Jump to content


Photo

Preston Manning vs Ed Broadbent


22 replies to this topic

Poll: PNP Debate (17 member(s) have cast votes)

If PNP gets the debate who would win...

  1. Preston Manning (6 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  2. Ed Broadbent (6 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  3. Everyone watching (lets hope they do it for charities) (4 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  4. Yawn.. this is boring (4 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 madmax

madmax

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,195 posts

Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:29 PM

Power and Poltics is looking to set up a debate with Manning and Broadbent.

Well I like both these guys..

I hope it happens...

Edited by madmax, 11 April 2012 - 08:21 AM.

the Conservative Communist Chinese Party of Canada. Putting Foreign Interests First :)

#2 TheNewTeddy

TheNewTeddy

    Calling out silly posts and ideas

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario

Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:11 PM

I respect Manning more than I do Broadbent, but I agree with the latter that the former is fudging the numbers.

Feel free to contact me outside the forums. Add "TheNewTeddy" to Twitter, Facebook, or Hotmail to reach me!


#3 WLDB

WLDB

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 150 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa
  • Interests:History, politics, space, wine

Posted 11 April 2012 - 07:28 AM

I'd say Manning. He seems more reasonable generally.
"History doesn't repeat itself-at best it sometimes rhymes"-Mark Twain

#4 capricorn

capricorn

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 11 April 2012 - 07:41 AM

Power and Poltics is looking to set up a debate with Manning and Broadbent.

Well I like both these guys..

I hope it happens...

What I'd like to know is what Mulcair thinks about this.

It would though, be interesting to watch.
"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

#5 fellowtraveller

fellowtraveller

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,830 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:48 AM

Is this going to be a cage match?
The government should do something.

#6 TwoDucks

TwoDucks

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 102 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:23 PM

Well, Manning seems a bit more wiry and quicker, but Broadbent seems like he'd have more power behind his jabs, so it's a tough call.

Wait, they're boxing, right?

#7 Jack Weber

Jack Weber

    Proud 4 time member of the MLW Cooler Cabal!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,861 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:movies,music,sports,history

Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:43 PM

Well, Manning seems a bit more wiry and quicker, but Broadbent seems like he'd have more power behind his jabs, so it's a tough call.

Wait, they're boxing, right?


Where's Howard Cosell when you need him?


Edited by Jack Weber, 11 April 2012 - 01:45 PM.

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

#8 RNG

RNG

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,489 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:To quote my wife, slightly to the right of Attila the Hun
  • Interests:Politics and economics

Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:11 PM

Any idea where and when? Will it be televised? I sure hope so.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.


#9 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:32 PM

When Broadbent openly supported Brian Topp, suggesting that a vote for Mulcair was somehow anti-NDP, I reckoned that Broadbent was becoming senile. He's now 76. Manning is almost 70.

Some people (and politicians) age well. Some don't.

Where's Howard Cosell when you need him?

Giggle.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#10 capricorn

capricorn

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:31 PM

When Broadbent openly supported Brian Topp, suggesting that a vote for Mulcair was somehow anti-NDP, I reckoned that Broadbent was becoming senile.

I figured he over estimated the influence he has on the party. I even wondered whether he was humiliated that his opinion was cast aside.
"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

#11 madmax

madmax

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,195 posts

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:11 PM

I figured he over estimated the influence he has on the party. I even wondered whether he was humiliated that his opinion was cast aside.


No, its vintage Ed Broadbent and vintage Democratic Party activity. Ed has always spoken his mind, and never tried to hide behind a false veneer. That is why people like him, cause he said what he thought. Some people are confusing the former leader as a person who was perfect or infallable, when infact, Ed behaved more like a normal person and not like a politician, in how we understand them to talk alot and say nothing. So, no Ed hasn't humiliated himself... infact, he hasn't changed a bit. That is what makes this debate so interesting. Two people with strong policy perspectives who actually speak their minds. Unless you believe that Preston Manning really wanted the Canadian Alliance to choose Stockwell Day over him.... and that he "Humiliated Himself". I would say that Mulcairs leadership of the NDP is likely to be a better performance then that which occurred under Stockwell day.

Eds Influence was the same as it was in the 70s and 80s, he was popular cause he said what he meant, he was often 2nd guessed or not followed...but he was always appreciated for his candidness and passion.

I think the same can be said for Manning.

I think both men and the institutions they have created are a good thing for Canadians.
the Conservative Communist Chinese Party of Canada. Putting Foreign Interests First :)

#12 capricorn

capricorn

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,120 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:21 PM

Eds Influence was the same as it was in the 70s and 80s, he was popular cause he said what he meant, he was often 2nd guessed or not followed...but he was always appreciated for his candidness and passion.

I think the same can be said for Manning.

I think both men and the institutions they have created are a good thing for Canadians.

Thanks for your perspective madmax. It helped clarify a misconception I had of Broadbent.
"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

#13 jbg

jbg

    Theresa Spence - my political hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,573 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NYC Area (40 Trudeau Units from NYC)
  • Interests:Politics, running, skiing

Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:04 PM

I respect Manning more than I do Broadbent, but I agree with the latter that the former is fudging the numbers.

I'd say Manning. He seems more reasonable generally.

They both seem like class acts and originals. I far prefer Broadbent to Mulcair.
Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
==============
Clarke Institute (link), home page for much of this site.
==============
Islamism and Communism (and Fascism)equal contempt of what the West represents - freedom and achievement (per Bob)

#14 Evening Star

Evening Star

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,027 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Regina SK

Posted 15 April 2012 - 12:38 AM

They both seem like class acts and originals. I far prefer Broadbent to Mulcair.

Really? On what grounds?

#15 Uncle 3 dogs

Uncle 3 dogs

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 105 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Regina
  • Interests:CFL football
    politics
    science & engineering

Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:34 PM

Boring.
Nothing new from either of them. Both are "principled", which means they never have to think about a position, just repeat all the same old same old.



Reply to this topic