For or against long gun registry?
#1
Posted 25 December 2011 - 07:13 PM
Thanks for reading if you made it this far
#2
Posted 25 December 2011 - 09:26 PM
I think that cities should be able to make sensible regulations concerning time, place and manner of use. I don't think there's any indication that the Mark Lapines of the world would meekly comply with a registration requirement.I hope the conservatives go a step further and get rid of licensing aswell at the federal level because the whole of Canada is not like Toronto or Montreal being busy downtowns.
==============
Clarke Institute (link), home page for much of this site.
==============
Islamism and Communism (and Fascism)equal contempt of what the West represents - freedom and achievement (per Bob)
#3
Posted 25 December 2011 - 09:55 PM
Against. It would never have done a thing to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of the insane. Neither will cracking down on gang-bangers mind you, but the politicians still need to be seen doing something right?For or against long gun registry? Which one and why
Luckily us country folk never get insane so them damn city slickers can go register themselves up the wahzoo for all we care.
#4
Posted 26 December 2011 - 12:14 AM
#5
Posted 26 December 2011 - 08:40 AM
Yet for an honest citizen to fail to register meant a sentence more harsh than that typically given to said monkeyshine robbing a variety store with a handgun.
To me, this spoke volumes about the real aims of the gun registry and the actual character and values of those supporting it.
In all these years I have heard NOTHING from the gun registry supporters about increasing the punishment for illegal use of a firearm!
There must be something wrong with their heads! A justice system with no true deterrence cannot possibly work. A system that targets the innocent instead of the guilty will never command respect.
-- George Bernard Shaw
"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
#6
Posted 26 December 2011 - 08:41 AM
I've been a hunter and gun owner since my teens, and I never had a problem with a certain level of gun control.
Truncated for brevity.
that guy was crazy, plain and simple, and you can't legislate crazy away.
"Prior to the long-gun registry, we had a perfectly fine system (Firearm Acquisition Certificate) whereby handguns were strictly limited to those willing to suffer the red tape involved in owning them, automatic weapons and stuff like bazookas were off limits"
I doth certainly agree. The fiasco of registering long guns did nothing to stop crime. The money would have been far better spent on policing.
Were I a cop I would assume any home I was about to enter for criminal activity or violence had a gun or knife, I wouldn't be checking a list.
I say what we had (FAC) was enough.
"It would be a laugh to be someone like
Peeves, causing mayhem and not bothering."
-- J.K. Rowling
#7
Posted 26 December 2011 - 02:40 PM
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#8
Posted 26 December 2011 - 03:34 PM
I try not to point out grammar and spelling mistakes too often because I'm not perfect either, but I found that post nearly unreadable.
I think his main point is clear, CC. Being a poor speller may make his points hard to understand but it changes nothing as to their truth or falsehood.
He asks what did the gun registry ever do to help stop crime? It's a valid question. It did nothing to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals. In fact, in some cases criminals gained access to the information in order to steal legal guns from homes! There was a scandal here in Ontario where one of the civil serpents involved in the data management had a Hell's Angel for a boyfriend. So it could be argued that the registry hurt more than it helped.
Perhaps you have some concrete examples as to how the gun registry was effective in stopping crime you can share.
-- George Bernard Shaw
"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
#10
Posted 26 December 2011 - 04:31 PM
There was a scandal here in Ontario where one of the civil serpents involved in the data management had a Hell's Angel for a boyfriend.
How long ago was that?
Oh, remember me for an old guy, AF!
It was about 7-8 years ago, as I recall. I'm not firm on the date as I was more impressed with the fact that it happened.
I'm just too old, fat and busy to google everything for everybody, especially when for many posters on this board (I'm sure you've already run into a few) they couldn't care if God himself was a witness and endorsed the account - they will never change their minds!
Edited by Wild Bill, 26 December 2011 - 04:32 PM.
-- George Bernard Shaw
"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
#11
Posted 27 December 2011 - 04:47 AM
No. His main point is not clear because I didn't read through the post. He may have a point, but when someone's spelling and grammar is that bad, I can't be bothered sitting here and deciphering it.I think his main point is clear, CC. Being a poor speller may make his points hard to understand but it changes nothing as to their truth or falsehood.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#12
Posted 27 December 2011 - 04:58 AM
Are you sure you're not mixing stories? Wasn't it Maxime Bernier that left NATO documents lying around and his partner at that time had connections to the Hell's Angels?It was about 7-8 years ago, as I recall. I'm not firm on the date as I was more impressed with the fact that it happened.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#13
Posted 27 December 2011 - 08:15 AM
#14
Posted 27 December 2011 - 08:25 AM
Ya, that'll work, I'll just tell the coyote to stop killing my chickens and by the way stand over there and wait, animal control should be here in about an hour to control you. Why do I need a gun? Right now there are three deer in my freezer, as there usually are at this time of year because I make a point of filling my freezer every fall. Venison is excellent lean meat, free of hormones and antibiotics, and you can't buy it in stores. So if I want it (and I do), I have to go kill it myself. I do own a bow and I hunt with it, but that's very time consuming. Bowhunting is enjoyable, but the rifle fills the freezer. That's why I need a gun.The farmers has said they need one for wild animals, well one would call the animal control to deal with it. Seriously, why does the general public need a gun? If you need the feel of power, go buy a paint gun. That should go over well,lol.
#15
Posted 27 December 2011 - 08:36 AM
So why do you need a gun now that the freezer is full? Oh right...Ya, that'll work, I'll just tell the coyote to stop killing my chickens and by the way stand over there and wait, animal control should be here in about an hour to control you. Why do I need a gun? Right now there are three deer in my freezer, as there usually are at this time of year because I make a point of filling my freezer every fall. Venison is excellent lean meat, free of hormones and antibiotics, and you can't buy it in stores. So if I want it (and I do), I have to go kill it myself. I do own a bow and I hunt with it, but that's very time consuming. Bowhunting is enjoyable, but the rifle fills the freezer. That's why I need a gun.
As for your damn chickens and as I already told you, build a better coop. It's people like you with lackadaisical food production practices that attract coyotes and bears into conflict with humans in the first place. Now we have to put up with your bullets flying around the neighbourhood too? Thanks a lot.







