Jump to content


Photo

It's stuff like this that ruins the reputation of civil servants.


37 replies to this topic

#1 Boges

Boges

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,355 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 07:28 AM

This is absolutely despicable!

http://www.thestar.c...eaked_memo.html

The internal memo, obtained by the Star, indicated that a certain number of cases had to be ongoing to guarantee a level of funding from the province.
One of the strategies was asking child protection workers not to close any ongoing cases during the month even though, as an anonymous whistleblower alleged, the move could be detrimental to families.

These are desperate people doing desperate things, she said. Youre not looking for the childs interest to get them out of the system if your funding formula is only based on the volume of children you have in the system.
The Peel CAS currently operates with a $2.3-million deficit. Province-wide, childrens aid societies face a $40-million deficit this year, and are carrying a historic debt of $33 million, according to the Ontario Association of Childrens Aid Societies.
Currently, the agencies are funded solely on the number of cases they handle. That model is set to change this year with funding based not only on caseload but also on socioeconomic factors within each societys catchment area.
The internal memo, signed by seven senior service managers, instructs staff to complete as many investigations as possible (no fewer than 1,000), transfer as many cases as possible to ongoing services, and not close any ongoing cases before the end of the fiscal year, March 31. The memo indicated that these strategies were necessary to reduce the societys current deficit and secure future funding from the province.
Our volumes continue to be lower than our projections and this will result in less funding, the memo stated.

So it's good news that child neglect cases are down but it's not good for the civil servants that want the money. So they are risking breaking up families in order to maintain funding.

The memo also suggests there's a quota system! What immoral people.

Edited by Boges, 15 March 2013 - 07:43 AM.


#2 punked

punked

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,987 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 10:00 AM

This is absolutely despicable!http://www.thestar.c...eaked_memo.htmlSo it's good news that child neglect cases are down but it's not good for the civil servants that want the money. So they are risking breaking up families in order to maintain funding.
The memo also suggests there's a quota system! What immoral people.


This and the whole March spending madness is what the NDP in NS ended. They also might be the only province this year to have a balanced budget. Your move pretend conservatives on this board.

#3 MiddleClassCentrist

MiddleClassCentrist

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,424 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario
  • Interests:Robotics, Gaming (RTS, TBS, RPG), Wood Working, Camping, Cycling

Posted 15 March 2013 - 12:34 PM

This is absolutely despicable!

http://www.thestar.c...eaked_memo.html

So it's good news that child neglect cases are down but it's not good for the civil servants that want the money. So they are risking breaking up families in order to maintain funding.

The memo also suggests there's a quota system! What immoral people.

You speak as though this corruption is unique to the public sector.

 

I'm not trying to downplay this act however;

 

Let us not forget the countless examples of private sector rigging the system to ensure profit and continued operation.

 

For instance, the example given by Michael Moore where they did not send kids home from a youth detention centre to keep making money off of holding them...  The PRIVATIZED centre... keeping teens ready to go back, to make another buck.

 

Don't even get me started about the bank bailouts... wink.png


Edited by MiddleClassCentrist, 15 March 2013 - 12:36 PM.

Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.


#4 Boges

Boges

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,355 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 12:36 PM

Well if they were taking public money they aren't really privatized. And that was equally as wrong. You could say the same thing about Defense contractors in the US.

This branch of CAS didn't care about families it might have ruined, it just needed it's fix of public funds.

#5 Canuckistani

Canuckistani

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,873 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 12:48 PM

This is what's wrong with contracting out this sort of thing.  These societies need to maintain funding, so they try ways to bring in more money. Why isn't child protection provided by the government?  The govt is just trying to get the service on the cheap, with the usual catastrophies.

 

And to be clear, these were not civil servants.  But don't let your ideological blinders get in the way.



#6 Boges

Boges

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,355 posts

Posted 15 March 2013 - 01:38 PM

So your contention is that contracting out costs more because the company is greedy and does stuff like this?

