Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Feature:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» History of the Debate
» Perceptions of Pot Use
» Support for Decriminalization
» Reaction to Legislation
» Social Change
» Links to Further Info
 

Social Change in Canada
Drug laws and the evolution of Canadian society

It is difficult to say exactly what impact US opposition will have on the Liberal government’s proposed legislation. The Canadian government is loath to risk the lucrative trading relationship between the two countries.

At the same time, the debate in Canada has moved beyond whether smoking pot is good or bad. In many provinces decriminalization will allow law enforcement and the courts to focus on breaking organized crime syndicates that control most of the production and distribution of illicit drugs. By contrast, to many, the “war on drugs” that has been the focus of much publicity in the US over the years, includes a misguided and ineffective attack on the relatively benign social and health effects of smoking marijuana .

The fact is that Bill C-17 is a long way from legalizing marijuana. The expressed intent of the legislation is to avoid saddling millions of Canadians with a criminal record, while continuing to discourage the production and use of marijuana. Doubling penalties for cultivating pot indicates that the federal government intends to seriously tackle the expansion of grow operations across the country. In this way, the move to decriminalize marijuana may not represent as radical a liberalization of Canadian society as many might think.

Socially conservative opponents, however, view efforts to decriminalize marijuana in much the same light as the do recent moves to legalize same-sex marriage. Such critics characterize both issues as an assault on traditional values, arguing that liberal drug polices open the door to a wider drug culture. They fear that Canadian cities such as Vancouver – with an already significant drug abuse problem – will become havens for drug tourism, resembling an Amsterdam on the Pacific.

The Liberal government’s proposed legislation has yet to move completely through Parliament and will face a number of obstacles. Under a minority government, the Liberals will require support from opposition members in Parliament. This may be difficult; in the previous Parliament, the proposed marijuana bill was one of the most hotly contested pieces of legislation.

In this regard, NDP House Leader, Libby Davies, says her party plans to make changes to the legislation. She says the new bill still allows for too much enforcement for simple possession. In addition, she stated the NDP is interested in proposing the bill include "some provision for amnesty for the approximately 600,000 Canadians who have a criminal record for simple possession of marijuana."

If Bill C-17 passes through Parliament, it will be a momentous event in a history of debate over drug use in Canada. How much it might impact the evolution of Canadian society, however, remains to be seen.

Next >>
Links to More Information


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007