Is MacKay a liar or can't count,?
#1
Posted 10 May 2012 - 06:38 PM
#2
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:00 PM
Open and transparent? Like hell.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#5
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:00 PM
"Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army
#7
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:51 PM
This is...strange. I was a pretty big defender of MacKay...
Why?
"Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army
#10
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:36 PM
I always thought he was a pretty smart middle of the road guy. Now I'm not sure what to think.
Don’t lose your faith…….LOL…….I’m sure these new scathing numbers are sunk costs that we’d have paid anyway……..Let’s see……..An average of 500-600 personal deployed for just under 8 months, say each non commissioned member, using a conservative estimate, makes ~$5000 a month and each officer about ~$7000 a month……….Let’s estimate between the ships crew and air force component there’s ~50 officers and 500 non commissioned members…..So that leaves us:
5000 x 7.5 x 500 = S 18750000
7000 x 7.5 x 50 = $ 2625000
There’s 21+ million, without counting benefits, danger pay, and any supporting personal back in Canada…….Now do these “new figures” also include a portion of the operating costs of the deployed unit’s home bases? Base personal? I’d truly love to see a breakdown of both the “old” and “new” costs…..
-Barry Goldwater-
Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse, pulling a sturdy wagon.
-Winston Churchill-
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
-Ronald Reagan-
#11
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:02 PM
I always thought he was a pretty smart middle of the road guy. Now I'm not sure what to think.
I'd wait before passing judgement. The other opposition/MSM accusations against him so far have turned out to be false. The chances that they're telling the truth this time is so remote, it's not worth wasting time thinking about anymore. They have a knack for adding in fixed costs for gotcha effect.
#12
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:55 AM
You guys are pretty transparent and your MO is pretty sad.
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Thomas Jefferson
#13
Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:45 AM
We all know about the difference in figures for the F-35, well MacKay has done it again with the mission in Libya. He reported in the House that the cost for the war was $50 Mil- 10 mil less than DND had predicted. What has been found in the DND report is it cost Canada $347.5 MILLION! 25 million for all those bombs the military dropped.
True cost of Libya mission was seven times gov't. estimate
As of Oct. 13, the figures that I've received have us well below ($60 million), somewhere under $50 million," MacKay told the CBC on Oct. 28, three days before the mission officially ended. "And that's the all-up costs of the equipment that we have in the theatre, the transportation to get there, those that have been carrying out this critical mission."
But buried in a report tabled in the House of Commons this week are Defence Department figures pegging the full cost of the mission at more than $347.5 million.
Even taking into account the Defence Department's controversial practice of only reporting "incremental costs" — those deemed to be above and beyond normal operating expenses — the mission still came in at $100 million, or almost twice what MacKay claimed.
I guess you haven't been following the purposeful JSFail F-35 low-ball manipulation, hey? As for Libya, can someone make sense of the OP linked quote... of the real numbers? Anyone? Are Maverick or the Goose on standby?I'd wait before passing judgement. The other opposition/MSM accusations against him so far have turned out to be false. The chances that they're telling the truth this time is so remote, it's not worth wasting time thinking about anymore. They have a knack for adding in fixed costs for gotcha effect.
well Mav, if you're going to try to chisel away at that $347 Million "full cost" figure, your $21 Million math wizardry barely makes a dent. In any case, war hawks keep tripping over the "full cost" versus "incremental cost" thingees. Even if you want to go with "incremental costs" (the cost for personnel and equipment that would not have been incurred if there was no Canadian Forces Libyan operation), per the OP quote, the $100 million actual incremental cost figure is twice what MacKay reported to Parliament. Double the incremental cost... but hey now, what did MLW member 'Bryan' just say?Don’t lose your faith…….LOL…….I’m sure these new scathing numbers are sunk costs that we’d have paid anyway……..Let’s see……..An average of 500-600 personal deployed for just under 8 months, say each non commissioned member, using a conservative estimate, makes ~$5000 a month and each officer about ~$7000 a month……….Let’s estimate between the ships crew and air force component there’s ~50 officers and 500 non commissioned members…..So that leaves us:
5000 x 7.5 x 500 = S 18750000
7000 x 7.5 x 50 = $ 2625000
There’s 21+ million, without counting benefits, danger pay, and any supporting personal back in Canada…….Now do these “new figures” also include a portion of the operating costs of the deployed unit’s home bases? Base personal? I’d truly love to see a breakdown of both the “old” and “new” costs…..
as for the source of those OP reported numbers... fully available on the National Defence and the Canadian Forces website... although I do note the page has a 'Date Modified: 2012-05-09' notation... just sayin










