Bullets storage rule, shot down
#1
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:01 AM
#3
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:36 AM
Why should only cops and criminals be armed? Cops can't protect, they only inspect or react or detect when they can get there. After the crime.
Criminals could give a shit about bullets and gun laws nor your safe storage. They might think twice if they knew we too were packing.
Edited by Peeves, 08 April 2012 - 08:37 AM.
Caveat:
The entered post in part or in entirety may be arbitratrarilly deemed, judged or ruled as trolling, incendiary, inciting or otherwise condemnable if there is a want to censor any individual that is targeted.
#4
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:38 AM
Bullets should be in my gun near where I lay or sit, or in my gun in my car when I travel, or in my gun in my pocket when I'm in a restaurant. The same with any other peaceful, non criminal type.
Why should only cops and criminals be armed? Cops can't protect, they only inspect or react or detect when they can get there. After the crime.
Criminals could give a shit about bullets and gun laws nor your safe storage. They might think twice if they knew we too were packing.
Nobody should be armed except the police. Nobody. Anyone else caught with a gun in an urban setting ought to be sent to prison for a very long time. Hunters can pick up their guns on their way out of town.
I'm okay with rural folk having guns because a gun can be a necessary tool in a rural area. That is not the case in an urban area.
#5
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:48 AM
Argus, you're an odd duck. The stuff I agree with you about, I really agree with you. The stuff I disagree with you about, I really disagree with you. Although we don't see eye-to-eye on everything, I like that you're principled.Nobody should be armed except the police. Nobody. Anyone else caught with a gun in an urban setting ought to be sent to prison for a very long time. Hunters can pick up their guns on their way out of town.
I'm okay with rural folk having guns because a gun can be a necessary tool in a rural area. That is not the case in an urban area.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#6
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:50 AM
No one is taking my gun away form me. I keep it safe, I treat it right, and I will never use it for violence.Nobody should be armed except the police. Nobody. Anyone else caught with a gun in an urban setting ought to be sent to prison for a very long time. Hunters can pick up their guns on their way out of town.
I'm okay with rural folk having guns because a gun can be a necessary tool in a rural area. That is not the case in an urban area.
Although if the people of Canada took this view point I would station my run at where ever we would the local gun depot I guess. Seems like an easy target though.
Edited by punked, 08 April 2012 - 08:50 AM.
#7
Posted 08 April 2012 - 08:51 AM
Argus, you're an odd duck. The stuff I agree with you about, I really agree with you. The stuff I disagree with you about, I really disagree with you. Although we don't see eye-to-eye on everything, I like that you're principled.
Principled?
I'm inclined to agree.
--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
#8
Posted 08 April 2012 - 09:14 AM
No one is taking my gun away form me. I keep it safe, I treat it right, and I will never use it for violence.
Sorry, is that your gun or your girlfriend you're talking about?
You might well be right, but the problem is when ten million people have them then you just know some are going to get drunk, some are going to get nuts, some are going to get robbed, etc. etc. So you don't make laws based on the good people but on the mass of people.
Although if the people of Canada took this view point I would station my run at where ever we would the local gun depot I guess. Seems like an easy target though.
Security would be fairly easily managed, and the cost vs having all those guns on the streets, well worth it. Besides, it is the strict laws which would help police things. If you get a year in jail for robbing a corner store but twenty years for robbing it with a gun, you'd probably decide not to use a gun.
Edited by Argus, 08 April 2012 - 09:14 AM.
#9
Posted 08 April 2012 - 09:15 AM
Sorry, is that your gun or your girlfriend you're talking about?
You might well be right, but the problem is when ten million people have them then you just know some are going to get drunk, some are going to get nuts, some are going to get robbed, etc. etc. So you don't make laws based on the good people but on the mass of people.
Security would be fairly easily managed, and the cost vs having all those guns on the streets, well worth it. Besides, it is the strict laws which would help police things. If you get a year in jail for robbing a corner store but twenty years for robbing it with a gun, you'd probably decide not to use a gun.
I could live with this.
#10
Posted 08 April 2012 - 10:04 AM
The only people that would have a problem with this, law or not, are those with a sick fantasy that they'll shoot someone. These people should have their weapons confiscated for the simple reason that they are clearly stupid.
#12
Posted 08 April 2012 - 10:24 AM
Depending on the circumstances (ie, it's proven they were negligent) they are.Anybody whos gun or ammunition is stolen from their house should be barred from ever owning anymore firearms
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#13
Posted 08 April 2012 - 01:22 PM
Nobody should be armed except the police. Nobody. Anyone else caught with a gun in an urban setting ought to be sent to prison for a very long time. Hunters can pick up their guns on their way out of town.
I'm okay with rural folk having guns because a gun can be a necessary tool in a rural area. That is not the case in an urban area.
How can you be so completely lacking in lucidity on some subjects and be so crystal clear on others by tearing the cover off the ball...Like this one????
Is it all part of the wonderfulness of Argus?
Ya' nailed this one...
#14
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:41 PM
Nobody should be armed except the police. Nobody. Anyone else caught with a gun in an urban setting ought to be sent to prison for a very long time. Hunters can pick up their guns on their way out of town.
I'm okay with rural folk having guns because a gun can be a necessary tool in a rural area. That is not the case in an urban area.
I agree mostly with this except that I think everybody should be able to have a gun IN THEIR HOME.(unless they have a history of violence or mental instability) Nobody should be allowed to walk around carrying one in a city except cops. Where you store the gun and bullets in your own home is no business of the state. It kind of defeats the purpose of having a gun in your home for protection if you have to have it locked up and the bullets stored seperately. It would take cops half an hour to drive to my house if I had to call them. By that time some psycho could have killed my whole family. why shouldn't I be able to keep my gun in my headboard of my bed, with a full clip, where it will actually do some good? I don't like violations of civil liberties from either side of the political spectrum.
#15
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:51 PM
I agree mostly with this except that I think everybody should be able to have a gun IN THEIR HOME.(unless they have a history of violence or mental instability) Nobody should be allowed to walk around carrying one in a city except cops. Where you store the gun and bullets in your own home is no business of the state. It kind of defeats the purpose of having a gun in your home for protection if you have to have it locked up and the bullets stored seperately. It would take cops half an hour to drive to my house if I had to call them. By that time some psycho could have killed my whole family. why shouldn't I be able to keep my gun in my headboard of my bed, with a full clip, where it will actually do some good? I don't like violations of civil liberties from either side of the political spectrum.
The point of NOT having guns everywhere, and imposing severe punishments on those who possess and use firearms illegally is that most psychos won't be able to GET guns to murder your family.
And the reason it might take cops half an hour to get to your house is because we don't have nearly enough of them, because we pay them far too much money.










