Alberta Election 2012
#1
Posted 09 February 2012 - 05:18 AM
Polls currently have the Tories up at 40%-45% while the opposition parties are battling with one another; with Wildrose having an edge in that department.
My personal projections are for a PC majority, with a Wildrose opposition.
Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!
#4
Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:05 AM
Do you have a link for the poll.I'm wondering if it'd be out of place for me to create a thread for the coming Election in Alberta. A unified place to discuss polls and events etc, until the polls close; and then to discuss the results of course!!
Polls currently have the Tories up at 40%-45% while the opposition parties are battling with one another; with Wildrose having an edge in that department.
My personal projections are for a PC majority, with a Wildrose opposition.
Last poll in the Edmonton Journal had the Tories at 53%.
You're not exacty stepping out on a limb there with your projection, though you are right.
I project the Tories will win easily. Wildrose will win single digit seats. Liberals- road kill this time, even though they got 26% of vote last time they might get half now that a red Tory is leader. NDP will be looking for a purpose in life and a new leader.
The Tories elected a new leader and new Premier, Alison Redford. The Liberals also got a new leader, Raj Sherman.Didn't they just have an election last year?
The ideological ties are much stronger between the federal PCs and the provincial PC party than with Wildrose. You'd understand it better if you spent some quiet time reviewing what happened last year with the departure of Stelmach, and why he left. I'll give you a hint: both parties moved to the middle. At the provincial level, that left Wildrose with the certainty of being an ineffective fringe, which makes many people but especially the PCs happy. By doing so, the PCs picked up tons of former Liberal votes, and also they purged their party of a splinter that held them back.excellent idea if only to allow some recollection of what Progressive Conservatives are about... and to also highlight ties between Harper Conservatives and the Wildrose!
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:11 AM
The ideological ties are much stronger between the federal PCs and the provincial PC party than with Wildrose.
Former Harper advisor to chair Alberta’s Wildrose campaign
Tom Flanagan, once among Stephen Harper’s most influential advisors, will chair the election campaign for Alberta’s Wildrose Party, an upstart hard-right movement aiming to unseat Alberta’s 40-year-old Progressive Conservative regime. Flanagan, a professor at the University of Calgary, has deep ties to the federal Conservative Party. Many view his prominent role with the Wildrose as a sign that federal party heavyweights are divided over who to support in the upcoming campaign.
#6
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:38 AM
There you have it. The Toronto media will try to make a sure thing into something else, I guess it sells magazines in Ontario or something.Tom Flanagan, once among Stephen Harper’s most influential advisors
Really, before you embarass yourself, do some reading on what happened last year on two fronts: a)the circumstances of Stelmach leaving, which have their strong roots in how he arrived as leader
They did the very thing that the federal Tories did earlier: move to the middle because that is where the votes are. Harper would be a fool to align with a fringe party like Wildrose that has no chance at all of winning and will struggle to get into double digit seat territory. There is no gain at all for him. he won't do it privately or publicly.
Flanagan was part of Reform, which has been absorbed by the CPC and is not really a factor anymore. Wildrose was akin to Reform, which is why Flanagan is involved. It won't matter on election night.
Wildrose actually purged themselves from the PCs, which saved the PCs from a messy struggle.
#7
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:01 PM
Really, before you embarass yourself, do some reading...
oh really!
It appears MPs and organizers and activists with the federal party in Calgary and other areas of Alberta are ignoring the spirit of the party provision as they campaign and organize for the Wildrose Alliance—a right-of-centre movement that has been likened to the defunct Reform Party—as it attempts to oust the governing Progressive Conservative government in the province.
.
.
But political organizers for Immigration Minister Jason Kenney (Calgary Southeast, Alta.) aided Ms. Smith's leadership campaign last year, and the only member of the Wildrose Alliance so far elected to the Alberta Legislature represents a riding that is entirely within the boundaries of Mr. Harper's federal riding. His riding office is across an office hallway from Mr. Harper's constituency office. Conservatives say it is likely the Wildrose representative, Paul Hindman, was elected with the support of members of the federal party in Mr. Harper's riding.
