Just in case anyone is actually convinced by AW's argument that religion has little to do with US pols
Edited by cybercoma, 02 December 2011 - 01:48 PM.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 01:48 PM
Edited by cybercoma, 02 December 2011 - 01:48 PM.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
Posted 02 December 2011 - 02:35 PM
Exactly.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 04:43 PM
Too often conclusions are drawn about "Canadians" based on the media and reaction to that media, outside Canada too, and 'media reaction' and 'world reaction' and 'Canadian reaction' are all very different things.
In my opinion.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 05:21 PM
Posted 02 December 2011 - 05:25 PM
The least religious countries are countries like Denmark, Norway, Hong Kong, Sweden. The worlds top countries in terms of human development.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:04 PM
Exactly - in spite of claims that the U.S. is wildly religious while religion just doesn't mean that much in Canada.Actually both Canada and the US are "moderately" religious countries.
I believe Italy is the most religious Christian country of the developed nations, and I don't think Italians are generally poor and/or miserable. Interesting, though, that you assume people living in countries that are not rich are "miserable." I question that. I don't assume "rich" equals happy and "poverty" equals misery.Generally the ammount of poverty and misery in a country is proportionate to the ammount of very religious people, and countries with the least ammount of religious are the happiest and enjoy the highest standard of living.
The most religious countries are countries like Egypt, Sri Lanka, Congo, Sierra Leone, Senegal, and Morroco. Im not sure if religion creates poverty and misery, or if poverty and misery causes religion. Need a separate thread for that I guess.
The least religious countries are countries like Denmark, Norway, Hong Kong, Sweden. The worlds top countries in terms of human development.
Yes, it does depend on where one goes inside both countries, as has already been pointed out, but I think many people in Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana would be surprised to find out that they live in a "poor, crappy" state.And it depends on where you go inside both countries. Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts are less religious that Canadians on average. But Mississipi, Alabama, and Louisana are much higher. Again... Poor crappy places = more religion.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:20 PM
Those people would be completely oblivious then, since Mississippi is the poorest state in the country (Louisiana and Alabama are in the bottom 10 states as well).I think many people in Mississippi ... would be surprised to find out that they live in a "poor, crappy" state.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:28 PM
Exactly - in spite of claims that the U.S. is wildly religious while religion just doesn't mean that much in Canada.
The United States remains among the most religious nations in the world, according to a worldwide study by the University.
About 46 percent of American adults attend church at least once a week, not counting weddings, funerals and christenings, compared with 14 percent of adults in Great Britain, 8 percent in France, 7 percent in Sweden and 4 percent in Japan.
Moreover, 58 percent of Americans say they often think about the meaning and purpose of life, compared with 25 percent of British, 26 percent of Japanese and 31 percent of West Germans, the study says.
"While traditional religious belief and participation in organized religion have steadily declined in most advanced industrial nations, especially in Western Europe, this is not the case in the United States," says Ronald Inglehart, a researcher at the Institute for Social Research (ISR) and director of the ISR World Values Surveys, which were conducted in more than 80 nations between 1981 and 2001
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:48 PM
Yes, they would have to be "completely oblivious" not to realize that they live in a CRAPPY state.Those people would be completely oblivious then, since Mississippi is the poorest state in the country (Louisiana and Alabama are in the bottom 10 states as well).
So PEI and New Brunswick are, in fact, CRAPPY provinces...Those states are in fact poor in comparison to say, New York, or California...just as PEI or New Brunswick are poor in comparison to Alberta or Saskatchewan.
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:50 PM
The 20% swing isn't taking error into account - as the results put both countries in the same moderate category, which hardly supports your conclusion that it means "a lot less" in Canada.I wouldnt say it "doesnt mean that much". It just means a lot less up here. There was about a 20% swing in that study I quoted.