No this is absolutely wrong. Im not a big fan utopian libertarianism and a lot of Ron Pauls stuff is crazy but on this point you are absolutely wrong.
The ONLY reason that the disparity of wealth has exploded since the 70's is because of the modern banking system and the massive ammounts of monetary expansion. The banks created trillions apon trillions of dollars out of thin are and the wealthy got their hands on almost all of it for two reasons...
1. The money was loaned into existance and people with lots of wealth and income qualified to borrow way more of it than the other classes.
2. Wealthy people and people with high incomes had the infrastructure (investments, and businesses) to chase down and corral all that new money that was dumped into the system.
The modern banking system is the most regressive creation in the history of democracy. Under the gold standard the gap between the rich and poor steadily shrank and the middle class emerged. The ability of the government to fund itself through inflation and monetary expansion allowed governments to slash top bracket tax rates, and the wealthy used all this new money to effectively wrestle control of the government away from the people.
Basically what happened is that the middle and lower class has about the same ammount of money as they did in 1971... even a tiny bit more, which kept them from turning activist. But ALL of that new money created under the fiat system was essentially divided up amongst the wealthy thus the huge explosion in disparity.
Im not personally a gold standard bug like Mr Paul but the fact is that if Ron Paul had his way this disparity of wealth would have been physically impossible. The dollars simply would not exist. The wealthy could have only grown the "gap" by taking money directly from the lower classes and this would have immediately caused a huge fight that the wealthy would have lost.
That may all be true...
Mr. Paul is also an unabashed supporter of Right to Work legislation.We know this is corporate driven legislated union busting to artificially keep wages and benefits down under the guise of "individual worker rights and freedom"..
He let it slip in one of the debates that he feels the US requires a national RTW strategy to "compete" with the low wages that are seen in places like China.That's not "freedom",that's corporate tyrrany!Especially when one delves into who is really behind Right to Work...
So,either Mr. Paul is truly naive in thinking RTW is really about individual workers rights and freedoms in the workplace (which means he's completely clueless and infantile) or,he's a mouthpiece for the scary people behind Right to Work legislation (which makes him an ignorant elitist)...
Edited by Jack Weber, 14 May 2012 - 02:30 PM.