Cheney cancels speech in Canada due to safety concerns
#1
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:11 PM
CTV News
9/11 sucked, so then what about this?: "Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army
#4
Posted 19 March 2012 - 06:33 AM
Looks like Mr. Vice President Cheney was right based on the violent bonfire in London, Ontariario.
So when do we send NATO troops in to help the rebels?
ohm on soundcloud.com
#5
Posted 19 March 2012 - 06:53 AM
NATO should send troops to the US to support the Occupy rebels that are still being assaulted by a police regime that doesn't believe in free-speech.So when do we send NATO troops in to help the rebels?
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#6
Posted 19 March 2012 - 07:08 AM
NATO should send troops to the US to support the Occupy rebels that are still being assaulted by a police regime that doesn't believe in free-speech.
I can get behind that
ohm on soundcloud.com
#7
Posted 19 March 2012 - 07:46 AM
Looks like Mr. Vice President Cheney was right based on the violent bonfire in London, Ontariario.
BC, if the US would look after THEIR own people and keep out of other countries business, unless asked, perhaps the world would see more peace in the world. As far as what happen in London, it was wrong, but YOU shouldn't talk or do you want to talk about the US in the 1960's or were you born yet?
#8
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:05 AM
BC, if the US would look after THEIR own people and keep out of other countries business, unless asked, perhaps the world would see more peace in the world. As far as what happen in London, it was wrong, but YOU shouldn't talk or do you want to talk about the US in the 1960's or were you born yet?
Now let's pretend it's 1938...the last time America decided it was not going to police the planet.
Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
---Cletus
#9
Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:21 AM
Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
#10
Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:37 AM
If the left had their way, they'd make it so everyone that they disagree with wouldn't speak in Canada. In this case, it's just a pre-emptive shout down, which would have happened anyways. It's all part of their tolerance, and willingness to hear other ideas.
I don't blame him and you are right on the money.The last time he 'spoke' in Canada he was held for 7 hours before the lefties would disperse enough to allow safe exit from the venue.
Caveat:
The entered post in part or in entirety may be arbitratrarilly deemed, judged or ruled as trolling, incendiary, inciting or otherwise condemnable if there is a want to censor any individual that is targeted.
#11
Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:39 AM
Now let's pretend it's 1938...the last time America decided it was not going to police the planet.
Good thing they did in Europe or it would have all been red.
Tunnel vision is the only way some see their little anti-American world.
Caveat:
The entered post in part or in entirety may be arbitratrarilly deemed, judged or ruled as trolling, incendiary, inciting or otherwise condemnable if there is a want to censor any individual that is targeted.
#12
Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:46 AM
NATO should send troops to the US to support the Occupy rebels that are still being assaulted by a police regime that doesn't believe in free-speech.
Wow! When you pile it THAT high aren't you worried that it will tip over on you.
Seems to me the REAL 'assault' on rebels is happening in Syria, Egypt, Iran......
Western countries have rights for law which demands response if laws are broken by so called demonstrators, some with malicious intent. The USA like other democratic countries,is conceding occupiers latitude for demonstration and free speech within public laws OUR laws and constraints which the police are duly expected to enforce.
Your assessment is rather jejune and whiny.
Caveat:
The entered post in part or in entirety may be arbitratrarilly deemed, judged or ruled as trolling, incendiary, inciting or otherwise condemnable if there is a want to censor any individual that is targeted.
#13
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:12 AM
BC, if the US would look after THEIR own people and keep out of other countries business, unless asked, perhaps the world would see more peace in the world.
Nah...there would still be Canadian strike aircraft dropping bombs in other countries to "protect human rights". Thanks for the peace!!
As far as what happen in London, it was wrong, but YOU shouldn't talk or do you want to talk about the US in the 1960's or were you born yet?
Not only was I born, but the Americans knew how to throw a much better riot for a lot better reasons
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin
#14
Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:13 AM
Wow! When you pile it THAT high aren't you worried that it will tip over on you.
Seems to me the REAL 'assault' on rebels is happening in Syria, Egypt, Iran......
Western countries have rights for law which demands response if laws are broken by so called demonstrators, some with malicious intent. The USA like other democratic countries,is conceding occupiers latitude for demonstration and free speech within public laws OUR laws and constraints which the police are duly expected to enforce.
Your assessment is rather jejune and whiny.
Bit by bit, the right to protest and free speech is being eroded in the USA and Canada.
ohm on soundcloud.com