Again if you're getting money from the government you're ultimately public sector. These people are defacto civil servants even if the Province of Ontario isn't on their cheques.

A true contracting out situation would be like garbage removal where said government would accept bids for the service and that would be the amount of money given to the private sector.

What's happening here would be akin to what doctors do. They try to make people come in as many times as possible so they can keep billing the government.

Having a quota system for Family Services is immoral and whoever came up with that idea is a pretty immoral person.

#7 Argus

Argus

    Has more eyes than you

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,944 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yes
  • Interests:Peace, Order and Good Government

Posted 15 March 2013 - 02:02 PM

So it's good news that child neglect cases are down but it's not good for the civil servants that want the money. So they are risking breaking up families in order to maintain funding.

The memo also suggests there's a quota system! What immoral people.

You do realize that the only way the Star got that memo is an angry civil servant leaked it to them, right? Don't use the actions of big shots up top to attack all civil servants.


“Public opinion, I am sorry to say, will bear a great deal of nonsense. There is scarcely any absurdity so gross, whether in religion, politics, science or manners, which it will not bear.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

#8 The_Squid

The_Squid

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,621 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver Island

Posted 15 March 2013 - 08:43 PM

These people are defacto civil servants even if the Province of Ontario isn't on their cheques.


Saying it does not make it so.... They are not public servants. They work for a private company.

#9 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,286 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 15 March 2013 - 10:02 PM

Let us not forget the countless examples of private sector rigging the system to ensure profit and continued operation.

In the private sector, I am free to choose.  In the public sector, I am not allowed to choose.

 

"... rigging the system... "?  You mean an individual abused the power of the State for personal benefit... (I'm amazed.  What's new?)

 

----

 

When the State uses its power, it means no choice.  The State must be restricted.


Edited by August1991, 15 March 2013 - 10:03 PM.

"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#10 punked

punked

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,987 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 08:36 AM

In the private sector, I am free to choose.  In the public sector, I am not allowed to choose.

 

"... rigging the system... "?  You mean an individual abused the power of the State for personal benefit... (I'm amazed.  What's new?)

 

----

 

When the State uses its power, it means no choice.  The State must be restricted.

Yep just look at cell phones you are free to chose any of the most expensive cell phone contracts in the whole world from 4 companies that "compete" to make sure prices stay just where they are. Am I right? How about deregulated power? Ontario and Alberta, you are free to chose from any power company yet prices rose by  some 40% compared to the rest of Canada who aren't free to chose. Love me some freedom.



#11 Boges

Boges

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,355 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:07 AM

Yep just look at cell phones you are free to chose any of the most expensive cell phone contracts in the whole world from 4 companies that "compete" to make sure prices stay just where they are. Am I right? How about deregulated power? Ontario and Alberta, you are free to chose from any power company yet prices rose by  some 40% compared to the rest of Canada who aren't free to chose. Love me some freedom.

I'll agree with you about cell phones, however, the Feds did allow new low cost carriers like Wind to compete. The problem is they have to piggyback the signal the big two paid billions to create.

I put the blame of increased Hydro rates in Ontario on the shoulders of the provincial government. The green energy initiative has made hydro exponentially more expensive. You also have a government that plays musical chairs with power plants to win votes at a cost of hundreds of millions. You can't blame the private sector for that.

Edited by Boges, 16 March 2013 - 09:09 AM.


#12 punked

punked

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,987 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:12 AM

I'll agree with you about cell phones, however, the Feds did allow new low cost carriers like Wind to compete. The problem is they have to piggyback the signal the big two paid billions to create.

I put the blame of increased Hydro rates in Ontario on the shoulders of the provincial government. The green energy initiative has made hydro exponentially more expensive. You also have a government that plays musical chairs with power plants to win votes at a cost of hundreds of millions. You can't blame the private sector for that.

You deregulate a power market and prices go up even with all the Freedom of choice you can have. Look anywhere, where it is done. Some industries have no business being private. Especially the ones the public need and that have a high cost to get into. Starting up a cell phone, Internet, or power company costs million and millions of dollars so few get in and when they are in they can price fix to make huge profits. A mixed system is what we need seriously. The governments should be involved in some industry look at auto insurance rates in Canada. There are countless examples. 


