Jump to content


Photo

Quebec marginalized


144 replies to this topic

#91 dre

dre

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,701 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 02:51 PM

I doubt that, there is a gap and it's already pretty large and that is due to Quebec but a portion of the blame goes to the federal parties of the last few decades who have been trying to buy the Quebec vote no matter how harmful it is to the country. If Quebec realizes that the party that forms government does not need them then it might change their point of view, as long as the CPC treats Quebec just like any other province then everything is alright.



A few tards does not a gap make.

I dont know ANYONE outside of these forums that care much about this at all. Most Canadians arent sitting around worrying about Quebec.

#92 Wild Bill

Wild Bill

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,530 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Ontario
  • Interests:building/repairing guitar amps (tube based)
    politics, sci-fi

Posted 02 July 2012 - 03:26 PM

WB, in this long thread, this idea is the most disturbing of all.

You define making money as paying taxes. Your definition of a rich society is one in which the government collects alot of tax revenue.

IMHO, your definition of wealth is troubling and even terrifying. According to you, WB, Alberta is rich because its government can collect taxes. WB, is the State's ability to collect taxes the measure of a society's wealth?


In what context, August? As far as providing jobs and income, Alberta is richer than Ontario, at this point in time.

In the context of culture, Newfoundland has the rest of the country beat for music and fun, hands down!

Just as money by itself can be cold, it's hard to party when your kids are hungry.
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw


"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

#93 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 02 July 2012 - 04:30 PM

Myself, I've lived here all my life. I don't know ANYBODY who gives a damn what Quebec thinks about Harper or much of anything else, for that matter!

But IME/IMK, southern WASP Ontarians loved/voted for Roman Catholic Laurier, St-Laurent, Trudeau and Chrétien. Why? They were Quebec federalists.

And without Canada, Ontario is, well, just another Michigan; and Toronto is just another Detroit.

Imagine.

Edited by August1991, 02 July 2012 - 04:49 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#94 Rocky Road

Rocky Road

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 239 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta.
  • Interests:Art, Basketball, Mental Health, Travel.

Posted 02 July 2012 - 05:50 PM

But IME/IMK, southern WASP Ontarians loved/voted for Roman Catholic Laurier, St-Laurent, Trudeau and Chrétien. Why? They were Quebec federalists.

And without Canada, Ontario is, well, just another Michigan; and Toronto is just another Detroit.

Imagine.


Vive Canada!
We need to encourage Quebec federalism and continue integration of our societies. We are all one.

#95 Wild Bill

Wild Bill

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,530 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Ontario
  • Interests:building/repairing guitar amps (tube based)
    politics, sci-fi

Posted 02 July 2012 - 06:03 PM

But IME/IMK, southern WASP Ontarians loved/voted for Roman Catholic Laurier, St-Laurent, Trudeau and Chrétien. Why? They were Quebec federalists.

And without Canada, Ontario is, well, just another Michigan; and Toronto is just another Detroit.

Imagine.


August, I feel you are trying to argue strategic points with emotional patriotism. That just can't work.

As I have said several times, I too want a united Canada. However, my feelings are not going to change a damn thing as far as how things are REALLY working!

It is a fact that Quebec has very different values than TROC, perhaps far more in tune with the NDp than the Tories. They are not likely to embrace much of Harper's team unless he becomes very much more leftwing in his approach.

It is also a fact that this would hurt his support in TROC quite deeply.

How we feel about this is quite irrelevant. It is what it is!

It is a far smarter move for Harper to protect and encourage his support in TROC than to try to appeal to Quebecers. He has already learned he can get a majority without Quebec.

If that doesn't make Quebec irrelevant I don't know what else does! How do our feelings change such facts?

Do you have any other ideas as to what the CPC could do next election? THAT WOULD WORK?

Or do you think Harper SHOULD try to cater to Quebec and thus lose his majority?

Because make no mistake about it August, that is indeed the reality of the situation. Your conception of the values of TROC are completely at odds with that of all of us who live here!

