12 replies to this topic

[Peeves]

in some Islam countries she'd be dead by mow.

Like the 'adulterer' (The female adulterer of course.

What's interesting is her connection to Hamas. It will be interesting to see how it plays out and what the sentance is. Oh and of course the bleeding hearts in CUPE -Sid Ryan etc. that will likely defend her after all, she was helping 'palestinians' to freedom.

All I can say is good. It sends a message to Iran too.

http://news.national...smuggling-plot/

Edited by Peeves, 13 July 2012 - 01:34 PM.

[g_bambino]

in some Islam countries she'd be dead by mow.

The dreaded death by mow sentence.


[ed.: c/e, +]

Edited by g_bambino, 13 July 2012 - 02:17 PM.

[Michael Hardner]

I'm not sure why you felt a need to throw blame at Sid Ryan for this one, but posts like this are about being emotional and figuratively punching your pillow, so there there let it all out.

IN other news, someone was charged with a crime and the system continues to work. 12 years since 9/11 coming up, and we're all moving on - there's no world wide conspiracy of Muslims, or New World Order types who want to read our emails.

[na85]

I won't speak to the Muslim conspiracy, but rest assured there are indeed people within the Government and that of the United States that very much do want to read your emails.

Edited by na85, 13 July 2012 - 04:29 PM.

[bush_cheney2004]

I won't speak to the Muslim conspiracy, but rest assured there are indeed people within the Government and that of the United States that very much do want to read your emails.

Not just want to....read emails whenever they want to.

[Peeves]

I'm not sure why you felt a need to throw blame at Sid Ryan for this one, but posts like this are about being emotional and figuratively punching your pillow, so there there let it all out.

IN other news, someone was charged with a crime and the system continues to work. 12 years since 9/11 coming up, and we're all moving on - there's no world wide conspiracy of Muslims, or New World Order types who want to read our emails.

I seldom need a reason to show my disdain for Sid, if I'm for anything he's against it. So I take my shots whenever I can. So far however there's no evidence that he has an opinion...yet.

BTW it was not Hamas she supported but Hezbollah -...you know that Iranian, Syrian supported illegal military faction in Lebanon ordered several years ago (UN),that they must disband.

Still, the Lebanese in Quebec have flown th Hezbollah flag on occasions. My concern is that it seems very well known according to th media, that there are fund raising and criminal activities conductedin Canada expressly for Hezbollah arms. Hezbollah probably has more military power now in and out of Lebanon than does the Canadian military..( I speculate.)

Edited by Peeves, 14 July 2012 - 08:08 AM.

[Shakeyhands]

The dreaded death by mow sentence.


[ed.: c/e, +]

OMG that was funny..... Thanks G.

[Peeves]

Not just want to....read emails whenever they want to.

And yet, who has more freedom?

[Peeves]

The dreaded death by mow sentence.


[ed.: c/e, +]

That is far and away the bestest typo response I have ever encountered. Cutting indeedy do.

[bleeding heart]

And yet, who has more freedom?

Those with the power to read whatever correspondence they wish, of course.

[Michael Hardner]

So I take my shots whenever I can.

Why can you in this case ? He has nothing to do with it "yet".

[Peeves]

Why can you in this case ? He has nothing to do with it "yet".

Like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, Sid tends to create photo ops. I get tired of his popping up for every cause that will get him publicity. That's my only defense.

On the other hand one must be careful of getting on the wrong side with Ryan....

He's still a citizen of Canada and entitled to speak his mind. Lawyer James Morton

Ryan v. Clarke: A Timeline
- 2006: Alan Clarke distributes flyers at the GM plant in Oshawa, criticizing CAW Local 222 for its endorsement of federal NDP candidate Sid Ryan, a move he says is in breach of union rules. The flyer includes a picture of Mr. Ryan with an official from Sinn Fein, the political arm of the Irish Republican Army, and suggests Mr. Ryan fraternized with terrorists. Mr. Ryan sues Mr. Clarke for $1 million, claiming he's been defamed.

- 2008: Mr. Clarke is cleared of charges laid under the Canada Elections Act by an Oshawa judge, who finds the pamphleteering was not an attempt to influence the outcome of the election, which Mr. Ryan lost.

- 2010: A settlement in the defamation suit appears to be reached when a Superior Court judge signs off on it. But Mr. Clarke immediately rejects the settlement, saying he didn't agree to terms that include issuing a retraction and making a public apology to Mr. Ryan.

- 2011: Lawyers for Mr. Ryan file a motion of contempt of court, citing Mr. Clarke's refusal to acknowledge the settlement.

- June 26, 2012: A Superior Court judge finds Mr. Clarke in contempt of court and fines him $10,000.

[cybercoma]

On the other hand one must be careful of getting on the wrong side with Ryan....

Why must one be careful about getting on the wrong side with Ryan? Because someone defamed him, refused to acknowledge it, and was subsequently fined by the court for contempt? Did you even read the timeline you posted?