Edited by punked, 16 March 2013 - 09:13 AM.


#13 Boges

Boges

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,355 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:34 AM

You deregulate a power market and prices go up even with all the Freedom of choice you can have. Look anywhere, where it is done. Some industries have no business being private. Especially the ones the public need and that have a high cost to get into. Starting up a cell phone, Internet, or power company costs million and millions of dollars so few get in and when they are in they can price fix to make huge profits. A mixed system is what we need seriously. The governments should be involved in some industry look at auto insurance rates in Canada. There are countless examples. 


I remember one poster from BC on this site telling me what he/she paid for auto insurance, where the system is only public and it's a lot more than what you can get in Ontario. You just have to be willing to shop around a bit.

BTW regarding power, my bill comes from one company. The only real choice I have is to go with a private provider that fixes your rate for 5 years in a contract. That's a bit of a gamble. I don't really see much of a choice in how I receive power.

Going back to cell phones, cable and Internet. If you're a smart consumer, there are many ways to play companies against each other to get a pretty good deal.

#14 punked

punked

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,987 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:15 AM

I remember one poster from BC on this site telling me what he/she paid for auto insurance, where the system is only public and it's a lot more than what you can get in Ontario. You just have to be willing to shop around a bit.

BTW regarding power, my bill comes from one company. The only real choice I have is to go with a private provider that fixes your rate for 5 years in a contract. That's a bit of a gamble. I don't really see much of a choice in how I receive power.

Going back to cell phones, cable and Internet. If you're a smart consumer, there are many ways to play companies against each other to get a pretty good deal.

In BC the government pulled a Billion dollars out of the insurance company 2 years ago so yah thats those free market Liberals for you they can't even let a good thing work on its own. They kinda had I guess to cover their HST debts when it was repealed however their is more to that story then meets the eye. In the end in Canada on average a public insurance is cheaper that is a fact.  

 

Considering Ontario deregulated the power industry so anyone could "freely compete" 10 years ago you can see why I say a mixed system in some industries is needed. 

 

Canadian cell phone operates charge some of the highest rates in the world, Canadian Internet is some of the slowest and our cable operators are also our Internet operators so they cap how much you can use so that you can't get rid of your television for direct streaming. That does not sound like the free market to me. Some industries need the government to be involved. You might say you like it the way it is but even now the government is involved if nothing else then to prevent these large companies from bleeding us dry. I mean look even Tony Clement told the CRTC they had to let other Internet companies on bells lines because if he didn't Canadian Internet would never get more competitive. 



#15 shortlived

shortlived

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 660 posts

Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:20 AM

;These things should just be done through the courts anyway. Why the hell have a pbulically funded private organization? This is part of the social system but imo the courts should manage these things. It is historical though, but yes it is problematic of requiring quotas on child abuse. They shouldn't be funding the private sector anyway though. 

 

The government could just make boarding schools or something.  Direct funding is the key, cut all the crap.

 

If Bronte can do it for less the government can too..

The costs of court and funding staff, and still paying for things like education  adds up to more than sending the kids off to private school.

http://www.brontecollege.ca/

 

The other $1300 that is above the cost of the $9700 average for students seems to be likely enough to offset the cost of staff, administration and future costs perhaps related to delinquency that the childrens aid system creates with foster and broken homes with an absence of structure and strong peer support groups in that a boarding environment would provide.


Edited by shortlived, 16 March 2013 - 10:33 AM.

My posts are sometimes edited to create spelling errors if you see one kindly notify me. These edits do not show up as edits as my own edits do, so it is either site moderation, or third party moderation. This includes changing words completely. If a word looks out of place in a message kindly contact me so I can correct it. These changes are not exclusive to this website, and is either a form of net stalking by a malicious hacker, or perhaps government, it has been ongoing for years now.




Reply to this topic