Jump to content


Photo

Olympics 2012 in London


  • Please log in to reply
205 replies to this topic

#1 RB

RB

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,157 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:54 PM

For the past week or so there is so much prime time coverage of the US Olympics trials and final names to compete in the 2012 games. Since I am a sports fanatic I am really cluded in the US trials and UK trials also. But, I feel quite like an American supporter

I have no idea when we will be introduced to our Canadian team. I meant, are we not proud to show off our athletes or am I missing when the promotions are on :(

#2 bush_cheney2004

bush_cheney2004

    Senior Mocker

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,036 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA! USA! USA!

Posted 03 July 2012 - 09:14 PM

Swimming:

http://www.swimtrials.ca/


Track and Field:

http://www.2012trials.ca/


Gymnastics:

http://www.gymn.ca/

Boxing:

http://www.facebook....203701756315890
Economics trumps Virtue.
"Access to a wait list is not Access to healthcare" - Chief Justice Beverly McLauchlin

#3 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 04 July 2012 - 01:54 PM

I have no idea when we will be introduced to our Canadian team. I meant, are we not proud to show off our athletes or am I missing when the promotions are on :(

Whoever they are, I wish that no taxpayer money was involved.

If you want to run around in circles quickly, do it on your own dime - or the money of a voluntary sponsor. There are for more deserving recipients of taxpayer money than tall, sleek, physically fit athletes born with chance genetics.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#4 guyser

guyser

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,503 posts

Posted 04 July 2012 - 02:43 PM

Whoever they are, I wish that no taxpayer money was involved.

Hmm....

If you want to run around in circles coming up with social programmes you cannot afford, or always having to ensure there is a Quebec version of a nat'l programme , do it on your own dime - or the money of a voluntary sponsor. There are for more deserving recipients of taxpayer money

Sorry, had to fix it for you.

ETA

The point is there are benefits of a society that embraces and enjoys physical fitness , spin offs to our children and society as a whole.

Edited by guyser, 04 July 2012 - 02:45 PM.


#5 wyly

wyly

    Senior Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,543 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 July 2012 - 03:27 PM

Hmm....

Sorry, had to fix it for you.

ETA

The point is there are benefits of a society that embraces and enjoys physical fitness , spin offs to our children and society as a whole.

and the best spin-off of all a healthier society, lower healthcare costs...

not that I'm a great fan of the Olympics any more...
“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

#6 RB

RB

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,157 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 05 July 2012 - 07:32 PM

Whoever they are, I wish that no taxpayer money was involved.

Since I do contribute to the tax system I can also have my say; that sports is an integral part of how we identify, and position ourselves in the world besides keeping fit and reducing burden on the health system. It is no different from landing a plane with Canadian Flag in a different country, or sending mail using stamps. So I support the allocation of funds to sports.

It's a time when all Canadians are truly bonded and proud to see their countrymen and women go for the gold.

I recall the last winter Olympics, the newspaper ran an article on how to cope with stress when not winning a medal - this was very early in the competition. You are talking about a lot of Canadians being stressed - I understand a few people don't get the sports "fever" and I am optimistic they eventually come around when they are much older and have leisure time to contemplate meaning. I know 'cause I see them at the pool everyday.

Edited by RB, 05 July 2012 - 07:36 PM.


#7 RB

RB

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,157 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 05 July 2012 - 07:36 PM

repeat post

Edited by RB, 05 July 2012 - 07:36 PM.


#8 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:34 PM

Stuck in this hotel room, late at night, I flipped through the channels and saw part of this opening ceremony.

Is it not ironic that Greece is the first counrry to enter the arena?

I'm appalled at the narrow-minded, 19th century nationalism in this whole exercise. Even Danny Boyle's opening production is a missed chance to celebrate the internationalism of the English language and English law. Instead, it's a bizarre history of the UK. What does the NHS have to do with the Olympics?

----

I dream of a day when the State has nothing to do with sports and athletes enter the arena as individuals. Failing that, let them enter by their continent.

Since I do contribute to the tax system I can also have my say; that sports is an integral part of how we identify, and position ourselves in the world besides keeping fit and reducing burden on the health system. It is no different from landing a plane with Canadian Flag in a different country, or sending mail using stamps. So I support the allocation of funds to sports.

RB, simply because you pay taxes does not mean that the State should spend money on your pet desire. I pay taxes and I also like onions; does that mean the State should spend tax money on onion production?

As to your fitness/health argument, if you go to the gym and look hot, that benefits you personally. Why should fat/lazy people pay you money to make you look "hotter"?

And as to your "identify/position" argument, millions of Canadians going about their ordinary life - whether in Canada or abroad - will establish our reputation well enough. When the Canadian state strays far from a limited role, it is likely to hurt our reputation and give us a negative position.

