Jump to content


Photo

Is MacKay a liar or can't count,?


59 replies to this topic

#1 Topaz

Topaz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,206 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 06:38 PM

We all know about the difference in figures for the F-35, well MacKay has done it again with the mission in Libya. He reported in the House that the cost for the war was $50 Mil- 10 mil less than DND had predicted. What has been found in the DND report is it cost Canada $347.5 MILLION! 25 million for all those bombs the military dropped. So what is the Speaker going to say about this one?? http://www.edmontonj...1885/story.html

#2 cybercoma

cybercoma

    Posthuman Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,143 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:A Few Acres of Snow

Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:00 PM

This is just getting ridiculous.

Open and transparent? Like hell.

"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."

Thomas Jefferson


#3 mentalfloss

mentalfloss

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 580 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:19 PM

Taking over government is becoming a walk in the palk for the NDP.

#4 WWWTT

WWWTT

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,743 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brampton
  • Interests:Building homes,learning Mandarin Chinese

Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:25 PM

I particularly look at the "above operating cost" for the mission that is at 100 million.

Misleading Canadians by 50 mill. is shame full!

I wouldn't trust McKay with a freekin penny!

WWWTT

#5 Moonlight Graham

Moonlight Graham

    Whipping My Caucus

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,883 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:farting into the wind

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:00 PM

MacKay and the CPC gov know that Canadians aren't the most supportive of spending big dough on military toys and adventures, so of course they must lie. MacKay is a lying sack of potatoes. He's wasting even more taxpayer money having to set up committees to investigate this nonsense. Like those potatoes, he should be sacked, or resign. He works for us, not against us.
"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice, without constraint." - Alexander Hamilton

"Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army

#6 Smallc

Smallc

    as in just a little

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,392 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Waterhen, Manitoba
  • Interests:Politics and Cars

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:12 PM

This is...strange. I was a pretty big defender of MacKay, but, it's getting harder.

#7 Moonlight Graham

Moonlight Graham

    Whipping My Caucus

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,883 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:farting into the wind

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:51 PM

This is...strange. I was a pretty big defender of MacKay...


Why?
"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice, without constraint." - Alexander Hamilton

"Did you know that today 27,000 children will die of preventable diseases such as diarrhea, measles, and malnutrition? That's the same as if an airplane full of children crashed every 16 minutes, killing everyone onboard." - Aug. 2005 edition of 'Warcry', official magazine of the Salvation Army

#8 Smallc

Smallc

    as in just a little

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,392 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Waterhen, Manitoba
  • Interests:Politics and Cars

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:23 PM

Why?


I always thought he was a pretty smart middle of the road guy. Now I'm not sure what to think.

#9 waldo

waldo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,021 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:38 PM

This is...strange. I was a pretty big defender of MacKay, but, it's getting harder.

just close your eyes and let the stench waft right over you... then remember

Freedom isn’t free

:lol:

#10 Derek L

Derek L

    F-35 Cheerleader Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,062 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beautiful British Columbia
  • Interests:Drinking scotch in the backroom of the old boys club.

Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:36 PM

I always thought he was a pretty smart middle of the road guy. Now I'm not sure what to think.




Don’t lose your faith…….LOL…….I’m sure these new scathing numbers are sunk costs that we’d have paid anyway……..Let’s see……..An average of 500-600 personal deployed for just under 8 months, say each non commissioned member, using a conservative estimate, makes ~$5000 a month and each officer about ~$7000 a month……….Let’s estimate between the ships crew and air force component there’s ~50 officers and 500 non commissioned members…..So that leaves us:

5000 x 7.5 x 500 = S 18750000

7000 x 7.5 x 50 = $ 2625000

There’s 21+ million, without counting benefits, danger pay, and any supporting personal back in Canada…….Now do these “new figures” also include a portion of the operating costs of the deployed unit’s home bases? Base personal? I’d truly love to see a breakdown of both the “old” and “new” costs…..
The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.
-Barry Goldwater-

Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse, pulling a sturdy wagon.
-Winston Churchill-

Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
-Ronald Reagan-

#11 Bryan

Bryan

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,333 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Winterpeg

Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:02 PM

I always thought he was a pretty smart middle of the road guy. Now I'm not sure what to think.


