Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Features:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Spending Summary
» Budget Politics
» Restraint vs Spending
» Impact on Canadians
» Northern Tiger
» Points of View
» In Perspective
» Links to Further Info
 
More Information
« Federal Budget 2001
 
External Info & Links
« Department of Finance
« John Manley Web Site
« Federal Gov't Web Site
 

Budget Politics
The political implications of Manley’s budget

This is Finance Minister Manley’s first budget and the final budget under Prime Minister Chrétien.

Chrétien’s Legacy

For Chrétien, this budget will play a large part in his so-called legacy agenda. Dramatic new investments in social, environmental, and welfare programs are designed to cover over a decade of program cuts. A global wave of fiscal restraint during the 1990s and the subsequent recoil of government spending have dominated Chrétien’s leadership term. This betrays his political heritage formed under the tutelage of Prime Ministers like Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau. Chrétien is anxious to ensure that his historical reputation will be synonymous with social investment, compassion, and forward thinking; he wants to put liberalism back into the Liberal agenda. Since the 2003 budget spends well into the next leader’s tenure, Chrétien’s influence will remain long after he is gone.

Leadership Race

For Finance Minister Manley, the 2003 budget will be the showpiece for his upcoming Liberal Party leadership campaign. A strong economy has left room for him to satisfy a number of popular wish lists. Widely spread spending should result in popularity from all sorts of interests. So far the reaction has been tempered, however, since no single issue, beyond health care, is singled out. In fact, many interest groups see this budget as merely papering over the damage done by previous budgets. Military lobbyists, for instance, are nonplussed by the increases since they will simply allow the Canadian Forces to scrape by.

Other critics declare that Manley is ‘betraying’ his reputation for promoting free enterprise, fiscal discipline, and self-reliance principals. But Manley can counter such critics, who call this a ‘tax-and-spend’ budget. Despite the new commitments, expenditures will rise less than the GDP; Canada’s economy is continuing to grow at a steady click. Moreover, beyond the generous spending increases for social programs, he can point out to critics that it is a balanced budget with substantial surpluses in the forecast, and an ample contingency allowance.

Influencing Paul Martin

Both Chrétien and Manley have an overriding aim to restrain Paul Martin agenda, likely the next leader of the Liberal Party and Canada. Unless something changes significantly (and this is not out of the question), Paul Martin will be the next Prime Minister. Martin will be in power when most of the bills come in for this year’s budget. While he has not criticized Manley’s budget, it clearly broke with his tradition of modest spending.

Summarizing Joe Clark’s objections to the budget, the CBC reported, “Chrétien and Manley will get the credit for the billions for health care, the environment and children, but Martin could be in charge when it comes to pay the bills.”

Next >>
Fiscal Restraint Versus Health and Social Spending
 


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007