81 replies to this topic

[Fletch 27]

Do we trust the biased media on children killed (photos's faked) or do you trust the arab spring....

Photos's of children killed is Syria have been proved fake.. Yet the media blows over it... The Media has up till now pointed to the head of state for the killings... Who would fake it? Does killing children further their cause?

Would the Syrian Gov fake this? Or would the minority rebels for sympathy in the global view?
The syrian Gov Incriminating themselves or are the rebels to blame for the slaughter or children? Again, photos were proved FAKE! Hmmm

Is the minority in Syria grabbing the lime-light? In Egypt, we now have the Muslim brotherhood as Mubarach was a "butcher".. Are we sure we have this right or is the media playing to our hearts?
Again, how much do you trust your media? Do you think tje rebel cause is more worthy than the Syrian gov?

http://www.rys2sense...hp?f=11&t=29153

We are killing ourselves through media... The images shown are brutal but 11 years old. The CBC, Global news, CNN and BBC showed these as last weeks news..

Yes, trust your media..

Edited by Fletch 27, 12 June 2012 - 09:34 PM.

[Anti-Am]

I don't trust the media as far as I can throw it.

[Fletch 27]

Denmark is currently in emergency session over these pictures and evaluating the reply given what seems to be over 30 falsified images.... Yay the nasty rebels...(To whom we have been backing)

[Anti-Am]

Denmark is currently in emergency session over these pictures and evaluating the reply given what seems to be over 30 falsified images.... Yay the nasty rebels...(To whom we have been backing)

I want no part in liberation of any country unless there is an invasion.
Who knows what the real truth is.

[Moonlight Graham]

Do we trust the biased media on children killed (photos's photos faked) or do you trust the arab spring Arab Spring....

Photos's Photos of children killed is Syria have been proved proven fake.. Yet the media blows over it... The Media media has up till until now pointed to the head of state for the killings... Who would fake it? Does killing children further their cause?

Would the Syrian Gov gov fake this? Or would the minority rebels for sympathy in the global view? (Huh?)
The syrian Gov Incriminating themselves Is the Syrian gov incriminating itself or are the rebels to blame for the slaughter or of children? Again, photos were proved proven FAKE! Hmmm

Is the minority in Syria grabbing the lime-light limelight? In Egypt, we now have the Muslim brotherhood Brotherhood as Mubarach Mubarak was a "butcher".. Are we sure we have this right or is the media playing to our hearts?
Again, how much do you trust your media? Do you think tje the rebel cause is more worthy than the Syrian gov?

http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29153

We are killing ourselves through media... The images shown are brutal but 11 9 years old. The CBC, Global news News, CNN and BBC showed these as last weeks week's news..

Yes, trust your media..

Somewhat fixed.

[Anti-Am]

Denmark is currently in emergency session over these pictures and evaluating the reply given what seems to be over 30 falsified images.... Yay the nasty rebels...(To whom we have been backing)

Can't find anything on google or twitter about this.

[Michael Hardner]

http://www.telegraph...n-massacre.html

Are we saying that the massacres didn't happen though ? Are we saying that we should let Syria kill their people this way ?

[Manny]

I see, so now we're using photos of the dead bodies the west essentially created in Iraq, to incense the public and justify that we need to do same thing to people in Syria.

[Signals.Cpl]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.html

Are we saying that the massacres didn't happen though ? Are we saying that we should let Syria kill their people this way ?

We have so far, and I can't see that changing anytime soon.

[Michael Hardner]

So, Manny, are there any circumstances where military intervention is justified ?

Signals.Cpl - you're ok with continuing as we have done ?

[Anti-Am]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.html

Are we saying that the massacres didn't happen though ? Are we saying that we should let Syria kill their people this way ?

It is civil war. Why are you suggesting we get involved in a civil war? We're not the worlds policemen.

[Signals.Cpl]

Signals.Cpl - you're ok with continuing as we have done ?

No I am not, but don't see anyone willing to act. There are few nations capable of acting, and the most likely and capable is the US, but no matter how sad it is or how horrible the situation is as soon as the US sets foot on Syrian soil there would be people crying about the oil and imperialism and all that... Besides as it is an election year I don't see the Us starting a war there.

[Anti-Am]

Syria is 74% Sunni. Why should we always come to the rescue of Muslim countries?
They frickin' hate the west. There will not be peace over there for decades to come and
that is being generous.

[bleeding heart]

No I am not, but don't see anyone willing to act. There are few nations capable of acting, and the most likely and capable is the US, but no matter how sad it is or how horrible the situation is as soon as the US sets foot on Syrian soil there would be people crying about the oil and imperialism and all that... Besides as it is an election year I don't see the Us starting a war there.

So let me get this straight...you think that if the US intervened, it would automatically be for good, humanitarian reasons...reasons of principle.

As it always is, such as....um......

And yet they'd meet with all sorts of crazy protests....however, they also can't undergo this principled stance...because it's an election year.



So...it's not about principle, is what you're saying.

[Signals.Cpl]

So let me get this straight...you think that if the US intervened, it would automatically be for good, humanitarian reasons...reasons of principle.

As it always is, such as....um......

And yet they'd meet with all sorts of crazy protests....however, they also can't undergo this principled stance...because it's an election year.



So...it's not about principle, is what you're saying.

If there is pressure for someone to intervene, lets be honest and say who that nation will be, it will be the US. Whatever reasons they might have to go to Syria are irrelevant. Why you ask? Because people are dying, and then there are westerners who cry for action at which point the only nation that is capable of mounting any action might be forced to act, but as soon as they act they become aggressive. Regardless of how noble the cause is they will be the bad guy.

If you are about to die, and I save your life, does it matter why I did that? If my actions save your life, and I am doing so for a monetary reward so be it, wouldn't you agree?