Harper vs Trudeau
#1
Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:21 AM
#2
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:07 AM
If only he could undo Bi-lingualism it would make him the most forward looking PM ever. Having said that, it makes Rene Levesque the most forward looking Provincial premier ever ---- He did it for his province.An Ottawa paper has done a comparison between Pierre Trudeau and Harper and it is a interesting debate. Even though Harper is undoing anything that has Liberals name on it, in the end some other PM will come along and UNDO some of the things that Harper is doing. It will be interesting to see what happens to Canada after the Harper era is finished and done with. http://www.ottawacit...2952/story.html
Funny thing---- the very province for which Bi-lingualism was instituted is the only province that isn't.
Edited by Tilter, 13 May 2012 - 08:09 AM.
#3
Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:39 PM
If only he could undo Bi-lingualism it would make him the most forward looking PM ever. Having said that, it makes Rene Levesque the most forward looking Provincial premier ever ---- He did it for his province.
Funny thing---- the very province for which Bi-lingualism was instituted is the only province that isn't.
I'm pretty certain you don't understand what you're talking about.
#4
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:35 AM
As I often argue here, Canadian federal politics are all about region, not ideology.
Unless he changes perceptions, Harper will lose Ontario. Why? Swing southern Ontario voters will not vote for a federal leader without poll support in Quebec. Why? Without Quebec, Canada no longer exists and Ontario becomes Michigan, and Toronto is another Detroit.
----
Based on this latest regional play, I reckon that Mulcair will be our next federal PM.
Edited by August1991, 14 May 2012 - 02:49 AM.
#5
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:44 AM
If only he could undo Bi-lingualism it would make him the most forward looking PM ever. Having said that, it makes Rene Levesque the most forward looking Provincial premier ever ---- He did it for his province.
Funny thing---- the very province for which Bi-lingualism was instituted is the only province that isn't.
#7
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:26 AM
Unless he changes perceptions, Harper will lose Ontario. Why? Swing southern Ontario voters will not vote for a federal leader without poll support in Quebec. Why? Without Quebec, Canada no longer exists and Ontario becomes Michigan, and Toronto is another Detroit.
Actually, the entire about paragraph is wrong, so, I'll just disregard it.
#8
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:33 AM
No---You don't understand what I'm talking about. Ever lived in Quebec, owned a business in Quebec or tried to educate your kids in Quebec? When the PQ virtually outlawed English in Quebec he violated the rights of every resident and when he "notwithstood" out of the constitutional rights of Quebeckers he became a dictator to about 1/2 of the population, virtually eliminating the language rights of all Anglophones in Quebec instituting illegal laws that are still standing today.I'm pretty certain you don't understand what you're talking about.
Edited by Tilter, 14 May 2012 - 06:39 AM.
#10
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:38 AM
Of course harper is no trudeau, and thank god for that. You sound like trudeau is a god or something instead of being one of the worst PM's this country ever had.Make no mistake, so far, Harper is no Trudeau. Harper has (possibly) lost Quebec.
As I often argue here, Canadian federal politics are all about region, not ideology.
Unless he changes perceptions, Harper will lose Ontario. Why? Swing southern Ontario voters will not vote for a federal leader without poll support in Quebec. Why? Without Quebec, Canada no longer exists and Ontario becomes Michigan, and Toronto is another Detroit.
----
Based on this latest regional play, I reckon that Mulcair will be our next federal PM.
#11
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:22 AM
As I often argue here, Canadian federal politics are all about region, not ideology.
No. It's still about idealogy. That's democracy how democracy works everywhere in the world. The fact that idealogy changes significantly from region to region in Canada is notable, but by no means unique. It's the same in the USA. The only difference is that we have Quebec, whose idealogy is so completely removed from the rest of Canada that it's almost impossible to find common ground.
Unless he changes perceptions, Harper will lose Ontario. Why? Swing southern Ontario voters will not vote for a federal leader without poll support in Quebec. Why? Without Quebec, Canada no longer exists and Ontario becomes Michigan, and Toronto is another Detroit.
Wait...what on Earth are you talking about? Ontario becomes Michigan without Quebec? Please explain, because that makes no sense at all. Harper may very well lose Ontario (I'd love to vote for someone else), but it would have nothing to do with Quebec. Ontario is idealogically much closer to the West than it is to Quebec, despite what you'd like to think. Mulcair and the NDP will flop in Ontario everywhere outside of Northern Ontario and bits of Toronto and London....just like they always do. Thank Rae for that.
"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
#12
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:34 AM
Huh?Actually, the entire about paragraph is wrong, so, I'll just disregard it.
