38 replies to this topic

[Michael Hardner]

Likewise I support crushing peoples skulls with a sledgehammer if they intentionally commit crimes like unsolicited murder, sober aggravated rape, and unnecessitated intentional maiming, on a hypothetical basis of course.

What is 'solicited murder' ? Why does drunk rape get different treatment than 'sober aggravated rape' ?

The no brainer issues should be obvious to any mature rational and good human.

The sledgehammer option... not exactly a "no brainer". Even you must admit that most people would give this idea a *little* thought ?

[j44]

What?

HAHAHA. This thread made my day.

and it is idiotic.

[Argus]

Social Justice is about insuring that people get treated fairly.

What is fair? I think fair is in the eyes of the beholder.
To some 'fair' is everyone being responsible for his own upkeep. To others, 'fair' means taking money away from the successful and giving it to the unsuccessful, without regard to the reasons why one is successful and the other is not. I believe in equality of opportunity, not equality of results.

No one who doesn't support human rights and free speech should have a tongue to speak.

Was that meant to be ironic? It just comes off as dumb. And as with 'fair' terms like 'human rights' and 'free speech' seem to be flexibly defined depending on ones ideological views.

We must liberate society with Social Justice, egalitarinism, and support of the fundamental human rights Canada turned away from in 2001. To fail to do so will only further entrench the totalitarian police state we are subject to today.

I don't know how old you are, but I'm going to presume you are painfully young, and know nothing, or very nearly nothing about the world. Certainly you have no idea what a 'police state' is.

[Argus]

I'd sooner kill them. It makes things easier to get rid of people who are obstructing a free society.

Are you Pol Pot's illegitimate son by any chance?

You clearly don't believe in human rights or free speech, despite claiming otherwise. Since you oppose human rights, that means you believe someone ought to be kill you, right?

Those who do not support values of freedom are a cancer and must be eradicated.

Well, that would be you.

[Tilter]

Well,

Why they are not doing a Leader election just as the NDP ??

Read my lips---- or print----- the CPC have the leader that about 50-^0 % of Canadians prefer over the non-leaders of the leaderless parties, why have a leader election when none is necessary. The BQ have the right idea--- ignore the fact that their party is dead and continue along as if they hadn't bee decimated a year ago.

[cybercoma]

Read my lips---- or print----- the CPC have the leader that about 50-^0 % of Canadians prefer over the non-leaders of the leaderless parties, why have a leader election when none is necessary. The BQ have the right idea--- ignore the fact that their party is dead and continue along as if they hadn't bee decimated a year ago.

This is some of the worst spinning I have ever read on this site.

[Tilter]

This is some of the worst spinning I have ever read on this site.

or so

[Liberator.]

This is a bot, right? There can't be an actual person behind this account. Its posts are incomprehensible.

Hide your gender,you will duped more people.

[Spiderfish]

I'd sooner kill them. It makes things easier to get rid of people who are obstructing a free society. God made us, we die, getting rid of the complications just makes society easier for everyone else.

Do you not see the glaring contradiction in your statement?

Free speech should only be limited by working contrary to the good of society or attacks against individuals so as to damage society or to degrade another individuals liberty. Things like spreading false information needs to be stopped.

Those who do not support values of freedom are a cancer and must be eradicated.

By your own measure, you are calling for your own self-eradication!