Jump to content


Photo

Meaningless, Uninformative Thread Titles


21 replies to this topic

#1 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,666 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 06 May 2006 - 02:58 PM

We currently have three thread titles that indicate nothing about the thread's discussion.

This is not helpful to posters and does not reflect well on the forum. It's an invitation to directionless rants.

Greg, I suggest that when you find such a thread title, you simply delete the thread. If you do this once or twice, the problem will stop.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#2 Greg

Greg

    Forum Admin

  • Forum Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lethbridge
  • Interests:Internet, politics, weblogging, and technology.

Posted 09 May 2006 - 12:12 PM

Agreed. This is indeed a large problem and it will hopefully solved when I have the assistance of a few Forum Facilitators.

Please stay tuned to the News and Announcement section for more information.

Thanks!
Have any issues, problems using the forum? Contact me directly, or post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.

#3 Charles Anthony

Charles Anthony

    Hammer On A Drum

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,905 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:across Dundonald Park
  • Interests:paying taxes

Posted 05 June 2006 - 06:51 PM

We currently have three thread titles that indicate nothing about the thread's discussion.
This is not helpful to posters and does not reflect well on the forum. It's an invitation to directionless rants.
Greg, I suggest that when you find such a thread title, you simply delete the thread. If you do this once or twice, the problem will stop.


I am not too sure what you mean.... Can you explain?

Agreed. This is indeed a large problem and it will hopefully solved when I have the assistance of a few Forum Facilitators.
Please stay tuned to the News and Announcement section for more information.
Thanks!


I still do not understand... Can you give me an example?




Seriously, I HATE IT WHEN PEOPLE JUST QUOTE THE WHOLE PREVIOUS MESSAGE IN THEIR REPLIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING????!?!!!!!????!!!!????

People stop! Enough already!

<< Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>


#4 Naci Sey

Naci Sey

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 55 posts
  • Location:Cowichan Valley

Posted 02 July 2007 - 11:09 AM

Agreed. This is indeed a large problem and it will hopefully solved when I have the assistance of a few Forum Facilitators.

Please stay tuned to the News and Announcement section for more information.

Greg or Charles, is there a way for the original poster of a thread to change the thread title? I supposed in another thread that there was - some other discussion forums make such changes possible -, but as far as I can see, from having begun a topic myself, there isn't. If there isn't, are there plans to enable this feature in the future?

#5 Charles Anthony

Charles Anthony

    Hammer On A Drum

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,905 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:across Dundonald Park
  • Interests:paying taxes

Posted 02 July 2007 - 12:18 PM

Greg or Charles, is there a way for the original poster of a thread to change the thread title?

For the time being, use the Report function to indicate what the correction should be. If you are the creator of the thread, the correction will be made as soon as we check the messages.
The new Forum Facilitators will likely have the privilege of receiving those Reports as well. Thus, such errors could be corrected with minimal delay.

I supposed in another thread that there was - some other discussion forums make such changes possible -, but as far as I can see, from having begun a topic myself, there isn't. If there isn't, are there plans to enable this feature in the future?

I do not know.


---


If my lame attempt at injecting irony and sarcastic humor in post #3 up above has gone over like a lead zeppelin, please, just ignore it. .


---


Back specifically to the query of the Opening Post, Greg's reply does not explicitly identify whether he agrees to the suggested remedy or not.
I will be sure to clarify this issue with him.

<< Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>


#6 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,666 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 02 July 2007 - 02:38 PM

I am not too sure what you mean.... Can you explain?


Here's a recent example: Startling News

Here's another one: I was disgusted...
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#7 ScottSA

ScottSA

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,790 posts

Posted 02 July 2007 - 03:40 PM

I am not too sure what you mean.... Can you explain?


Here's a recent example: Startling News

Here's another one: I was disgusted...

Yes, it should be a banning offense. Maybe even a drawing and quartering offence. After all, if someone still has dialup, it may take a whole 5 seconds to find out what the topic is about. We're all busy people and time is money, and money is the root of...well never mind... Btw, how long did it take to make the complaining post?

#8 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,666 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 02 July 2007 - 10:03 PM

Yes, it should be a banning offense.

I didn't suggest banning. I argued in favour of deleting the thread.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#9 ScottSA

ScottSA

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,790 posts

Posted 02 July 2007 - 10:31 PM

Yes, it should be a banning offense.

