Jump to content


Photo

Netflix


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#1 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,651 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 24 November 2010 - 10:41 PM

I don't have cable, but I did try out this service (through my PS3). Unbelievable! I can watch unlimited movies on demand at 9$/month.

The downside is that: 1) the movies are old/weird, 2) there are potential bandwidth costs, 3) the Netflix network crashed once, 4) no 5.1 sound, or subtitles, 5) the movies seem older 4:3 versions, 6) few French or foreign films.

In my household, we like subtitles so that everyone can follow along. I like 5.1 sound. (I'm surprised that Netflix doesn't offer this since sound and subtitles take up so little data/bandwidth.)

Old and weird? In some ways, I consider that a plus. I watched the documentary Girl 27 the other night. It was simply a good documentary.

As to bandwidth costs, I reckon that we would have to watch one movie every day to incur data download costs with my ISP. I watch at most a movie or two each week.

The plus side? You get some very good TV programmes. For example, it has all the episodes of Yes, Minister, Yes, Prime Minister and Fawlty Towers. There are BBC's Redgrave's Elizabeth, and The Six Wives of Henry VIII.

But no Filles de Caleb, or Les Rois maudits. IOW, few French movies (although they have one very good Russian movie - in original with English subtitles.)

-----

Because of Netflix, I no longer rent DVDs (except for French movies), and I have now zero interest in paying for cable.

In a matter of months, the movie delivery company Netflix has gone from being the fastest-growing first-class mail customer of the United States Postal Service to the biggest source of streaming Web traffic in North America during peak evening hours.

NYT

If I understand properly, Netflix tried out its Internet streaming software in Canada before rolling it out in the US.


-----

God knows how the federal CRTC will deal with this. How will Quebec's Ministère de la Culture, des Communications et de la Condition féminine respond? (Seriously, that's the name appearing on the minister's title.)

Edited by August1991, 24 November 2010 - 10:48 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#2 Topaz

Topaz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,199 posts

Posted 25 November 2010 - 09:06 AM

I hope I'm right about this but I do think that Netflix, put a well know video chain nearly out of business and the company had to close down many of its stores. Sorry I can't remember the store, this was in the US.

#3 Michael Hardner

Michael Hardner

    Senior Member

  • Forum Facilitator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,500 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:Badlist: Leafless
    Goodlist: August1991, Canuck E Stan

Posted 25 November 2010 - 09:49 AM

Well, Blockbuster seems to be on its last legs if that's who you mean.

I am hearing generally good things from movie lovers about this service. For me, though, I don't want to buy a PS3, XBOX, or connect to my computer.

#4 bush_cheney2004

bush_cheney2004

    Senior Mocker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,715 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA! USA! USA!

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:00 AM

Netflix is splendid....the closest thing to direct access at anytime for films and television. Sony's netwok content compliments the service well. The only drawback (especially if one appreciates 5.1 audio), is the loud cooling fan noise from the PS3.

Another reason to love America! ;)
Economics trumps Virtue.
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin

#5 Oleg Bach

Oleg Bach

    Senior Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,777 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lower east side TO

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:01 AM

Netflix is splendid....the closest thing to direct access at anytime for films and television. Sony's netwok content compliments the service well. The only drawback (especially if one appreciates 5.1 audio), is the loud cooling fan noise from the PS3.

Another reason to love America! ;)

Can't love a person who's ass it three feet wide...sorry.

#6 bush_cheney2004

bush_cheney2004

    Senior Mocker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,715 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA! USA! USA!

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:08 AM

Can't love a person who's ass it three feet wide...sorry.


If you're into skinny boy butts, we can find a service for you to!
Economics trumps Virtue.
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin

#7 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,609 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:21 AM

I am hearing generally good things from movie lovers about this service. For me, though, I don't want to buy a PS3, XBOX, or connect to my computer.

Why is it any different that buying a cable box?

That said, I looked at the selection for new releases. They have next to nothing. The TV shows I want to watch I can see for free on the broadcaster's website or with my PVR and I never watch old movies. So it looks like Netflix won't do me any good.

Edited by TimG, 25 November 2010 - 11:23 AM.


#8 bush_cheney2004

bush_cheney2004

    Senior Mocker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,715 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA! USA! USA!

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:30 AM

Why is it any different that buying a cable box?