By your logic, RB, I could justify having Canadian taxpayers finance this Maple Leaf Forum, send cheques to posters here, on the grounds that this forum "identifies and positions" Canada on the World Wide Web. Because of this forum, available to everyone around the world, we Canadians show ("identify/position") ourselves to be civilized.

Edited by August1991, 27 July 2012 - 04:20 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#9 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,723 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 27 July 2012 - 04:28 PM

For those who don't know, here's my Why I Hate The Olympics Rant.

I may be in a minority now but I know that if we remain civilized, in the future, more will agree with me.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#10 -TSS-

-TSS-

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 552 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland
  • Interests:Politics all over the world.

Posted 27 July 2012 - 06:36 PM

When I investigated the earlier olympic records it turned out to be so that in the 1976 games Canada was the first ever and only since host-country which failed to win a single gold-medal.

That is unlikely ever to be repeated as in the future only the big countries can afford to host the olympic games.

#11 The_Squid

The_Squid

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,423 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver Island

Posted 27 July 2012 - 08:00 PM

When I investigated the earlier olympic records it turned out to be so that in the 1976 games Canada was the first ever and only since host-country which failed to win a single gold-medal.

That is unlikely ever to be repeated as in the future only the big countries can afford to host the olympic games.


LOL

An achievment not soon duplicated! Canadian pride swells at the thought!

#12 jacee

jacee

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,926 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:ON
  • Interests:Justice

Posted 27 July 2012 - 11:50 PM

For those who don't know, here's my Why I Hate The Olympics Rant.

I may be in a minority now but I know that if we remain civilized, in the future, more will agree with me.

First you don't like the national flag thing ... I'm no flag waver myself ... but why divide athletes by continent either ... just make them all citizens of the world ... or not ... There is a spot for athletes with no country too.

Second, I hate wasteful competition designed merely to determine a winner. And the Olympics are exactly that - they are designed to decide who gets the Gold medal. They do nothing else. After a sports match, there are many tired sports people The sole purpose of the exercise was to determine a winner. (Please don't claim that there is artistry to sports - there is none. Without the competition to win the Gold Medal, an Olympic sport would lose ts interest.) Wars are like the wasteful competition of the Olympics. In a war, two countries or two regions fight one another merely to decide who is the winner. At the end, everyone is in fact a loser.

Ya well at the end of the Olympics everyone is in fact a winner for having been there at all.

It's about excellence, striving to do your very best.

Ultimately it's about the individuals, about heroes and role models for youth.
Who will ever forget Jose Chouinard skating her heart out after her Mother died, or Katerina Dewitt crying for Sarajevo, or the Jamaican bobsled team ... ok those are all winter examples but let's see what heroes emerge from the Olympics this time because where heroes are from doesn't really matter ... maybe they're from nowhere like runner Guor Marial: "No country, no problem"

And the opening/closing spectacles are awesome!

Lighten up. It's just sports. Kid's games for adults. It's fun. :)

And stupid politicians are just comic relief ... like "Mitt the Twit" :lol:

Edited by jacee, 27 July 2012 - 11:53 PM.

Yeh Towhey! Somebody give that man a job.

#13 msj

msj

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,258 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver Island

Posted 28 July 2012 - 07:03 AM

Is it not ironic that Greece is the first counrry to enter the arena?


Maybe if one doesn't know what irony is and is ignorant about the history of the Olympic Games.

Edited by msj, 28 July 2012 - 07:04 AM.

(God)2 = -1 Solve for God....
-----------------------------------------------------
x2 + (y - 3√x2)2 = 1
-----------------------------------------------------

#14 Shady

Shady

    Truth Detector

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,298 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, Ontario
  • Interests:Sports, politics, gaming, working out.

Posted 28 July 2012 - 07:26 AM

What does the NHS have to do with the Olympics?

Good point. Especially since the NHS has become such a disaster. Although perhaps that's the connection with the games.

Anyways, I generally support some tax funding for our Olympic atheltes. But perhaps there should be a box to check off when one does their taxes indicating whether or not they want any of their taxes to go to supporting those types of programs.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win" - Gandhi

Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010

#15 BubberMiley

BubberMiley

    The Left Personified

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,211 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:ƃǝdıuuıʍ ‘sʇɥƃıǝɥ ɹǝΛıɹ

Posted 28 July 2012 - 07:52 AM

But perhaps there should be a box to check off when one does their taxes indicating whether or not they want any of their taxes to go to supporting those types of programs.

Excellent idea! There should be boxes for everything! Roads, bridges, military, health care, Peter Mackay's lunch dates...
Or, alternately, we could be grown-ups and realize that "our tax dollars" aren't "our dollars" anymore, and we have elected people to spend them.

Edited by BubberMiley, 28 July 2012 - 07:52 AM.

Si vous pouvez lire ceci, vous êtes un libéral.