what? You don't think once the screws are tightened, Sona won't sing to protect his lily white?
Do follow the conversation waldo. It is Lib staffer Carroll punked and I were discussing, not Sona.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:24 AM
what? You don't think once the screws are tightened, Sona won't sing to protect his lily white?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:32 AM
no, it was a purposeful comment that you bit on. It's exactly what has been thrown back by Conservative supporters to diminish the role of Sona... to push it all off on one low-level guy conveniently thrown under the bus... with the cursory come-back, your like come-back, that, "we'll never know if it goes higher".Do follow the conversation waldo. It is Lib staffer Carroll punked and I were discussing, not Sona.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:42 AM
He wont sing. Even if he gets some extreme penalty like 5 years in prison he will be promised to be more then compensated when he gets out. Heck look where G. Gordon Liddy is after Watergate.no, it was a purposeful comment that you bit on. It's exactly what has been thrown back by Conservative supporters to diminish the role of Sona... to push it all off on one low-level guy conveniently thrown under the bus... with the cursory come-back, your like come-back, that, "we'll never know if it goes higher".
in any case, your deflection is noted... so let me ask again about that missing Harper apology to the House for Sona's actions. Any updates?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:13 AM
no, it was a purposeful comment that you bit on. It's exactly what has been thrown back by Conservative supporters to diminish the role of Sona... to push it all off on one low-level guy conveniently thrown under the bus... with the cursory come-back, your like come-back, that, "we'll never know if it goes higher".
in any case, your deflection is noted... so let me ask again about that missing Harper apology to the House for Sona's actions. Any updates?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:04 AM
no, the comment made reflects on the 'apology distinctions' in regards Sona vs. Carroll. Rae comes forward to the House revealing Carroll as the culprit and Rae offers an apology. Sona is thrown under the bus once the investigation starts honing in... and Sona is fired. Where's the comparable Harper apology in association with the Sona firing?Waldo, how can he apologize if he doesn't know if he or his party actually did something wrong?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:11 AM
no, the comment made reflects on the 'apology distinctions' in regards Sona vs. Carroll. Rae comes forward to the House revealing Carroll as the culprit and Rae offers an apology. Sona is thrown under the bus once the investigation starts honing in... and Sona is fired. Where's the comparable Harper apology in association with the Sona firing?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:13 AM
Nope he was kept on after messing with the ballot boxes, and hired by the party after the election. He was canned for the Robo calls remember?I thought Sona was fired for messing with a disputed ballot box location. Carroll was fired for an invasion of privacy.
Is it your position that the two are morally equivalent?
Or is it enough that the two names contained some of the same letters?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:18 AM
what invasion of privacy? As I understand it, as I read the varying analysis, anything on Vikileaks was so-called public knowledge.I thought Sona was fired for messing with a disputed ballot box location. Carroll was fired for an invasion of privacy.
Is it your position that the two are morally equivalent?
Or is it enough that the two names contained some of the same letters?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:20 AM
what invasion of privacy? As I understand it, as I read the varying analysis, anything on Vikileaks was so-called public knowledge.
but really, what are you about? Sona's Guelph ballot box antics were well established back during the election campaign... are you seriously now claiming that the recent days firing of Sona reflects back to the 9months+ dated Guelph incident?
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:29 AM
Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:38 AM
There is no mandatory minimum for stealing an election. This guy will land on his feet the Conservatives will make sure of it.Carroll's been found out and he's gone, its up to Vic to do anything more to him BUT Sona is in a better position because IF he knows anything more about who is behind this and the thoughts of going to prison and becoming someone elses wife, as they say, and being offered reduced jail time, I think he point the finger and by doing this he could become a bit of a hero to be the person who finally proves how dirty the party really is.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 12:10 PM
There is no mandatory minimum for stealing an election. This guy will land on his feet the Conservatives will make sure of it.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 12:51 PM