Canadian gov't won't list asbestos
#1
Posted 14 June 2011 - 06:25 AM
#2
Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:09 AM
#3
Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:11 AM
Something doesn't stop causing cancer when you cross the border.
#4
Posted 14 June 2011 - 11:42 AM
#5
Posted 14 June 2011 - 12:01 PM
We need to make an international organization that has binding control over such things.
Something doesn't stop causing cancer when you cross the border.
We have international organizations that are already doing this kind of thing, but are ineffectual in it. IAEA was to regulate nuclear plants ... and well, see Fukushima.
But it should be Canada telling Quebec what is what instead of the other way around. So I can't see international organizations being effective for this. I don't put much faith in international organizations anyways.
ohm on soundcloud.com
#6
Posted 14 June 2011 - 07:23 PM
#7
Posted 15 June 2011 - 08:18 AM
Ridiculous. I don't want to cede our sovereignty to any international organizations. You're a real anti-freedom techno-crat type aren't you?We need to make an international organization that has binding control over such things.
Something doesn't stop causing cancer when you cross the border.
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
#8
Posted 15 June 2011 - 01:45 PM
Ummm... not necessarily saying that Asbestos is safe, and not saying whether it should be banned or not... but how exactly do "workers throwing it up to separate it" in any way address the claim that its safe if "handled the right way"? I would assume that "throwing asbestos" would be something that would be considered "handling it the wrong way".The Industry minister said today that as long as its handle the right way their no danger, BS! They are taking it out on the Hill and he says there's no danger? It showed one country were its workers were throw it up in the air to separate it, can you imagine his lungs? This government is a double -standard government. BTW, if a country WANTS to buy products for a nuke, by Harper view, Canada is open for business.
Its like someone saying "gasoline is a safe fuel to use in transportation", and you try to refute him by pointing to the gas fight in Zoolander to prove that its dangerous. (i.e. you're trying to debunk an argument by bringing up an irrelevant example.)
#9
Posted 16 June 2011 - 05:01 PM
Are you really trying to talk sense to Topaz? Dream on.Ummm... not necessarily saying that Asbestos is safe, and not saying whether it should be banned or not... but how exactly do "workers throwing it up to separate it" in any way address the claim that its safe if "handled the right way"? I would assume that "throwing asbestos" would be something that would be considered "handling it the wrong way".
Its like someone saying "gasoline is a safe fuel to use in transportation", and you try to refute him by pointing to the gas fight in Zoolander to prove that its dangerous. (i.e. you're trying to debunk an argument by bringing up an irrelevant example.)
The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.
#10
Posted 16 June 2011 - 06:17 PM
Ridiculous. I don't want to cede our sovereignty to any international organizations. You're a real anti-freedom techno-crat type aren't you?
I'll admit to the technocrat part. But I'm pretty sure that there are sovereignty concessions you would be willing to make right ? Such as to trade and the WTO ?
#11
Posted 07 July 2011 - 06:46 AM
#12
Posted 07 July 2011 - 07:46 AM
The only really effective means would be the peoples vote. Having said that, the Canadian public gave this government a majority, despite clear evidence that they are lying scum. So now, let Canadian voters take responsibility for everything that happens as a consequence, within Canada and abroad.We have international organizations that are already doing this kind of thing, but are ineffectual in it. IAEA was to regulate nuclear plants ... and well, see Fukushima.
But it should be Canada telling Quebec what is what instead of the other way around. So I can't see international organizations being effective for this. I don't put much faith in international organizations anyways.
#13
Posted 14 August 2011 - 07:36 AM
#14
Posted 14 August 2011 - 07:38 AM
#15
Posted 14 August 2011 - 08:41 AM
Your Winnipeg link didn't work for me. But I found it here-The Tories are at odds with a woman whose hubby died of cancer from asbestos and apparently she's been using the Conservative logo to use against the exporting of asbestos to other countries. Thoughts? http://www.winnipegf...-127677078.html
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/tories-tussle-with-asbestos-widow-over-use-of-party-logo-in-ad-campaign.html










