Keystone XL Delayed
#2
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:20 PM
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-10/transcanada-s-keystone-pipeline-is-delayed-by-u-s-to-study-alternatives.html
It's like the Obama Administration doesn't even care about jobs. Oh well, lets hope that Romney does.
So it's jobs in America that you're concerned about - and not the Transcanada Keystone Xl Pipeline?
#3
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:32 PM
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-10/transcanada-s-keystone-pipeline-is-delayed-by-u-s-to-study-alternatives.html
It's like the Obama Administration doesn't even care about jobs. Oh well, lets hope that Romney does.
we're not waiting for 18 months while the US sorts itself out
who's to say what Romney would have done in Obamas shoes
#4
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:36 PM
So it's jobs in America that you're concerned about - and not the Transcanada Keystone Xl Pipeline?
Why is the US all of a sudden concerned about their environment
A lot of things that are made are made using oil
I know its a bad habit but we need oil to survive in this world
You just lost an amazing opportunity
Have fun with the Saudis
btw does anyone even live in the central plain states? hardly
Edited by olp1fan, 10 November 2011 - 02:36 PM.
#5
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:38 PM
So it's jobs in America that you're concerned about - and not the Transcanada Keystone Xl Pipeline?
A little from column a and a little from column b.
Its in our benefit that you guys get as much jobs as possible so you use more of our oil.
"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary
Economic Left/Right: 4.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77
#7
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:49 PM
What about jobs for our guy's? Texas should be in the business of shipping refinery equipment to Alberta.A little from column a and a little from column b.
Its in our benefit that you guys get as much jobs as possible so you use more of our oil.
Shipping finished product instead of raw materials would also have less impact on everyone's environment.
#9
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:57 PM
So it's jobs in America that you're concerned about - and not the Transcanada Keystone Xl Pipeline?
Doesn't matter to us, AW! Either America buys our oil or China will!
Meanwhile, surely you will grant that every Republican next election will throw it in the Democrats face that they turned down all those jobs with the pipeline! I'll wager there will be more than a few American voters that will care about jobs more than a possible oil spill.
Meanwhile, America shows no sign of cutting back on its oil consumption. That means that if the pipeline for Canadian oil is turned down that pretty well sews things up for the Arabs. Maybe if we put our women in bags, killed a few gays and started using stoning as a court sentence you'd like us more! 'Cuz like it or not, AW, those are America's only other choices.
If we do wind up selling the oil to China, odds are that if America changes its mind it will be too late. China likes to lock things up with long term contracts.
I just don't understand why you folks love those Saudis so!
-- George Bernard Shaw
"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
#11
Posted 10 November 2011 - 03:05 PM
Smallc must care - he started the thread.Doesn't matter to us, AW! Either America buys our oil or China will!
Sure there will be, just as there are more than a few American voters who care more about the environment.Meanwhile, surely you will grant that every Republican next election will throw it in the Democrats face that they turned down all those jobs with the pipeline! I'll wager there will be more than a few American voters that will care about jobs more than a possible oil spill.
Who said anything about not liking you? It's not about who we "like" more - it's about looking at the environment along with what's ultimately best for us. Agree or disagree with the outcome, that's what it's about.Meanwhile, America shows no sign of cutting back on its oil consumption. That means that if the pipeline for Canadian oil is turned down that pretty well sews things up for the Arabs. Maybe if we put our women in bags, killed a few gays and started using stoning as a court sentence you'd like us more! 'Cuz like it or not, AW, those are America's only other choices.
So Canada will base it's actions on what China "likes?" I highly doubt it.If we do wind up selling the oil to China, odds are that if America changes its mind it will be too late. China likes to lock things up with long term contracts.
It's not about love for them - it's about what's best for us when it comes to things like purchasing oil. Same as it is with Canada - you do what's best for you. But then, I'm sure you already knew that.I just don't understand why you folks love those Saudis so!
#12
Posted 10 November 2011 - 03:19 PM
...I just don't understand why you folks love those Saudis so!
Yes you do....sweet crude....which ain't what Canada has.
This is a chance to put up or shut up....show those damn 'merkins what for and send all the tarsands oil to China!
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin
#13
Posted 10 November 2011 - 03:35 PM
Look at all of the oil pipelines already in Nebraska
http://energy.nation.../McCown_map.php
#15
Posted 10 November 2011 - 03:40 PM
Yes you do....sweet crude....which ain't what Canada has.
This is a chance to put up or shut up....show those damn 'merkins what for and send all the tarsands oil to China!
I wonder what the front runners in the GOP race will say about this. I remember some pundits on CNN having a tizzy about the proposed pipeline to the west coast. I look at it as a nice wedge issue the GOP can use on the dems.
One thing I do know for sure, uncle Kevin will be epic on the exchange tonight!
"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary
Economic Left/Right: 4.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77










