Jump to content


Photo

The disappearing socialists


22 replies to this topic

#1 Pliny

Pliny

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,597 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey

Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:09 AM

NDP wishes to shed some of it's socialist appearance.

The great socialist disappearing act

Are we in trouble??? Will it become.....gulp...fascist??

I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.

 

Love this: "In the private sector if you can cut costs you are a hero. In the public sector you are a goat."


#2 Michael Hardner

Michael Hardner

    Senior Member

  • Forum Facilitator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,500 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:Badlist: Leafless
    Goodlist: August1991, Canuck E Stan

Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:58 AM

They may christen themselves as the MDP - Mutualist Democratic Party.

#3 Jack Weber

Jack Weber

    Proud 4 time member of the MLW Cooler Cabal!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,861 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:movies,music,sports,history

Posted 18 June 2011 - 12:29 PM

How would a socially democratic party of the centre left become Fascist?
The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

#4 WIP

WIP

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,906 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 18 June 2011 - 12:33 PM

I figured they would start repositioning themselves as soon as soon as they became aware of an opportunity to remove that Liberal middleground. This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, considering that this is exactly what leftwing parties have done in England, France, or any country that uses a first-past-the-post election system.

We also have the added problem that the people with the money are not on the political left. Now that Harper is ending public campaign financing, everyone is chasing the same people with the bags of money, so our future NDP will look similar to the Democratic Party, which tries to be populist enough to get the votes of the majority, while currying favour of the Wall Street bankers and other sources of funding and future employment after leaving office.

I'm quitting for good this time.  I can't stand most of the people who post here.  Most of what passes for debate is pointless bullshit and retreaded propaganda. And I'm fed up with wasting time trying regain use of the quote feature. Time to move on to somewhere that will match my interests and concerns.


#5 Topaz

Topaz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,199 posts

Posted 18 June 2011 - 04:06 PM

So would they be called the NEWER NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

#6 Oleg Bach

Oleg Bach

    Senior Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,777 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lower east side TO

Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:20 PM

Just like feminists who age and become comfortable and some powerful...they really don't have time for idealism. They become just like what they hated. Socialists have always wanted to have more fair advantage....eventually they become capitalists...and the cycle starts all over again...power and privledge and the established status quo always in time breed corruption.

#7 bloodyminded

bloodyminded

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,411 posts

Posted 19 June 2011 - 02:52 AM

...power and privledge and the established status quo always in time breed corruption.


I'm not sure if this is logically axiomatic, but it might be, since history seems to bear it out.
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.
--Josh Billings

#8 Shwa

Shwa

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,952 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Da Shwa
  • Interests:Sports, Music, Books, Movies

Posted 19 June 2011 - 08:07 AM

How would a socially democratic party of the centre left become Fascist?



Leftist Fascists Strike Yet Again (The silencing never stops)

Started by Shady, mind you, but it should give you a good idea. :rolleyes:

Wait. You participated on that thread... LOL

#9 Pliny

Pliny

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,597 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey

Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:53 AM

How would a socially democratic party of the centre left become Fascist?


I guess they just say they are the workers national socialist party then claim they aren't socialist or have someone determine thaey are no longer and amazingly disappear from the left and reappear on the extreme right.

It's pretty simple Jack. Socialists once established in power simply make laws that make the State all powerful for the common good, of course. Then when a majority of people start finding themselves on the other side of the common good the noose is tightened.

I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.

 

Love this: "In the private sector if you can cut costs you are a hero. In the public sector you are a goat."


#10 Pliny

Pliny

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,597 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey

Posted 19 June 2011 - 11:07 AM

So would they be called the NEWER NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

Maybe the New "Progressive" democratic party.

I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.

 

Love this: "In the private sector if you can cut costs you are a hero. In the public sector you are a goat."


#11 dre

dre

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,674 posts

Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:02 PM

I figured they would start repositioning themselves as soon as soon as they became aware of an opportunity to remove that Liberal middleground. This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, considering that this is exactly what leftwing parties have done in England, France, or any country that uses a first-past-the-post election system.

We also have the added problem that the people with the money are not on the political left. Now that Harper is ending public campaign financing, everyone is chasing the same people with the bags of money, so our future NDP will look similar to the Democratic Party, which tries to be populist enough to get the votes of the majority, while currying favour of the Wall Street bankers and other sources of funding and future employment after leaving office.



Yeah ending public funding is a huge step backwards. One of the dumbest things weve ever done.

#12 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,651 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:54 PM

I liked this quote:

“Socialism is not an anchor, it’s a rocket,” Barry Weisleder, who chairs the unofficial socialist caucus that meets in its own room at NDP conventions, shot back.

“You can take socialism out of the preamble, but you can’t take socialism out of the NDP.”

Toronto Star

Social democrat? Socialist? What's the difference?

The NDP is foolish to be drawn into a debate of semantics but that is what Leftists often do. One reason that I stopped being a Leftist is because it dawned on me that Leftists love to argue about everything (IOW, Leftists love to have options) and yet they want to impose a system that removes choice from people.

In a nutshell, the NDP wants to distinguish itself from the Liberals and offer voters a socialist alternative. But the socialist NDP favours restricting our choice when, for example, it comes to health care and education.

Edited by August1991, 19 June 2011 - 10:55 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#13 dre

dre

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,674 posts

Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:59 PM

I liked this quote:Toronto Star

Social democrat? Socialist? What's the difference?

The NDP is foolish to be drawn into a debate of semantics but that is what Leftists often do. One reason that I stopped being a Leftist is because it dawned on me that Leftists love to argue about everything (IOW, Leftists love to have options) and yet they want to impose a system that removes choice from people.

In a nutshell, the NDP wants to distinguish itself from the Liberals and offer voters a socialist alternative. But the socialist NDP favours restricting our choice when, for example, it comes to health care and education.


Social democrat? Socialist? What's the difference?


Theres a pretty huge difference actually.

#14 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,651 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 19 June 2011 - 11:10 PM

We also have the added problem that the people with the money are not on the political left. Now that Harper is ending public campaign financing, everyone is chasing the same people with the bags of money, so our future NDP will look similar to the Democratic Party, which tries to be populist enough to get the votes of the majority, while currying favour of the Wall Street bankers and other sources of funding and future employment after leaving office.

Uh, in Canada, the maximum an individual can contribute to a federal political party is $1100. It is illegal for corporations and unions to make donations. Third party advertising is restricted.

IOW, there are no bags of money. Nevertheless, the Conservatives (and NDP) have been able to raise millions of dollars from hundreds of thousands of ordinary Canadians. In 2008 (the easiest data I was able to find quickly), the average donation to the Conservatives was $104. To the NDP, it was $59.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#15 Moonlight Graham

Moonlight Graham

    Whipping My Caucus

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,866 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:farting into the wind

Posted 20 June 2011 - 02:17 AM

Uh, in Canada, the maximum an individual can contribute to a federal political party is $1100. It is illegal for corporations and unions to make donations. Third party advertising is restricted.


Of course there's no loop-hole around these rules, right? A CEO, their spouse, the board of directors and their families etc. cant make donations of course.
"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice, without constraint." - Alexander Hamilton

"Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army



Reply to this topic