.
.
Mr. Anders, who openly supports the Wildrose Alliance and describes himself as a friend of Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith, has been supported by the federal Conservative Party's governing council
by the by, I understand Harper's wife once helped in a Danielle Smith election campaign... and don't forget that cushy display between Harper and Smith during last years Calgary stampede - it's all about the optics, don't ya know!
in any case, why are you so jacked-up about suggestions/optics of Harper Conservative ties to the Wildrose? Is there a... problem?
#10
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:41 PM
You raised the topic, why not asnwer your own question: why are you so jacked up at what you see as Harpers government ripped asunder by Wildrose?in any case, why are you so jacked-up about suggestions/optics of Harper Conservative ties to the Wildrose? Is there a... problem?
You're dreaming. No, you are wet dreaming.
Liberals had 26% last election and got 9 seats. Wildrose would be thrilled to do that well this time. They won't though, because they will pick up zero of the Liberal votes available.
#11
Posted 10 February 2012 - 07:57 AM
I thought this was hilarious as well.
I have a feeling Wildrose will become much less "wild" to grab some votes.
#12
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:50 AM
I'm not certain you are familiar with the type of voters in Alberta that vote Liberal. There are a lot of "I'm a right-winger, but not extreme, but I'm opposed to the PC Party, and I'll never vote NDP" types that will go Wildrose. This might only be 4% or so of the total electorate, but it's enough to make a close second into a narrow victory in various seats.You raised the topic, why not asnwer your own question: why are you so jacked up at what you see as Harpers government ripped asunder by Wildrose?
You're dreaming. No, you are wet dreaming.
Liberals had 26% last election and got 9 seats. Wildrose would be thrilled to do that well this time. They won't though, because they will pick up zero of the Liberal votes available.
Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!
#13
Posted 12 February 2012 - 10:47 PM
#14
Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:11 PM
No, that is utter bullshit.I'm not certain you are familiar with the type of voters in Alberta that vote Liberal. There are a lot of "I'm a right-winger, but not extreme, but I'm opposed to the PC Party, and I'll never vote NDP" types that will go Wildrose. This might only be 4% or so of the total electorate, but it's enough to make a close second into a narrow victory in various seats.
The Liberals in Alberta were the same left -of- centre-but-not-NDP typically found all over Canada. Many of them came from elsewhere in the country, like so many Albertans in the last generation or so. The right of centre types within PC left to form Wildrose, and a whole bunch are mnoving back to PC now that they see they have no hope at all of coming anywhere near being anything of significance. The proof, again, of that is what happened with Ted Morton this time in the leadership race as compared to what happened with Morton in the last one.
Premier Alison Redford owes her somewhat surprising leadership win in part to disaffected Liberals who actively worked on her campaign selling memberships. They've given up on the Liberal Party of Alberta, a point driven sadly but firmly home when the Liberals elected a certifiable idiot as their new leader. It is the legacy of Stelmach, who knew that if the PCS moved to the middle with a new leader they would grab many Liberals, and they had already purged the party of the right. If Gary Mar had been elected, the result and direction of the PCS would be the same: hard to the middle, the safe ground vacated by a bankrupt Liberal Party.
#15
Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:58 PM
were recent iterations of the PCs actually... right-wing conservative or centrist? If nothing else, if one accepts your premise that, 'right-of-centre types bolted for the Wildrose', that suggests the PCs are a centrist party - which you actually acknowledge. Notwithstanding the many digs labeling them as, 'Redford Liberals'. In any case, I'm quite satisfied to have you highlight the movement of far-right members to the Wildrose... you know, the party closely aligned with the federal Harper Conservatives.The right of centre types within PC left to form Wildrose
how so? I read he's quite knowledgeable in terms of raising concerns over health care... stands to reason since he's a practicing emergency doctor, ya think?... the Liberals elected a certifiable idiot as their new leader.