I'd wait before passing judgement. The other opposition/MSM accusations against him so far have turned out to be false. The chances that they're telling the truth this time is so remote, it's not worth wasting time thinking about anymore. They have a knack for adding in fixed costs for gotcha effect.

#12 cybercoma

cybercoma

    Posthuman Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,143 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:A Few Acres of Snow

Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:55 AM

See, it's the CPC. Wait until you pass judgement. :rolleyes:

You guys are pretty transparent and your MO is pretty sad.

"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free and civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as their religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."

Thomas Jefferson


#13 waldo

waldo

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,021 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:45 AM

We all know about the difference in figures for the F-35, well MacKay has done it again with the mission in Libya. He reported in the House that the cost for the war was $50 Mil- 10 mil less than DND had predicted. What has been found in the DND report is it cost Canada $347.5 MILLION! 25 million for all those bombs the military dropped.

True cost of Libya mission was seven times gov't. estimate

As of Oct. 13, the figures that I've received have us well below ($60 million), somewhere under $50 million," MacKay told the CBC on Oct. 28, three days before the mission officially ended. "And that's the all-up costs of the equipment that we have in the theatre, the transportation to get there, those that have been carrying out this critical mission."

But buried in a report tabled in the House of Commons this week are Defence Department figures pegging the full cost of the mission at more than $347.5 million.

Even taking into account the Defence Department's controversial practice of only reporting "incremental costs" — those deemed to be above and beyond normal operating expenses — the mission still came in at $100 million, or almost twice what MacKay claimed.


I'd wait before passing judgement. The other opposition/MSM accusations against him so far have turned out to be false. The chances that they're telling the truth this time is so remote, it's not worth wasting time thinking about anymore. They have a knack for adding in fixed costs for gotcha effect.

I guess you haven't been following the purposeful JSFail F-35 low-ball manipulation, hey? As for Libya, can someone make sense of the OP linked quote... of the real numbers? Anyone? Are Maverick or the Goose on standby?

Don’t lose your faith…….LOL…….I’m sure these new scathing numbers are sunk costs that we’d have paid anyway……..Let’s see……..An average of 500-600 personal deployed for just under 8 months, say each non commissioned member, using a conservative estimate, makes ~$5000 a month and each officer about ~$7000 a month……….Let’s estimate between the ships crew and air force component there’s ~50 officers and 500 non commissioned members…..So that leaves us:

5000 x 7.5 x 500 = S 18750000

7000 x 7.5 x 50 = $ 2625000

There’s 21+ million, without counting benefits, danger pay, and any supporting personal back in Canada…….Now do these “new figures” also include a portion of the operating costs of the deployed unit’s home bases? Base personal? I’d truly love to see a breakdown of both the “old” and “new” costs…..

well Mav, if you're going to try to chisel away at that $347 Million "full cost" figure, your $21 Million math wizardry barely makes a dent. In any case, war hawks keep tripping over the "full cost" versus "incremental cost" thingees. Even if you want to go with "incremental costs" (the cost for personnel and equipment that would not have been incurred if there was no Canadian Forces Libyan operation), per the OP quote, the $100 million actual incremental cost figure is twice what MacKay reported to Parliament. Double the incremental cost... but hey now, what did MLW member 'Bryan' just say?

as for the source of those OP reported numbers... fully available on the National Defence and the Canadian Forces website... although I do note the page has a 'Date Modified: 2012-05-09' notation... just sayin :lol:

#14 Manny

Manny

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,883 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:14 AM

Besides "liar" and "can't count", a third option is "incompetent".

#15 Topaz

Topaz

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,206 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:31 AM

Besides "liar" and "can't count", a third option is "incompetent".



OR, he knows Harper will never can him and he feels he can do whatever he wants. At least, his dad knew when to resign.



Reply to this topic