He answered questions yesterday in a media scrum. His answers just weren't the ones you wanted Shady. Stop lying.So expecting politicians to take questions from the media is now considered trolling? Wow, so much for democracy.
Layton found nude in massage parlour!
#677
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:32 AM
Is there video or a transcript of the questions he answered. I'd love to see or read it. Or are you just referring to the statement he made to the media?He answered questions yesterday in a media scrum. His answers just weren't the ones you wanted Shady. Stop lying.
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
#678
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:36 AM
Not only did he answer questions and address the issue you're talking about, but he didn't run an entire campaign on avoiding the media's questions. Even the reporters that paid $50,000 per seat on the Conservative jet had no access to asking Harper questions.So expecting politicians to take questions from the media is now considered trolling? Wow, so much for democracy.
Look, I get it. You're a partisan hack and you want to get a rise out of people. It's hilarious, but not even the remotest bit credible. In fact, your approach is so bereft of validity that the Conservative Party has not even taken this approach and are distancing themselves for the backlash that is sure to happen, whether at the polls or in the courts.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#679
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:40 AM
Just a quick google shows he took questions yesterday. Do you always post statements with out even trying to find out if they are true. Is it because you expect everyone to act like Harper or what?Is there video or a transcript of the questions he answered. I'd love to see or read it. Or are you just referring to the statement he made to the media?
http://m.news1130.com/Local/Article/219859
#680
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:42 AM
Perfect. That's all I wanted to know. I'm not sure why this wasn't posted pages ago.Just a quick google shows he took questions yesterday. Do you always post statements with out even trying to find out if they are true. Is it because you expect everyone to act like Harper or what?
http://m.news1130.com/Local/Article/219859
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
#682
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:49 AM
Those are two seperate issues. Layton answering questions from the media is completely different than whether or not there's something more to the story. It's not rocket science to conclude that there may be more to the story regarding an individual found completely naked at a massage place that's cited for sexual services.Or why the accusers never bothered to check for themselves....
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
#683
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:51 AM
Or there is no issue at all.Those are two seperate issues. Layton answering questions from the media is completely different than whether or not there's something more to the story. It's not rocket science to conclude that there may be more to the story regarding an individual found completely naked at a massage place that's cited for sexual services.
#684
Posted 01 May 2011 - 09:54 AM
Indeed, it is not rocket science to conclude that there is something more to a story when the POLICE concluded there was nothing more to the story. It's complete non-sense.Those are two seperate issues. Layton answering questions from the media is completely different than whether or not there's something more to the story. It's not rocket science to conclude that there may be more to the story regarding an individual found completely naked at a massage place that's cited for sexual services.
#687
Posted 01 May 2011 - 10:04 AM
My only interest in the issue is I enjoy watching the NDP squirm as the same type of scurrilous allegation that they have been hurling at Harper for years turns around and bites them.But he has only been judged and hung by people who wouldn't vote for him anyway.
Edited by TimG, 01 May 2011 - 10:04 AM.
#688
Posted 01 May 2011 - 10:06 AM
My only interest in the issue is I enjoy watching the NDP squirm as the same type of scurrilous allegation that they have been hurling at Harper for years turns around and bites them.
They don't seem to be squirming, but enjoying an uninterrupted increase in support. And when did they make similar types of "scurrilous allegations" at Harper?
--Josh Billings
#689
Posted 01 May 2011 - 10:06 AM
Most people are actually either laughing at how rabid anti-NDPers are latching on this non-issue or turning away in disgust at the non-sense.My only interest in the issue is I enjoy watching the NDP squirm as the same type of scurrilous allegation that they have been hurling at Harper for years turns around and bites them.
#690
Posted 01 May 2011 - 10:08 AM
Or possibly realizing the Jack "John" Layton might be a bit of a sleeze bag.Most people are actually either laughing at how rabid anti-NDPers are latching on this non-issue or turning away in disgust at the non-sense.
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010








