original meaning or purpose. So you do can say anything in this "thread" and the "" means there wasn't a certain "thread" or purpose in my mind when I post the video. For example: If our war loving fan Conservative Dude's twin sister Liberal Girl came in and asked me what was the video for, I would tell her it was a fake news making tutorial to help her making a journalism career...
  12. War enthusiasts, come in please

    There isn't too much difference between posting in this forum and killing in a battlefield. The CNN boss (LOL) in the movie clip below knows this all the time. Using his word: The words are the new weapons. Satellites are the new artillery And I add some for him: Fake news are electronic warfare....
  13. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Star Wars are also wars which war enthusiasts always want. It is why each of these movie was able to sell tickets of 1 to 2 billion $. Lots of war fans out there
  14. War enthusiasts, come in please

    August1991 implied that Canadian boys joined army in ww2 just for some good reason like promoting democracy, freedom or righteousness.....they hadn't a drop of war enthusiast blood in their veins. So I asked him what those French and English soldiers fought for in the Seven Years War? Obviously you can not find a party of the war to play bad guy like Nazi in WW2, and without a bad guy logically there were also no good guys in the war. Still on both side there were soldiers who joined the war for believing they fought for righteousness. If the souls of the dead in the war were watching the present world, they would feel their sacrifice meaningless because old countrymen had betrayed their country and old enemy had become their new countrymen. The righteousness (for king and country stuff?) which they once put faith in is just void. We have to admit, human beings have these wars because they have war enthusiast gene in their blood. Righteousness is just their excuse to do what they want to do. So no need to be shame of being a war enthusiast. This is my point.
  15. War enthusiasts, come in please

    If you had ever considered what millions of German and Japanese soldiers died for during WW2, in France, Russia, China, the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean....far away from their homeland, you would not think I was so stupid. To those French and English soldiers who died in the Seven Years' War in North America, what did they die for? For political correctness? LOL, it seems like there were at least two versions of political correctness then.(Please forgive me not mentioning Spanish, Aboriginal and other parties.) Even if some of them truly died for this reason, when their souls are watching present Canada or America from heaven, they would find they had put their faith on false political gods then and the true value of their death is merely to inspire Hollywood film makers to make movies like Pirates of Caribbean to make billions $ GDP.
  16. War enthusiasts, come in please