Have you ever lived for an extended period of time in TROC, August? Frankly, you always sound very much the typical introverted, parochial French Canadian. I don't mean this to be insulting. It works quite similarly in reverse with we Anglos towards Quebec, as I am sure most Quebecers have always known quite well.

If we are ever going to get past all this and be a truly united country we are going to have to deal with realities as they are and not confuse it with the desires of our heart.
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw


"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

#96 Vineon

Vineon

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 79 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:31 PM

All I have is a big *yawn* for the sovereignty argument. Montreal isn't interested.


Is Montréal all there is in Québec?

Is "Greater Montréal" actually not interested?

#97 Vineon

Vineon

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 79 posts

Posted 02 July 2012 - 09:36 PM

Is Montréal all there is in Québec?

Is "Greater Montréal" actually not interested?


They can grow up once the bluff of separation from Canada is called. Once they see that TROC don't care wether they stay or not they will rethink their position. What the government needs to do is remove all those special rights that Quebec get that other provinces don't get, let them threaten separation and when TROC shows them the door, I highly doubt they will think twice about leaving Canada and will likely start playing nice with the rest of us.


As a separatist myself, this is a "gamble" I dream Canada would take.

#98 Signals.Cpl

Signals.Cpl

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,649 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario

Posted 03 July 2012 - 06:43 AM

As a separatist myself, this is a "gamble" I dream Canada would take.

As a person living in TROC I would really like to see it as well, the second Quebec leaves the country every issue they have advanced in the name of the Quebec cause will be stricken down, Quebec will automatically lose over 10% of their provincial income yet gain much more in expenses as it would be the national government. Quebec citizens lose Canadian citizenship and and get a passport that won't take them very far, they will lose dozens if not hundreds of companies that would move or be forced to move to Canada, no more protection for your dairy farmers and there go your secure markets as well.


Economy that is in the gutters, a passport that is only useful for toilet paper, the fact that you will shoulder 1/4 of the federal debt on top of your provincial debt while trying to get a new currency going, as well as looking for new markets to sell the overpriced products coming out of your farms... not to mention the exodus of english and bilingual people in Quebec who will prefer to keep a Canadian passport and live in a prosperous country rather then live in a country with an unemployment rate that will be 2-3 times our current unemployment rate. Add to that the little fact that with your collapsing economy you cannot maintain a military of any kind and will force you to cut police budgets which will likely destroy any tourist industry you MIGHT have after separation but on top of that likely both Canada and the US will see Quebec as a security threat and thus will close off the borders and there goes the rest of your economy. Ten years after separation you will be the proud recipient of food aid from NGO's, post-secondary education costs will be through the roof, no universal healthcare, no early retirement and by early I mean retirement before the age of 80 because no old age security...


In a few years good old Quebec will be knocking on the door of Canada asking to be back in, and guess what if Canada as a whole decided to accept Quebec back in every special right, every little privilege that TROC had given to Quebec will be gone, no more bilingualism, and no more political power because threatening separation well will be an empty threat. Quebec will be in a much worse position post separation than TROC, and those spoiled and entitled little brats who protest tuition hikes will have much more to protest if it ever came to Quebec separating.
Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst

#99 Wild Bill

Wild Bill

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,530 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Ontario
  • Interests:building/repairing guitar amps (tube based)
    politics, sci-fi

Posted 03 July 2012 - 06:48 AM

As a separatist myself, this is a "gamble" I dream Canada would take.


You are entitled to your dream, Vineon. While I would prefer to have a united Canada I would respect a free and democratic choice from Quebecers.


Where I take exception is when I hear outright ridiculous claims from BQ and PQ leaders that the separation would be painless and that it would not hurt Quebec financially - that TROC would cheerfully support a common currency and be all warm, loving and fuzzy about dividing up assets and responsibities.

This is just romantic crap! TROC would be hurt and angry! Any politician who appeared to be soft on a separation agreement towards Quebec would be committing political suicide!

