Well I like both these guys..
I hope it happens...
Edited by madmax, 11 April 2012 - 08:21 AM.
Posted 11 April 2012 - 07:41 AM
What I'd like to know is what Mulcair thinks about this.Power and Poltics is looking to set up a debate with Manning and Broadbent.
Well I like both these guys..
I hope it happens...
Posted 11 April 2012 - 01:43 PM
Well, Manning seems a bit more wiry and quicker, but Broadbent seems like he'd have more power behind his jabs, so it's a tough call.
Wait, they're boxing, right?
Edited by Jack Weber, 11 April 2012 - 01:45 PM.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:32 PM
Giggle.Where's Howard Cosell when you need him?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:31 PM
I figured he over estimated the influence he has on the party. I even wondered whether he was humiliated that his opinion was cast aside.When Broadbent openly supported Brian Topp, suggesting that a vote for Mulcair was somehow anti-NDP, I reckoned that Broadbent was becoming senile.
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:11 PM
I figured he over estimated the influence he has on the party. I even wondered whether he was humiliated that his opinion was cast aside.
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:21 PM
Thanks for your perspective madmax. It helped clarify a misconception I had of Broadbent.Eds Influence was the same as it was in the 70s and 80s, he was popular cause he said what he meant, he was often 2nd guessed or not followed...but he was always appreciated for his candidness and passion.
I think the same can be said for Manning.
I think both men and the institutions they have created are a good thing for Canadians.
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:04 PM
I respect Manning more than I do Broadbent, but I agree with the latter that the former is fudging the numbers.
They both seem like class acts and originals. I far prefer Broadbent to Mulcair.I'd say Manning. He seems more reasonable generally.