Jump to content


Photo

Bullets storage rule, shot down


183 replies to this topic

#181 GostHacked

GostHacked

    Watching you watching me.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,349 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON Canada

Posted 07 May 2012 - 01:30 PM

You have to get right up close to kill people with those things. You can't use them to kill, from a distance. Like when gun owners go on a murderous rampage...


No matter how safe you make things, accidents do happen, as do people who are committed to do the crime (even in a heat of passion) can and will use anything as a weapon.

I don't own any firearms, I do own a compound bow.... but there are at least 30 other things in my apartment I could use to cause you harm if you break into my home. Once you break into my home, in my view you forfeit your own rights, and I am going to make your day very very very miserable.

Criminals wouldn't bother doing that, since they don't care what happens to the gun if its re-acquired. That would only be something unscrupulous gun owners might do, or those who object to having their guns registered. The ballistics database would be helpful.


Criminals don't follow the rules, no matter WHAT rules you put in place.
Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser
ohm on soundcloud.com

#182 Derek L

Derek L

    F-35 Cheerleader Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,062 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beautiful British Columbia
  • Interests:Drinking scotch in the backroom of the old boys club.

Posted 07 May 2012 - 03:10 PM

Barrel removal of a scary looking Robinson Arms XCR:





50 seconds....


And installation:





To add, this scary looking rifle is non restricted, hence no requirement to register.

Edited by Derek L, 07 May 2012 - 03:12 PM.

The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.
-Barry Goldwater-

Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse, pulling a sturdy wagon.
-Winston Churchill-

Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
-Ronald Reagan-

#183 Manny

Manny

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,883 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 May 2012 - 04:50 PM

No matter how safe you make things, accidents do happen, as do people who are committed to do the crime (even in a heat of passion) can and will use anything as a weapon.

I agree, and said exactly the same thing a few posts back. I'm also generally against the concept of the nanny-state. But still, I'm no extremist in any of my views and I believe there needs to be reasonable safeguards in place in some things. If the safeguards are not a major inconvenience, and shown to be effective, if they are supported by experts in safety and by the people who are combating crime, I think it's a good idea. So gun registry was a good idea, in my view. Dismantling it and destroying the records made it an expensive waste. It's hard to fathom why this was so important, to a party that has some very bizarre views on reducing crime.

#184 Derek L

Derek L

    F-35 Cheerleader Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,062 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beautiful British Columbia
  • Interests:Drinking scotch in the backroom of the old boys club.

Posted 16 May 2012 - 03:31 PM

I agree, and said exactly the same thing a few posts back. I'm also generally against the concept of the nanny-state. But still, I'm no extremist in any of my views and I believe there needs to be reasonable safeguards in place in some things. If the safeguards are not a major inconvenience, and shown to be effective, if they are supported by experts in safety and by the people who are combating crime, I think it's a good idea. So gun registry was a good idea, in my view. Dismantling it and destroying the records made it an expensive waste. It's hard to fathom why this was so important, to a party that has some very bizarre views on reducing crime.


As said numerous times, there’s no evidence to suggest that the registry did reduce “gun crime”, since those that commit crime, are not likely to follow the laws anyways………Regardless, if another political party, at the federal or provincial level, tried to bring back a registry for long guns, the levels of compliance would be drastically worse then the previous levels………..During the registry, there were ~7. ½ million firearms registered, of an estimated ~21+ million private firearms within Canada……As has been demonstrated both here and with in the States, talk of gun control is the best trigger (pun) for an increase in gun and ammunition sales……..



Meanwhile, back at the ranch:

Feds' patience running out on 'backdoor' registries


The minister says it's still his intention to end the provincial practice of forcing gun shops to maintain paper-ledger records of rifle and shotgun purchases.

Toews praised New Brunswick for announcing Tuesday that it would stop trying to track long-guns sales on its paper ledgers to comply with the federal law that abolished the long-gun registry last month.



RCMP commissioner Bob Paulson has written to all CFOs to tell them federal law doesn't authorize them to run anything resembling a long-gun registry.




If the CFO’s and Provinces keeping pushing their luck, the government might have to look at scraping in it’s entirety Bill C-68....And dare I say PET’s portion pertaining to firearms of Bill C-150.…That’s the next “target”, to say nothing of a Canadian Castle Doctrine and issuing of ATCs to individuals
The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.
-Barry Goldwater-

Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse, pulling a sturdy wagon.
-Winston Churchill-

Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
-Ronald Reagan-



Reply to this topic