Remember, when Quebec no longer had seats to offer a party it would immediately become irrelevant to the fortunes of a politician and his party.

In the long run I believe Quebec would adjust to being a separate nation but a lot of people would be hurt in the meantime.
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw


"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

#100 westguy

westguy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 295 posts

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:52 AM

As a person living in TROC I would really like to see it as well, the second Quebec leaves the country every issue they have advanced in the name of the Quebec cause will be stricken down, Quebec will automatically lose over 10% of their provincial income yet gain much more in expenses as it would be the national government. Quebec citizens lose Canadian citizenship and and get a passport that won't take them very far, they will lose dozens if not hundreds of companies that would move or be forced to move to Canada, no more protection for your dairy farmers and there go your secure markets as well.


Economy that is in the gutters, a passport that is only useful for toilet paper, the fact that you will shoulder 1/4 of the federal debt on top of your provincial debt while trying to get a new currency going, as well as looking for new markets to sell the overpriced products coming out of your farms... not to mention the exodus of english and bilingual people in Quebec who will prefer to keep a Canadian passport and live in a prosperous country rather then live in a country with an unemployment rate that will be 2-3 times our current unemployment rate. Add to that the little fact that with your collapsing economy you cannot maintain a military of any kind and will force you to cut police budgets which will likely destroy any tourist industry you MIGHT have after separation but on top of that likely both Canada and the US will see Quebec as a security threat and thus will close off the borders and there goes the rest of your economy. Ten years after separation you will be the proud recipient of food aid from NGO's, post-secondary education costs will be through the roof, no universal healthcare, no early retirement and by early I mean retirement before the age of 80 because no old age security...


In a few years good old Quebec will be knocking on the door of Canada asking to be back in, and guess what if Canada as a whole decided to accept Quebec back in every special right, every little privilege that TROC had given to Quebec will be gone, no more bilingualism, and no more political power because threatening separation well will be an empty threat. Quebec will be in a much worse position post separation than TROC, and those spoiled and entitled little brats who protest tuition hikes will have much more to protest if it ever came to Quebec separating.

Quebec will be a third world basket case within a few weeks of leaving Canada. They will lose the billions they get from TROC in transfer payments which allows and lowest daycare in the country. Godd riddance.

#101 westguy

westguy

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 295 posts

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:54 AM

Yes. Anyone but them would be better.

naame one

#102 bleeding heart

bleeding heart

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,691 posts

Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:49 AM

I dont know ANYONE outside of these forums that care much about this at all. Most Canadians arent sitting around worrying about Quebec.



:)

That's true. We hear gripes about Quebec like we hear gripes about Ottawa, and about employers, and the weather, and our own provinces, and about how crappy the Transformers movies are.

Only the last one is a universal and objective truth, uncontroversial and inarguable......
“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

#103 Rick

Rick

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 818 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:01 AM

naame one

I'll go you one better, westmanguy I'll name two. The NDP or the CPCML would be infinitely better than the wastes of skin in power currently.

Edited by Rick, 06 July 2012 - 08:02 AM.

“This is all about who you represent,” Mr. Dewar (NDP) said. “We’re (NDP) talking about representing the interests of working people and everyday Canadians and they [the Conservatives] are about representing the fund managers who come in and fleece our companies and our country.

Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2011

#104 Signals.Cpl

Signals.Cpl

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,649 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:10 AM

I'll go you one better, westmanguy I'll name two. The NDP or the CPCML would be infinitely better than the wastes of skin in power currently.

NDP? The country will be broke within 2 years should they EVER get elected.
Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst

#105 Rick

Rick

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 818 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:38 AM

NDP? The country will be broke within 2 years should they EVER get elected.

:rolleyes:

As if anyone could do worse than the party of crooks and cons which you support.
“This is all about who you represent,” Mr. Dewar (NDP) said. “We’re (NDP) talking about representing the interests of working people and everyday Canadians and they [the Conservatives] are about representing the fund managers who come in and fleece our companies and our country.

Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2011



Reply to this topic