Once again. The title of this thread is misleading as "Tennessee" has not said that hand holding is a gateway to sex; that is simply some people's interpretation of the bill.
Sorry, I was just trying to make someone laugh.... my bad.
Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:11 PM
Once again. The title of this thread is misleading as "Tennessee" has not said that hand holding is a gateway to sex; that is simply some people's interpretation of the bill.
Posted 16 April 2012 - 04:39 AM
Blackmore caused an uproar in March when he told his more than 900 students thet they were in a "no hugging school" because of some "incidents of unsuitable, physical interactions."
School Superintendent David Healy said at the time that the district has the responsibility to teach children about appropriate interactions. But he said no one would be disciplined for hugging.
PALM BAY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - A hug can brighten your day. It's so popular, there has even been a hug campaign around the world. But the gesture got some Palm Bay Southwest Middle School students into big trouble.
"I thought it was the most bizarre thing I've ever heard," said Nancy Crescente, the mother of 14-year-old Nickolas Martinez. "We're a cultural family and this is what we do."
Crescente said both her son and the 14-year-old girl who was the recipient of the hug were suspended. She says she wasn't notified about the suspensions until afterwards.
"They said this is what they do across the board, it is what it is. And that was that."
School administrators said a committee of parents approved the "no hugging" policy years ago, and there aren't plans to change it any time soon.
Edited by GostHacked, 16 April 2012 - 04:42 AM.
Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:39 AM
Why not let parents be responsible to teach their kids about sex? Why is this kind of thing left up to the state? Because when you do, this type of shit happens.
Parents take back control of your children and don't put up with this crap.
Posted 16 April 2012 - 08:19 AM
Why not ? Maybe because parents don't do it.
Posted 16 April 2012 - 08:58 AM
Not that simple.
What if they have children even though they shouldn't have?
Posted 16 April 2012 - 09:01 AM
And how is that the State's problem?
Posted 16 April 2012 - 10:16 AM
Dear TheNewTeddy,Dear Tennessee
My bare forearm once rubbed up against the bare forearm of another man
Does this mean I'm gay?
Posted 16 April 2012 - 10:34 AM
For that year, that study (which, btw, includes estimated numbers of pregnancies ending in miscarriage or stillbirth, so I question the accuracy of the reality), Tennessee is 9 and California is 15; other studies, other years, show different results. I was looking at earlier stats. In 2010, Tennessee fell to #10, as their rate of teen pregnancy fell in accordance with the rest of the country, in spite of their sex education classes stressing abstinence.It's not presented in the media, because what you say is not true! Lol
Tennessee is #9. California is #15.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf
Posted 16 April 2012 - 10:38 AM
You could make the same argument against education in general. Learned people decided long ago that certain burdens on society could be reduced with an educated populace. They experimented with a novel concept called public education whereby all children would learn things that it was to everyone's benefit that they know, and they even made it illegal to not send your kids to school.And how is that the State's problem?
Edited by BubberMiley, 16 April 2012 - 10:38 AM.
Si vous pouvez lire ceci, vous êtes un libéral.
Posted 16 April 2012 - 11:19 AM
Dear TheNewTeddy,
Once again I feel compelled to repeat that it's not Tennessee saying that holding hands is a gateway to sex. Tennessee is not putting out all the hyperbole. Once again I will point out that it is only some people's interpretation of the bill.
Sincerely,
American Woman
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:46 PM
Question do you think it will do them harm to learn about it?
Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:47 PM
Can you inform us as to what acts constitute a "gateway to sex" act?