    Initially, when I was conceiving the plot of the video, it was just a joke to make fun of the event. I gave President Trump the role no more or less than a jester or a clown. The video was supposed to end up at President Trump in his rage because Island Binomo disappeared. But when I began to seek ingredients of the video, I mean the video clips to fit the plot, I watched some Trump's speeches and I think he had, partially, convinced me on the fake news part. So I decided to give President Trump a more positive role in the video, to put some political meaning to the video, by using Trump's "fake news speech" at the ending. Fake news is more harmful to a nation than its president used to put his hands on women's butts. A joke for example: Army Guy has eventually got the F-35 which he has been ranting on for years. So I guess your fanboys and fangirls of wars all will want him to fly the plane to Afghanistan this afternoon to to win the unwinnable war. But, unfortunately, the plane is a secondhand one which is bought from Kijiji because the Canadian Liberal PM has hacked off some of its budget to build a luxurious refugee camp----you know that every time when these F-16s, CF-18s and now F-35s rolls out to bomb something, the refugees will come in sooner or later. So, the F-35 which Army Guy is meant to fly, has a defective radar and datalink which always give the pilot false information like, if enemy is in the east the radar display will show it is on the west. Would you expect Army Guy to shoot down an old MiG-23 by this F-35?
  17. I once asked BC2004 if she wanted to fly with pilot Trump on the B-52, with the attached video below and she gave me a reply Yes. I think she was either very brave or just not knowing what the video was. If you google 1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash you will find that none co-pilots wanted to fly with the pilot because he used to fly the plane by very dangerous ways. The plane was the same plane model which had been flying safely over half a century. The rules and safety measures were the same rules which applied to all planes. The only variable was the pilots----some of them handled the machine with caution and never push it to the verge of its safety margin, some of them didn't. When the later miscalculated their winning chance of gambling, they crashed and killed themselves, usually alone with others. Big things usually have small beginnings. A nuclear war won't happen all of sudden without any prologue and escalating sequence. Just like the pilot didn't crash a B-52 on the first day he flew it. He just pushed the safety margin a bit, then nothing happened. Then he pushed it again other day, still nothing happened. So he did these so on and so forth, until his end push. If both Britain and Germany had nuke in 1930s, could you assume Hitler would not annex Austria, Czechoslovakia and then invade Poland? Or assume Britain and France would not declare war upon Germany just because Hitler had nuke? If Hitler planned to take Britain, France and Soviet by one operation, I'm sure nuke would deter him. But if he was just like the pilot in the video, he pushed a bit, nothing happened; then he push again....and again....until a total war which may lead to use nuke.
  18. Maybe Canadian Liberal Party should create a new law to ban Trumpophobia in Canada in the first place... As for President Trump: Did Hitler start WW2? The answer is Yes. Did he meant to start WW2? My answer is he probably not. He probably thought the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact would deter the UK and France to declare war upon Germany when he invaded Poland. A big mistake. People do commit mistakes. But if it happens on a leader of a great power, the consequence may be severe. Millions of life will be lost because of a single miscalculation.
  19. Don't worry. Let me link the two rails together and get the train back to its course. It seems like our American friend BC2004, knows neither her weapon nor her enemies when she plans these nuke wars above. The nuke, was created as a weapon to deal with the targets like hot war enemy Nazi Germany and Japan, or the cold war enemy Soviet Union, which USA could geographically separate and economically distinguish from itself. But nowadays who is USA's enemy? The No.1 of the list, I think BC2004 would say: China!----That's.....almost correct except her beloved president doesn't use the word but instead of the "rival". The president is correct because either in hot war or in cold war, you don't trade with your enemies, at least not on the same scale as USA with China. So nuke has far less effect on China than old Soviet Union because the both economies are entangled so deep that neither of them could destroy other without hurt its own economy badly. At this point, BC2004's Canadian ally, Conservative Dude would say: damn it! Maybe we should nuke these Islamic shitholes first, then we will turn around to deal with Russia and China. This was President Bush's old strategy which had been proved not working. The cause is as same as China---most Islamic countries in the world are politically, economically and even geographically(I mean US military base) entangled with the USA, so BC2004 can't nuke them all. Now Conservative Dude's twin sister, Liberal Girl comes out: xul, you are right. It's shame that conservatives like my brother's Islamophobia has turned Muslim to our enemy, and our beloved Liberal Fuhrer Tridude is taking action to protect Muslim... I'm afraid that Liberal Girl is also wrong. Firstly, fighting an enemy which doesn't exist isn't called action but acting. Look the video below, those "soldiers" are not soldiers but actors, because the enemy-----an almighty robotic alien----only exists in the film maker's imagination. Does Islamophobia exist in Canada so widely that Canada government or lawmakers need to create some new law or move specified to protect Muslim? I don't think so. There were a few incidents and none of them couldn't be settled under current legislation. The liberals don't know they are the one who are creating Islamophobia national wide. Politics is just like a swing, it has a balance point, but if you force it off the point, it will try to get back. And not only back, but it will go further to the opposite direction. This is what has been happening in USA. When a swing begins to move back and forth, it can hardly be stopped by those riders who are on it. Then some riders who are so scared may wish BC2004 nuke the swing to release them from fear---if you don't exist, you don't need to fear anything----but BC2004 may not help because she probably is busying to nuke-help scared kids on her own swing....
  20. When I posted the 2 posts above, actually I hadn't seen the girl talking on TV or on web video yet and I didn't believe any conspiracy theory then. In my imagination, before the media reporters,the girl should be frightened for knowing her little trick is getting out of her hands. But in this video, she was just telling the lies like a....true politician. Hardly believe an 11 year-old could do this without any coaching and rehearsal. I'm really shocked. After watching this, the first thing coming in my mind is this actor line of this Barbie movie
  21. You sounds like you used to post here just for making yourself feel better, or the organization which you support looks better than it really does, so you assume other posters post here by the same way As for me, I used to discuss things with academic manner, which means I focus on fact and logic rather than which group or faction I'm supposed to belong to. I do feel sorrow for the girl and her family. Yes, the girl lied. It is her fault. But without those politicians, would-be Muslim rights activists and, as you have pointed, the media...too eagerly and immaturely amplifying the lie to advance their own political agenda, what would happen? If the incident went down normal or usual way: 1) The girl somehow lied to her parents or teachers, 2) then the parents or teachers reported to police, 3) then police investigatd and found its a lie, 4) then parents and teachers educated the girl why what she did was wrong... Isn't it some kind of happy ending to the girl's mistake? I read some posts here that the girl's family apologized to "every Canadian". Without those amplifiers, why should they apologize to every Canadian since most Canadian except a few teachers and police offices even have no chance to know the incident? It is those amplifiers who should apologize to every Canadian. And these guys just shrug off as if they have never been in it?
  22. I'm afraid that politicians should be blamed at first place over this matter. Making a joke for example: Polish Prime Minister: ...a few minutes ago, Russia has nuked a Polish colony in the South China Sea, Binomo. Do you know Binomo, Mr President? President Trump: We are aware the situation. I have ordered a nuke counterattack on Russia to defense our Polish ally.... CNN Live: ...President Trump has just ordered to launch nuke on Russia. Has he just started WW3...?(the broadcast stopped abruptly, so we all know the answer ) When the radioactive dust settles down, Polish Prime Minister@Real Polish PM: Fake news. I didn't call President Trump. We all know that Poland is a country without colonial history, and there isn't a Polish colony in the South China Sea. The phone call must be a prank... In the story above, President Trump should be fully responsible for the destruction of his country because as a national leader, not like the rest of us, he has ways to confirm what he hears from a phone call or TV before going into acting hastily. The same logic goes to Canadian Prime Minister and politicians as well.
  23. What would President Trump do to deal with this Binomo crisis? Or what would American people do to deal with this idiocracy crisis?
  24. Sometimes, the way you do a thing matters more than the thing itself. For example: Hugh Hefner or Harvey Weinstein, who got more women on his bed? I suppose the answer is Hugh Hefner. But why is Harvey Weinstein disgraced, not Hugh Hefner? Because Hefner was President Trump's supporter LOL, I'm joking. It is because the way how Harvey Weinstein got these women on his bed.
  25. I remember once Taiwan president commented on China: How can China be great? It's just big... so is USA Besides, other great powers then were busy on competing supremacy in Europe, so they didn't have chance to use America's weakest moment for their gain. If Americans were in civil war now, I bet Putin would willingly hand out weapons on both side, free of charge... And to American's credit, after the war, both side compromised a lot to heal the wound of the war. General Lee's temple hadn't been blasted for over 150 years...until President Trump was elected and the nation was teared apart again.