The New Norm for stocks
High Speed Computers Killing the Market?
Edited by Argus, 17 November 2011 - 06:59 PM.
Posted 17 November 2011 - 06:58 PM
Edited by Argus, 17 November 2011 - 06:59 PM.
Posted 17 November 2011 - 07:14 PM
....A stock can race up one day and plunge the next, then rise again the following day. So how do you invest unless you love gambling? And what is all this computer buying going do do, ultimately, to the idea of the stock market as a measure of a company's actual value?
Posted 17 November 2011 - 08:47 PM
I do support genocide
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:33 PM
Ultimately, the rise and fall of a stock market price is a sophisticated but subjective debate about the value of future earnings.I've been watching the market a lot the last year, and what's kind of struck me is not that it's been largely a bear market, but that it's been largely a senseless market. Stocks rocket up and down day after day for no discernible reason, almost completely unpredictable. Value? Worth? Not important. It seems like it's nothing but a big gamble as to which stocks will rise and which will fall.
Edited by August1991, 17 November 2011 - 10:34 PM.
Posted 18 November 2011 - 01:54 PM
I think that given the number of macro events that have been in play, such as the "Arab Spring" and the slow-motion implosion of the Euro, the volatility has been sensible, not senseless. The market is a land of opportunity for people with nerves of steel.I've been watching the market a lot the last year, and what's kind of struck me is not that it's been largely a bear market, but that it's been largely a senseless market. Stocks rocket up and down day after day for no discernible reason, almost completely unpredictable.
Posted 19 November 2011 - 10:44 AM
Posted 19 November 2011 - 05:55 PM
Indeed. These are more variables having an effect on future earnings. Who knows the future?I think that given the number of macro events that have been in play, such as the "Arab Spring" and the slow-motion implosion of the Euro, the volatility has been sensible, not senseless. The market is a land of opportunity for people with nerves of steel.
If you don't like volatility, buy a good municipal/utility bond with a 5/10 year maturity. You know that you'll get your money. Buy one bond to keep your transaction costs down. Think about taxes.I don't like market volatility! I don't like seeing that I've lost $2000 in one day! I put a lot of money into bond funds and bond ETFs to try to counter balance stock losses, but the last few days they've been useless. I thought bonds went up when the stocks went down? Last few days every single bond fund and ETF has been down along with most stocks. WTH? You can't even rely on gold to counter balance a bad day anymore as it's always down too.
This point deserves elaboration.In this forum (and OWS), it costs only your own time.
In a market, the cost includes your own time, and the cost of other people's time.
Posted 19 November 2011 - 09:41 PM
But if my order is filled and I buy a few shares, I make the share price go up and make many observors (Google/Yahoo finance users) feel richer.
I do support genocide
Posted 19 November 2011 - 09:54 PM
Uh, how often do you trade?Trust me, you buying a "few" shares isn't going to affect the price of a stock in any meaningful way, at all. Well, there are exceptions, illiquid stocks and stocks of very small cap companies, but stocks of major companies take flipping millions of dollars before you begin to notice an effect.
Posted 19 November 2011 - 10:37 PM
Uh, how often do you trade?
I do support genocide