85 replies to this topic

[Fletch 27]

You do know that "newspapers" aren't "real time" right?

Um yea, back to Pat Martin and the 5 million dollar law-suit for defamation. Check your mailbox or front step tomorrow grandpaw... Sheesh

Of course you don't. That's because you have your ears plugged and your fingers...never mind.
I cited it yesterday.

But the Globe and Mail currently has the Del Mastro story at the top of the page. You can't just wish it will go away.

[gunrutz]

Has there been some sort of decision made about the circumstances of the robocalls? Some of you make it sound like it has been decided who was responsible.

[Fletch 27]

YES! The Liberals and NDP have declared them "guilty"... The decision from the rest of the country unfortunatley rests on a decision what others call "judicial process"... And due process... Its sickening!!! We need to "burn more witches"!!!!!!!!! What do you do when Bob Rae speaks??? "BURN even MORE witches"!!!!!!!

Canadian democracy in action.... Fook the majority... "I can yell "burn the witches" louder than you can"!!!!

Has there been some sort of decision made about the circumstances of the robocalls? Some of you make it sound like it has been decided who was responsible.

[WWWTT]

Sooooo your saying change or amend a law when it fits the NDP's behavior? Okay, now I get it.... Kinda figured you attended union meetings... What laws like theft and harrasment, sexual or other have you managed to get changed or "fitted" to suit your brotheren? Laws are laws... We don't change them cuz it makes the guilty "un-guilty". Or, maybe it's just "confusing".

Sure why not?

Never stopped the conservatives,liberals or the pc when they were in power before!

Or will it now become taboo for the NDP to amend and change laws when they get their mandate from the Canadian voters in 2015?

As far as changing laws in the fields of criminal acts,if you're suggesting my colleagues and I routinely conduct in criminal activity simply because we are proud union members than maybe I should complain to the admin. here and see that you receive at least a two week suspension!

WWWTT

[BubberMiley]

You do know that "newspapers" aren't "real time" right?

You do know that "newspapers" have "websites," right?

Check your mailbox or front step tomorrow grandpaw... Sheesh

My stars! I didn't think you would resort to name-calling after you complained so bitterly about being called Flecher.

[Fletch 27]

I think that calls for an example when the Tories have amended the rules to suit their party.. Please.. We are all waiting

Soooo, you agree there is a majority mandate now from the majority of Canadians? Please confirm.

Love,
Fletch

Sure why not?

Never stopped the conservatives,liberals or the pc when they were in power before!

Or will it now become taboo for the NDP to amend and change laws when they get their mandate from the Canadian voters in 2015?

As far as changing laws in the fields of criminal acts,if you're suggesting my colleagues and I routinely conduct in criminal activity simply because we are proud union members than maybe I should complain to the admin. here and see that you receive at least a two week suspension!

WWWTT

[Fletch 27]

Ummmm, u called me "felcher".....I'm ok with that, I'm a big boy but your name calling Is after all, against the rules of this "forum". But the NDP is ok with breakin da law so I don't blame you for the same leftist tacticts. Mind you, there is a 5 million dollar defamation suit on one well known NDP"er now.. Colors never change...

Typical....
No, let's call it "fitting"...

You do know that "newspapers" have "websites," right?

My stars! I didn't think you would resort to name-calling after you complained so bitterly about being called Flecher.

Edited by Fletch 27, 07 June 2012 - 06:24 PM.

[BubberMiley]

Ummmm, u called me "felcher"....

So I did. I must have been on my blackberry. I still don't see how that qualifies as name-calling though.

But you're still okay with Vic Toews breaking the law?
Wow. We could go back and forth for days...

[waldo]

Um yea, back to Pat Martin and the 5 million dollar law-suit for defamation. Check your mailbox or front step tomorrow grandpaw... Sheesh

Mind you, there is a 5 million dollar defamation suit on one well known NDP"er now.. Colors never change...

hey, as you say, Grandpa... wasn't the Pat Martin lawsuit dropped? Speaking of sounding off outside of Parliamentary privilege, what about Harper's own defamation suit, hey?

[Signals.Cpl]

So I did. I must have been on my blackberry. I still don't see how that qualifies as name-calling though.

But you're still okay with Vic Toews breaking the law?
Wow. We could go back and forth for days...

Can you use specific cases of how he broke the law?

[BubberMiley]

Can you use specific cases of how he broke the law?

How many times do I have to cite the same article?

[Fletch 27]

YES!!!!! It was!!!!! After a 2 page appology and admitting being a stupid idiot! Read it!

Its a funny letter... The Tories never had to write one! Lololol.. He got schmuckered!

hey, as you say, Grandpa... wasn't the Pat Martin lawsuit dropped? Speaking of sounding off outside of Parliamentary privilege, what about Harper's own defamation suit, hey?

[Signals.Cpl]

How many times do I have to cite the same article?

As many times as required, your point therefore you provide the proof... as many times as required

[BubberMiley]

I would have to agree that Pat Martin has a big mouth that he should learn to control.
I'm also not surprised that Flelch has no comment on Harper's defamation suit or the money taxpayers had to pay to defend him.

[cybercoma]

In the news does not equal guilty. The guilt you speak of is just your personal opinion not fact.

Guilty was the plea from the Conservative Party for fraud.