I didn't suggest banning. I argued in favour of deleting the thread.

If we delete this thread instead, can we pass one of the others? Why would you want to delete threads just because it takes an extra second of tittilating curiosity to see what it's about?

#10 Charles Anthony

Charles Anthony

    Hammer On A Drum

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,905 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:across Dundonald Park
  • Interests:paying taxes

Posted 03 July 2007 - 02:39 AM

If we delete this thread instead, can we pass one of the others?

Personally, I would not want to make any changes to the those two recent examples identified in post #6 up above for one reason only: to illustrate what NOT to do. If you can call that "pass one of the others" so be it.

The irony is that this thread was opened over a year ago and we now have (at least) two RECENT examples of threads with non-descriptive titles degenerating rapidly into directionless rants.

<< Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>


#11 Shakeyhands

Shakeyhands

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,314 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Center of the Multiverse.

Posted 03 July 2007 - 04:24 AM

HEY!!!! I thought the title of my thread was a bit of a teaser in order to generate some interest. I forgot that some of you are busy sitting in pubs with wifi, pontificating. It takes two seconds to see what a thread is about by looking in it, or you could just pass it by if the title does not spell the topic out for you. What a bunch of whiners.
"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

#12 ScottSA

ScottSA

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,790 posts

Posted 03 July 2007 - 08:34 AM

If we delete this thread instead, can we pass one of the others?

Personally, I would not want to make any changes to the those two recent examples identified in post #6 up above for one reason only: to illustrate what NOT to do. If you can call that "pass one of the others" so be it.

The irony is that this thread was opened over a year ago and we now have (at least) two RECENT examples of threads with non-descriptive titles degenerating rapidly into directionless rants.

Yes, no doubt due entirely to the non-descriptive titles. No other threads degenerate in quite the same way.

#13 M.Dancer

M.Dancer

    Mocker

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,000 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Right in front of you
  • Interests:every single word Kimmy has ever posted

Posted 03 July 2007 - 10:32 AM

Could someone do something about thetitle of this thread......perhaps change it to:

Things that annoy Anal Retentives or such......then I could have avoided it all together...
RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS
If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

#14 August1991

August1991

    Voltaire's Bastard

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,666 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montréal

Posted 03 July 2007 - 10:05 PM

Yes, no doubt due entirely to the non-descriptive titles. No other threads degenerate in quite the same way.

Scott, give it a break.

First, at thsi very moment, I want to dispute one of your claims and I don't know where to find your post. (It's a religious thread about Islam. Your ridiculous thread titles make it difficult to find. I'm still looking.)

Second, imagine curious lurkers faced with a panoply of threads (or Google searchers incorrectly directed). How would they know where to click?

Could someone do something about thetitle of this thread......perhaps change it to:

Things that annoy Anal Retentives or such......then I could have avoided it all together...

Between completely random diarrhea and anal retentive precision, surely we can have a compromise.

When you open the hood of a Mercedes, you usually don't find a Hyundai motor.
"In civilised society he stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes, while his whole life is scarce sufficient to gain the friendship of a few persons." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2

#15 ScottSA

ScottSA

    Full Member

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,790 posts

Posted 03 July 2007 - 10:55 PM

Yes, no doubt due entirely to the non-descriptive titles. No other threads degenerate in quite the same way.

Scott, give it a break.

First, at thsi very moment, I want to dispute one of your claims and I don't know where to find your post. (It's a religious thread about Islam. Your ridiculous thread titles make it difficult to find. I'm still looking.)

Second, imagine curious lurkers faced with a panoply of threads (or Google searchers incorrectly directed). How would they know where to click?

Could someone do something about thetitle of this thread......perhaps change it to:

Things that annoy Anal Retentives or such......then I could have avoided it all together...

Between completely random diarrhea and anal retentive precision, surely we can have a compromise.

When you open the hood of a Mercedes, you usually don't find a Hyundai motor.

You shouldn't get in the habit of disputing my claims. It's easier to don a hair shirt and flagellate yourself on a rockstrewn pilgrimage to the Holy Land, since it involves a great deal less humiliation for you :) On the basis of that fact, my mystical hard to find ninja threads are actually a boon to you! Perhaps you can't find my thread because Charles ran away with it and hid it behind another thread?



Reply to this topic