Trudeau was certainly no God (and certainly not in my book) but I call them as I see them. Regions, not ideology, drive Canada's federal politics. And it is impossible to form a federal government without regional support.Of course harper is no trudeau, and thank god for that. You sound like trudeau is a god or something instead of being one of the worst PM's this country ever had.
Harper has alienated Quebec voters (the Conservatives are simply not on the radar anymore) and this is visibly apparent through polls to many southern Ontario voters. As a result, they will not vote CPC.
Look, alot can happen in 3 years but as long as Mulcair offers a reasonable alternative, I simply don't see the Tories going much above 10% in Quebec and as a result, much above 30% or so across the country. That's what Harper is polling now, and it won't change.
And in a wedge election, the Liberals will be sliced and diced and Mulcair will be on the majority side.
Edited by August1991, 14 May 2012 - 07:38 AM.
#13
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:43 AM
Wait...what on Earth are you talking about? Ontario becomes Michigan without Quebec? Please explain, because that makes no sense at all. Harper may very well lose Ontario (I'd love to vote for someone else), but it would have nothing to do with Quebec. Ontario is idealogically much closer to the West than it is to Quebec, despite what you'd like to think. Mulcair and the NDP will flop in Ontario everywhere outside of Northern Ontario and bits of Toronto and London....just like they always do. Thank Rae for that.
MB - Ontario doesn't like parties that poke at the sovereignty hornet's nest. Ontarians want Canada to stay together. This is, I think, what is meant by 'Ontario is Michigan without Quebec'.
#14
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:44 AM
Huh?
He's echoing my sentiment. You seem completely out of touch with Ontario.
Trudeau was certainly no God (and certainly not in my book) but I call them as I see them. Regions, not ideology, drive Canada's federal politics. And it is impossible to form a federal government without regional support.
Trudeau alienated the West for 35+ years and counting. It's been a wasteland for the Liberals ever since. He did more to divide the country than any PM ever as, disregarding the attention he paid to Quebec separatism.
Harper has alienated Quebec voters (the Conservatives are simply not on the radar anymore) and this is visibly apparent through polls to many southern Ontario voters. As a result, they will not vote CPC.
People in southern Ontario care little for how people in Quebec are feeling. We don't talk about it. We don't worry about it. We don't really think about it. As to the 'polls', they're not even worth considering at this point. We're 3 years from an election and Harper doesn't even really have a coherent opposition yet. Mulcair JUST became party leader, the Liberals are invisible and the BQ is dead.
Look, alot can happen in 3 years but as long as Mulcair offers a reasonable alternative, I simply don't see the Tories going much above 10% in Quebec and as a result, much above 30% or so across the country. That's what Harper is polling now, and it won't change.
And in a wedge election, the Liberals will be sliced and diced and Mulcair will be on the majority side.
Mulcair and the NDP don't present a reasonable alternative. That's the problem. I would love it if the Liberals got their act together, but it seems unlikely. The Liberal Party has always been idealogically closer to the PC/CPC than to the NDP. It's more likely that, should they be sliced and diced, the Conservatives would benefit more. We saw the same phenomena elsewhere in the Commonwealth, where a centrist collapse led to conservative pre-eminence.
If we examine things further, however, it's even more likely that your scenario won't materialize. Most of the NDP's seats are from Quebec. Ontario's 'idealogy' is so far removed from that of Quebec that if the NDP aims to cater to their base there, they'll struggle to win any new votes here. The spectre of Bob Rae's NDP days is still very real as well, and we saw very clearly what happened to Conservative support once it looked like the NDP was a contender ---> the Conservatives won the GTA.
MB - Ontario doesn't like parties that poke at the sovereignty hornet's nest. Ontarians want Canada to stay together. This is, I think, what is meant by 'Ontario is Michigan without Quebec'.
The comment was inane Michael. That was what I was getting at. Ontario doesn't really want Quebec to leave, that's true. I feel that way myself, despite holding much of Quebec in contempt. Truth is that it would be economically disastrous for Eastern Canada for Quebec to leave, but it would be unmitigated catastrophe for Quebec itself. They can bluster all they want, but only the diehards and the vapid actually want it to happen.
Edited by Moonbox, 14 May 2012 - 08:48 AM.
"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
#15
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:55 AM
The comment was inane Michael. That was what I was getting at. Ontario doesn't really want Quebec to leave, that's true. I feel that way myself, despite holding much of Quebec in contempt. Truth is that it would be economically disastrous for Eastern Canada for Quebec to leave, but it would be unmitigated catastrophe for Quebec itself. They can bluster all they want, but only the diehards and the vapid actually want it to happen.
Inane but true ?
"People in southern Ontario care little for how people in Quebec are feeling. We don't talk about it. We don't worry about it. We don't really think about it."
This is true now, but if separation talk returns you can bet that Ontario will care.










