205 replies to this topic

[stopstaaron]

Lets face it, the chances of us getting attacked by the Russians or Americans for our natural resources would go drastically down
if we attained our own nuclear weapons .. and we would not need all of these jets

should we nuke up?

I say yes we should

Edited by stopstaaron, 09 April 2012 - 11:09 AM.

[Shady]

I think we should produce at least one nuclear missile.

[DogOnPorch]

Lets face it, the chances of us getting attacked by the Russians or Americans for our natural resources would go drastically down
if we attained our own nuclear weapons .. and we would not need all of these jets

should we nuke up?

I say yes we should

Great idea. We'll need some F-35s for weapon deployment.

Edited by DogOnPorch, 09 April 2012 - 11:13 AM.

[stopstaaron]

We sure as heck would not need 65 jets!

[DogOnPorch]

We sure as heck would not need 65 jets!

Of course not...just one and you can be the pilot!

[stopstaaron]

Of course not...just one and you can be the pilot!

if i were the pilot I think the plane would accidently go down over Alberta lol

[Signals.Cpl]

Lets face it, the chances of us getting attacked by the Russians or Americans for our natural resources would go drastically down
if we attained our own nuclear weapons .. and we would not need all of these jets

should we nuke up?

I say yes we should

During the cold war, I believe there was a lot of protests over Americans stationing nuclear missiles on Canadian soil, Can you imagine the actual public outcry if it was suggested? Try convincing people we need a nuclear power submarine before nuclear weapons.

[eyeball]

I think we should produce at least one nuclear missile.

We just need a few suitcase nukes.

Great idea. We'll need some F-35s for weapon deployment.

Purolator would probably be a lot cheaper.

Why would you need an F-35 to deliver a suitcase?

[stopstaaron]

During the cold war, I believe there was a lot of protests over Americans stationing nuclear missiles on Canadian soil, Can you imagine the actual public outcry if it was suggested? Try convincing people we need a nuclear power submarine before nuclear weapons.

I would not want American nukes here either.. people would feel better about it if it were Canadian made nukes

[DogOnPorch]

During the cold war, I believe there was a lot of protests over Americans stationing nuclear missiles on Canadian soil, Can you imagine the actual public outcry if it was suggested? Try convincing people we need a nuclear power submarine before nuclear weapons.

The beloved Arrow...armed with nukes????? Say it ain't so. Most Canadians under a certain age are purely unaware of Canada's romance with the Bomarc and the Genie.

Edited by DogOnPorch, 09 April 2012 - 11:22 AM.

[stopstaaron]

Getting nuked by Canada .. that would be humiliating to any country
that's the best detterent we'd have

[Shady]

We just need a few suitcase nukes.

Suitcase nukes are not nearly as effective, and don't provide a military deterrent. Those would be fine if we wanted to keep our capabilities a secret. But I'd want to make sure everyone knows that we have nuclear missile capability.

[Signals.Cpl]

Getting nuked by Canada .. that would be humiliating to any country
that's the best detterent we'd have

Try selling that to the Canadian Public.

[stopstaaron]

Try selling that to the Canadian Public.

we should at least have a national debate

[DogOnPorch]

We just need a few suitcase nukes.


Purolator would probably be a lot cheaper.

Why would you need an F-35 to deliver a suitcase?

Suitcase nuke...lol. Whatcha planning? Blowing-up the back sand lot? Deterent equal thermonuclear weapon...not puny l'il fission pop tarts. We'll need a few smart Jews.