whoknows888

He could debate for a hour, but your idol Kerry would love to blast Bush for not being in the office.

Yes propaganda. Kerry wants to do this and then blast Bush for not "doing his duty".

Hmmm a few words.......... Democrat propaganda. Also if Kerry and Bush were to debate wouldn't Kerry bash Bush for "not protecting his oval office". You liberals crack me up with your nonsense.

Just released today from Homeland Security is that Americans all over the world be prepared for possible attacks on transportation vehicles etc. Isn't that good enough for you or should we say, "Hey terrorists this is to you, we know that you want to bomb the hell out of us, and you are in NY so change your plans and go to Detroit where we aren't." Saddam hasn't cooperated with the treaty he signed after the Gulf War. We could have bombed him during the Clinton administration but the "tree humping wussy hippies" don't see it that way. A brief part of history, the U.S. made the U.N. that is why the U.N. headquarters are in the U.S. Is it better fighting terrorists on foreign soil than domestic soil? You fail to realize all possibiltes of what can happen with terrorism, but lets not vote to go to war against terrorists we just want to appease them.

Ah yes the economy. Clinton was lucky to be in office when he was because that was during the "most prosperous period in history". If you look at it this way Bushmustgo the first quarter and last quarter of the Clinton administration the economy started to plummet. The recession list by President Bush's economy people say it started in March 2000, but that was when the economy was plummeting. These tax cuts for the wealthy have helped made jobs for us and we can't forget what our friendly democrats did by signing the NAFTA. The democrats royaly screwed us over by letting corporations go over seas. The tax cuts help the entrepenuers and if they get taxed like Kerry plan says, then we mine as well throw another 2.3 million jobs down the hole. These tax cuts are helping small corporations get help. Also many of us Americans are losing jobs because they are low paying jobs and are the type of jobs we don't want to have thus giving jobs to immigrants. Also if you want to look at it this way, the democrats are wanting to spend $200 billion more on the healthcare, and then blame the Republicans for their plan. It was quite the same plan too. Also I bet you liberals are for the social implements in our schools because it is "degrading to our children". In NY (state) there is a city whose superintendent agrees to the social status to the kids and this is why you may think that 'No Child Left Behind' is a failure. As for the war in Iraq it isn't a disaester like you liberals want it to be covered. We have given Iraqis freedom of press, freedom of oppresion, opened up 2,300 schoos, given them medical care etc. yet you refer to bombings as your defenses. Also there has been links with Saddam and Al-Qaeda because how the blue hell would a terrorist organization be able to run without a nation-state to help? Saddam has clearly given money to UBL. Also the war in Iraq can be justified as this, would you rather fight terrorists here on our homeland or overseas in centreal ME where we can help stop terrorists easier. Btw, Clinton bombed places that were unmanned thus wasting missles etc. FYI lets do what the Democrats say and invite the terrorists in and suck their tankards while we are at it, because that is what their mindset is. Also if we cut on the defense like you Black Dog and Kerry propose why don't we do what the demys say and get rid of America. Hell lets just let China, N. Korea, Iran, etc. take over us. As for Mr. O'Reilly he probably has more intellectual knowledge between the Democrats who can't see what is right or wrong.