There's huge flaws in her argument, but you don't want to talk about them. Thanks for nothing then.I don't want to talk about flaws in her analysis, they are big.
Election 41 Fraud Thread: Robocalling, Misdirection, Vote Moving, etc.
#1486
Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:30 PM
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#1487
Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:53 PM
http://m.ctv.ca/tops...own-120312.html
Edited by Charles Anthony, 13 March 2012 - 09:22 AM.
deleted re-copied article; just post a brief quote instead
#1490
Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:00 PM
Conservative insiders insist they are not forcing Sona to take the fall.
Interesting comment.. i realize its not yours olpfan1 but a quote , however it begs the question..
Then What are Conservative Insiders doing?
Just curious..
#1492
Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:10 AM
the author never uses the term suppression - her focus is entirely the Elections Canada voter turnout data - the dependent variable... she speaks to depressed voter turnout as a measured effect of reported robocalls in the 27 identified ridings (2011 election relative to the 2008 election). You claim a legal aspect interference; however, the author categorically states, "It is important to note that my findings in no way can prove whether misconduct or an illegal act has occurred".Please, don't be fooled. The professor clearly states the suppression did happen. She simply tries to pretend she is objective and not interferring into legal aspect.
you know she is a recognized and published economics professor... yet choose to purposely denigrate her. She holds an economics doctorate and has published extensively - she has a cv with some substance.I read her paper completely. This is a typical pseudo-scientific crap coming from a professor of sociology (I know she's in the economics dept).
which is ~3% of the total of all registered voters within those 27 'targeted' ridings. At the lower bound... 1000/27000But her conclusions are stunning. In each of the 27 ridings, on average about 2500 non-conservative voters did not show up. It's 67,500 people!
the author provided no formal implication - the inference is yours. Your observation of the 'robocall effect' is noted: "districts with larger shares on non-conservative votes experienced a decline in turnout, while more Conservative leaning districts had higher turnout relative to the average".She "proves" that the 27 ridings were selected strategically. Implication is - by the Conservative Party. This must be a well organized nation-wide campaign. Supressed were only non-conservatives. Pro-conservative voters showed up in record numbers in those ridings.
the author states, "I obtained the list of those ridings that were allegedly targeted for voter demobilization using automated phone calls from the popular press and the online publications on the websites of the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party".By the way, the 27 ridings are those submitted by Bob Ray.
of course, in the interim dynamics, that 27 number has extended to possibly implicate 77 ridings with some degree of described 'voter irregularity'.
#1493
Posted 13 March 2012 - 04:56 AM
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2012/03/12/19492466.html
A Simon Fraser University professor says ...
olpfan - it looks like you cut/pasted an article here - this isn't permitted, please see the rules. You can cut/paste an excerpt (you should QUOTE that so it's obvious) and post the link as well as your comment to start discussion.
#1494
Posted 13 March 2012 - 06:26 AM
Edited by Topaz, 13 March 2012 - 06:26 AM.
#1496
Posted 13 March 2012 - 07:59 AM
Also, I noticed after visiting all three websites, only the Tories have not put on their site anything about robocalls or trying to find out who did it. http://ca.news.yahoo...s-28590332.html
Thats very unusual..
#1497
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:40 AM
They are not ''over the top'' like the rest of them. But if this guy is known, then he can't be a con, I am sure they would have leaked it by now. Could it be someone form the left?Thats very unusual..
#1498
Posted 13 March 2012 - 09:59 AM
Stuff like this just make the left look so juvenile.Do you think the most widespread case of election fraud in our country's history is amusing? That there shouldn't be consequences?
Why not hold an election? If you believe the Tories would still win anyway why not agree to call for re elections? or are you scurred
#1499
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:11 AM
Should be interesting.
With word we may not know anything for months or years, this robocall story is losing its legs quick. Not that it still isn't important, and maybe after months and years a bombshell will be dropped, however, more pressing things are emerging as concerns for both the media and the opposition.
#1500
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:34 AM
It will be interesting to see if Turmel leads off QP today with robocalls. I think there is a chance this may be the first QP in 3 weeks she won't. There is the CBC report out last night that civil servants pay outs will cost 2 billion and of course the drug shortages.
Should be interesting.
With word we may not know anything for months or years, this robocall story is losing its legs quick. Not that it still isn't important, and maybe after months and years a bombshell will be dropped, however, more pressing things are emerging as concerns for both the media and the opposition.
Budget is coming too. I'm almost sick of the robocall thing already. It got way too irrational way to fast.
I saw that report. 15 weeks severance for 1 year at the job. And the gov. will fork over 11 grand for education if you want to go back to school.
I also liked how Weston said that the last time this sort of thing happened all the former employees just went back to work as consultants.
How much is this downsizing going to 'save' since it is going to cost 2 billion?








