Jump to content


Photo

Which Conservatives are most likely to challenge Harper


23 replies to this topic

#1 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 22 February 2012 - 10:08 PM

The Australian Labour party crisis has me thinking

Lets say the backbenchers get restless and Harper's support within the CPC goes down... who are the most likely candidates to challenge Harper in a leadership vote

My obvious choice is Peter MacKay

I don't think it'd be Baird, he's too loyal

Any opinions?

#2 lukin

lukin

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,180 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:56 AM

The Australian Labour party crisis has me thinking

Lets say the backbenchers get restless and Harper's support within the CPC goes down... who are the most likely candidates to challenge Harper in a leadership vote

My obvious choice is Peter MacKay

I don't think it'd be Baird, he's too loyal

Any opinions?


Michael Ignatieff

#3 Boges

Boges

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:45 AM

Michael Ignatieff


What Bob Rae didn't want any of that? (It's only a matter of time before he spans the entire political spectrum right?) :rolleyes:

This is a stupid thread by a Harper hater. There's no way backbenchers are going to look to stab the PM in the back he's brought Conservatives back from the political wilderness.

The only way you'd see this happen is if you saw two factions develop (eg. Team Chretien, Team Martin) There's no evidence that will happen.

#4 cybercoma

cybercoma

    Posthuman Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,143 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:A Few Acres of Snow

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:57 AM

Brad Trost.

"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."

Thomas Jefferson


#5 fellowtraveller

fellowtraveller

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,830 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:14 AM

Svend Robbingstores
The government should do something.

#6 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:28 AM

What Bob Rae didn't want any of that? (It's only a matter of time before he spans the entire political spectrum right?) :rolleyes:

This is a stupid thread by a Harper hater. There's no way backbenchers are going to look to stab the PM in the back he's brought Conservatives back from the political wilderness.

The only way you'd see this happen is if you saw two factions develop (eg. Team Chretien, Team Martin) There's no evidence that will happen.


I can see it happen..the social conservatives getting tired of gay marriage and abortion all band together and take down harper

#7 Boges

Boges

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:38 AM

I can see it happen..the social conservatives getting tired of gay marriage and abortion all band together and take down harper


Not if they enjoy staying in power.

#8 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:40 AM

Not if they enjoy staying in power.


Harper has a tight grip on his party I know...but control freaks as leaders usually end up causing a lot of resentment and hard feelings among the group ..I've seen it first hand, it almost never fails
There will be a tipping point sometime

#9 Boges

Boges

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 11:52 AM

Harper has a tight grip on his party I know...but control freaks as leaders usually end up causing a lot of resentment and hard feelings among the group ..I've seen it first hand, it almost never fails
There will be a tipping point sometime


Of course you have no evidence to support the fact that any faction of CPC MP's are unhappy with Harper's leadership. :P

#10 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 12:10 PM

Of course you have no evidence to support the fact that any faction of CPC MP's are unhappy with Harper's leadership. :P


maybe not yet but maybe in 2 or 3 years, there will be

#11 Boges

Boges

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 01:56 PM

maybe not yet but maybe in 2 or 3 years, there will be


You do this all the time.

"I think _______ even though I have zero evidence to support my opinion therefore none of the other members can't debate my opinions. But that OK because it's how I feel and that's all that matters"

#12 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 02:03 PM

You do this all the time.

"I think _______ even though I have zero evidence to support my opinion therefore none of the other members can't debate my opinions. But that OK because it's how I feel and that's all that matters"



Read the OP, I offered a hypothetical scenario, do you know what that means?
It doesn't mean the situation is currently happening or is even going to happen
so why the hell do i need to give you evidence? good god man

Edited by olpfan1, 23 February 2012 - 02:04 PM.


#13 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 02:13 PM

You gave your opinion I just disagreed with it, that is how it goes
that is the nature of forums, if you want someone to agree with you go cry to your wife
who will agree with you just to shut you up

#14 Boges

Boges

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,087 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 02:29 PM

You gave your opinion I just disagreed with it, that is how it goes
that is the nature of forums, if you want someone to agree with you go cry to your wife
who will agree with you just to shut you up


http://thenextbarstool.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/wtf.jpg

The hypothetical nature of the thread is what I find perplexing.

It's like if I started a thread hypothetically saying the Quebec faction of the NDP will start their own party with Nationalist aims because it's obvious Bloc voters voted for them in the last election.

WTF is there to say about that?

#15 olpfan1

olpfan1

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Religious views: Deism

Posted 23 February 2012 - 03:15 PM

That could be a thread if you wanted it to be, hypothetical situations make the brain think
I wouldn't go into your thread and diss it, that is not cool



Reply to this topic