60 replies to this topic

[jbg]

Not sure what your point is. You do realize that it's still voter fraud even if it didn't swing the election, right?

Depends on what Massachusetts law is on the subject. Clearly he's not a stranger to the state.

[American Woman]

Depends on what Massachusetts law is on the subject. Clearly he's not a stranger to the state.

So you think Massachusetts law might stipulate that it's not voter fraud if it didn't swing the election?

Being no stranger to the state has nothing to do with whether or not he committed voter fraud; no one has claimed that he did it unknowingly. He may very well have thought that he was privileged enough to get away with bending the rules, and no doubt he probably is.

[Shakeyhands]

Depends on what Massachusetts law is on the subject. Clearly he's not a stranger to the state.

I visit ridings all over Ontario, even have relatives in other ridings, does that give me the right to vote in them?

[Shady]

unless you can provide a quote, you have no idea how the Belmont city officials feel.

I already have. Perhaps you missed it.

[American Woman]

I already have. Perhaps you missed it.

So "city clerk" = "city officals?" - because that's the only quote I saw. And fyi, a city clerk can be either wrong, or on the wrong side of the law, too. Fact is, Mitt's son's property was inspected after the election in question, but if you want to believe that he chose to live in an unfinished basement over the two multi-million dollar homes that he owned at the time, that's your prerogative; and of course it goes without saying that you're going to apply the same standards to claims about Obama.

[Shady]

So "city clerk" = "city officals?"

Well, she's the one responsible for voter registration. Who else are we suppose to listen to? The fishmonger or the supposed GOP presidential candidate from 2010 Fred Karger, that are the sources for this particular story?

[punked]

So "city clerk" = "city officals?" - because that's the only quote I saw. And fyi, a city clerk can be either wrong, or on the wrong side of the law, too. Fact is, Mitt's son's property was inspected after the election in question, but if you want to believe that he chose to live in an unfinished basement over the two multi-million dollar homes that he owned at the time, that's your prerogative; and of course it goes without saying that you're going to apply the same standards to claims about Obama.

We also don't know where he paid his 2010 taxes and claimed residency on those because unlike EVERY other presidential candidate from his own father on he hasn't released more then one year of tax returns. It raises questions.

[Shady]

We also don't know where he paid his 2010 taxes and claimed residency on those because unlike EVERY other presidential candidate from his own father on he hasn't released more then one year of tax returns. It raises questions.

Definitely. Kinda like Obama not releasing his college transcripts. In fact, going through the trouble of having them sealed, unlike EVERY other presidential candidate. It raises questions.

[American Woman]

Well, she's the one responsible for voter registration. Who else are we suppose to listen to? The fishmonger or the supposed GOP presidential candidate from 2010 Fred Karger, that are the sources for this particular story?

Really? You think the city clerk knows Mitt was living in his son's unfinished basement? All she knows is what he claimed, Unless, perhaps, she attended one of his social events down there.

[Shady]

Really? You think the city clerk knows Mitt was living in his son's unfinished basement? All she knows is what he claimed, Unless, perhaps, she attended one of his social events down there.

Perhaps. Maybe you should ask her!

[punked]

Definitely. Kinda like Obama not releasing his college transcripts. In fact, going through the trouble of having them sealed, unlike EVERY other presidential candidate. It raises questions.

Yah except his collage transcripts wont show he is voting on one state and paying taxes (to get a lower rate) in another. Taxation with out representation is what the American revolution was all about. Now we might find out that a presidential candidate is voting in one place while avoiding his taxes in the same place. That is just wrong it would also point to another Romney lie.

That is a little different then Obama getting a C in a history class 30 years ago.

Edited by punked, 22 April 2012 - 11:15 AM.

[Shady]

Yah accept his collage transcripts wont show he is voting on one state and paying taxes (to get a lower rate) in another. Taxation with out representation is what the American revolution was all about. Now we might find out that a presidential candidate is voting in one place while avoiding his taxes in the same place. That is just wrong it would also point to another Romney lie.

That is a little different then Obama getting a C in a history class 30 years ago.

I'm just asking questions.

[punked]

I'm just asking questions.

What question are you asking? All I see is some false equivalence. Obama's taxes for the last 12 years are out there and guess what? He filed where he votes, owns a house and lives. Did Mitt? I am betting he didn't I am betting he paid his taxes in low tax rate New Hampshire.

[Shady]

What question are you asking? All I see is some false equivalence. Obama's taxes for the last 12 years are out there and guess what? He filed where he votes, owns a house and lives. Did Mitt? I am betting he didn't I am betting he paid his taxes in low tax rate New Hampshire.

What's Obama hiding and why?

[punked]

What's Obama hiding and why?

I don't know maybe you should suggest something like I have. I have suggested Romney has either committed voter Fraud or he is a tax cheat. He can not reside in two states. What would Obama's collage transcripts show?

I'll tell you what though. After the right wing attacked Derrick Bel a professor of Obama's who he introduced in 1991 I would be careful to release my transcript too. These people don't need to be attack because right wing loonies have already proven they are willing to go after anyone who Obama has so much looked at. His professors who would be on his transcripts don't deserve to be attack and the right has already proven they will do it with Derrick Bel. So I suggest to you he isn't hiding anything but protecting some people from the right attack machine. Prove me wrong.