Cost for one....and more titles for old farts like me who do watch old content. Also, access from anywhere in the house with wifi on a big flat panel display, just like DirectTV.
Economics trumps Virtue.
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin

#9 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,609 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:32 AM

Cost for one....and more titles for old farts like me who do watch old content. Also, access from anywhere in the house with wifi on a big flat panel display, just like DirectTV.

I was responding to Michael who I assume has bought a cable box to watch TV but has a problem buying a different box to watch Netflix. Buying a box is a requirement for access to TV today. If one could eliminate your cable by using Netflix you would be further ahead financially.

Edited by TimG, 25 November 2010 - 11:34 AM.


#10 ToadBrother

ToadBrother

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,574 posts

Posted 25 November 2010 - 11:40 AM

I was responding to Michael who I assume has bought a cable box to watch TV but has a problem buying a different box to watch Netflix. Buying a box is a requirement for access to TV today. If one could eliminate your cable by using Netflix you would be further ahead financially.


Until your ISP, who also likely has its own TV service, decides to start nailing you for bandwidth overages.

#11 Michael Hardner

Michael Hardner

    Senior Member

  • Forum Facilitator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,500 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:Badlist: Leafless
    Goodlist: August1991, Canuck E Stan

Posted 25 November 2010 - 12:26 PM

Why is it any different that buying a cable box?

That said, I looked at the selection for new releases. They have next to nothing. The TV shows I want to watch I can see for free on the broadcaster's website or with my PVR and I never watch old movies. So it looks like Netflix won't do me any good.


Old movies are great, as are documentaries - as Auguste pointed out.

I have Bell TV, and everything comes with the monthly bundle so no purchases are required. I am not going to pay $100-$200 more for hardware to watch movies I have to pay for. My DVD player cost $50 and I can watch any movie on there that I can find on DVD.

#12 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,609 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 November 2010 - 01:49 PM

Until your ISP, who also likely has its own TV service, decides to start nailing you for bandwidth overages.

I am sure it would be cheaper than paying for channels I don't watch because they are bundled with channels I do watch. Frankly, I hate the "channel" model for TV. I care about content. I don't care who is broadcasting it. I want to pick the few shows I like and pay for them directly.

#13 DrGreenthumb

DrGreenthumb

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,584 posts

Posted 25 November 2010 - 06:10 PM

The main problem for me is that my internet is too slow to watch streaming video properly and my provider charges a fortune for any bandwidth usage over 5 gigs data transfer per month. My XBOX prefers gaming anyway. Just finishing ghostbusters, just finished Bioshock, and just ordered Fable 3 and COD Black Ops. Tv is boring and if I am going to watch anything other than cpac, or CBC's Power and Politics, it damn well better have 5.1 surround.

#14 bush_cheney2004

bush_cheney2004

    Senior Mocker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,715 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA! USA! USA!

Posted 25 November 2010 - 07:04 PM

I was responding to Michael who I assume has bought a cable box to watch TV but has a problem buying a different box to watch Netflix. Buying a box is a requirement for access to TV today. If one could eliminate your cable by using Netflix you would be further ahead financially.


Maybe....but my high speed broadband is bundled with phone and CATV from the same provider at significant savings already. I never suffered through DSL.
Economics trumps Virtue.
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin

#15 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,651 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 25 November 2010 - 07:21 PM

Sony's netwok content compliments the service well.

I don't know what you mean exactly. IMHO, Netflix will not only eliminate DVD rental stores but also iTunes and Sony's (really crappy) movie download service.

I am hearing generally good things from movie lovers about this service. For me, though, I don't want to buy a PS3, XBOX, or connect to my computer.

I at first refused to buy a PS3 too but eventually relented because it will play almost any file. Bluray discs are problematic but the PS3 handles them all - as well as linking to my PC. For $300, it was a good purchase and I'm not even a gamer.

That said, I looked at the selection for new releases. They have next to nothing. The TV shows I want to watch I can see for free on the broadcaster's website or with my PVR and I never watch old movies. So it looks like Netflix won't do me any good.

You understand it well. If you want the latest TV show or movie, Netflix is not for you. But my nephew just loved the old re-runs of "Hoarders Season 3".

I suspect that Netflix will soon offer a premium service based on pay-for-play. If so, they are using a smart marketing strategy. In some cases, particularly with new technology or a start up, it's better to go from low-end to high-end. BMW can't now sell a cheap car. But Hyundai could possibly go into the luxury range.

Edited by August1991, 25 November 2010 - 07:28 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2