Jump to content


Photo

Current Govt worse than ignorant


123 replies to this topic

#1 guyser

guyser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,503 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 01:03 PM

Interesting that this gentleman , a constitutional expert, claims that Harpers govt is worse than ignorant , more like disgusting , by misleading (deliberately) the public on the validity of the coalition govt.



http://www.straight....rather-ignorant

It would appear that pretty much what he says is true and paints not a rosy picture of what went on.

My question is, where was the media in all that. I guess the msm isnt so Liberal huh?

Edited by guyser, 26 June 2012 - 01:05 PM.


#2 Tilter

Tilter

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton On

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:23 PM

Interesting that this gentleman , a constitutional expert, claims that Harpers govt is worse than ignorant , more like disgusting , by misleading (deliberately) the public on the validity of the coalition govt.



http://www.straight.com/article-718136/vancouver/constitutional-experts-calls-stephen-harper-government-officials-disgusting-rather-ignorant

It would appear that pretty much what he says is true and paints not a rosy picture of what went on.

My question is, where was the media in all that. I guess the msm isnt so Liberal huh?

Has any Canadian government been better than ignorant?
McKenzie King screwed the pooch, Trudeau screwed Canadian Anglos, Diefenbaker screwed the Air Industry and the Armed forces, Kreetin screwed the country, Martin screwed the Liberal party & John Turner & Kim Campbell screwed themselves and Mulroony screwed us all.

#3 g_bambino

g_bambino

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,715 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:50 PM

Interesting that this gentleman , a constitutional expert, claims that Harpers govt [was] misleading (deliberately) the public on the validity of the coalition govt.

Some of us [*cough* like me *cough*] were aware of that ages ago.

My question is, where was the media in all that.

Following the whole thing. It's just that the majority of the media is ignorant of the rules of parliamentary democracy.

#4 guyser

guyser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,503 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:14 PM

Some of us [*cough* like me *cough*] were aware of that ages ago.


Oh I was sure you knew all about this. You tend to be spot on in matters of constitution and monarchy stuff .

And you got to toot your own horn!

Woot! :D

#5 Smallc

Smallc

    as in just a little

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,392 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Waterhen, Manitoba
  • Interests:Politics and Cars

Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:22 PM

What am I, black? jk

#6 guyser

guyser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,503 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:28 PM

What am I, black? jk

No no, I rely on your expertise to solve...um...lets see....



Hey look! A groundhog !







:ph34r:

#7 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,619 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:46 PM

more like disgusting , by misleading (deliberately) the public on the validity of the coalition govt.

Yawn. Libs and the NDP would have used exactly the same rhetoric if it suited them. For evidence look at the number of Libs/Dippers claiming that the CPC is undemocratic because it was elected by a minority of voters.

#8 dre

dre

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,674 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:09 PM

Yawn. Libs and the NDP would have used exactly the same rhetoric if it suited them. For evidence look at the number of Libs/Dippers claiming that the CPC is undemocratic because it was elected by a minority of voters.



Fascinating to see how the partisan firewall youve contructed in your mind isolates you from any possible critical thought.

No matter what your party does, you can just say "so and so would have done it to!" or "so and so did the same thing way back when".

Government corruption? NO problem! Other parties are corrupt too!

GOvernment incompetence? NO problem! Other parties are incompetent too!

Contempt for the voters! Its cool man! Theyre all doin it today!

Bugger a small child? No worries! I bet Jack Layton would have buggered THREE!

#9 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,619 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:19 PM

No matter what your party does, you can just say "so and so would have done it to!" or "so and so did the same thing way back when".

All it means is I have low opinion of all politicians and I simply don't believe that any other batch of yahoos is going to be any better. Now if the conservatives started doing things that actually mattered like passing regulations designed to shutdown money making industries then I would start to complain. So far they seem to be getting the important stuff right.

I also have no patience for partisan yahoos who raise a lot of noise about irrelevant issues when they know that if the tables were reversed they would defend their party for doing exactly the same thing.

Edited by TimG, 26 June 2012 - 04:22 PM.


#10 g_bambino

g_bambino

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,715 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:24 PM

And you got to toot your own horn!

No, I clearly just had a bit of a cough... ;)

#11 g_bambino

g_bambino

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,715 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:28 PM

I also have no patience for partisan yahoos who raise a lot of noise about irrelevant issues when they know that if the tables were reversed they would defend their party for doing exactly the same thing.

I'm not sure that Peter Russell is a "partisan yahoo".

#12 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,619 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:34 PM

I'm not sure that Peter Russell is a "partisan yahoo".

He is only whining about conservative rhetoric. He makes no mention of the libs/dippers who claim that the conservative government is 'undemocratic' because it was elected with a minority of the popular vote. These kinds of one sided attacks make him a partisan even if he does not intend to be.

That said, it may not be his fault since he is only being asked questions presented by a partisan media. He might have equal distain for the libs/dippers but we will never know that thanks to the biased media.

Edited by TimG, 26 June 2012 - 04:40 PM.


#13 Smallc

Smallc

    as in just a little

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,392 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Waterhen, Manitoba
  • Interests:Politics and Cars

Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:52 PM

No no, I rely on your expertise to solve...um...lets see....



Hey look! A groundhog !







:ph34r:


:(

#14 socialist

socialist

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Piss me off and I will expose you.

Posted 26 June 2012 - 05:03 PM

this goverment is destroying my canada. we need mulcair and the ndp and we need them now before harper turns this into dick cheyney ville. all students in all public schools need to be taught how the cons are destroying are enviroment and our nation.
social justice is a right for all

#15 TimG

TimG

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,619 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 June 2012 - 05:14 PM

this goverment is destroying my canada.

Muclair would destroy "your" Canada by killing the economy with regulations, taxes and deficits. No one gives a damn about the environment if they can't find a job.

Edited by TimG, 26 June 2012 - 05:15 PM.




Reply to this topic