Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Feature:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Overview of the Industry
» Regulation of Lumber
» Politics of Softwood
» Chronology of Events
» Impact of the Dispute
» CDN Dispute Strategy
» Reading and Links  
 

Impact of the Softwood Lumber Dispute
From lost jobs to strained bilateral relations

The negative impact of the softwood lumber dispute has been felt, both in Canada and the United States:

Increased Unemployment levels. In Canada, the softwood lumber dispute has cost thousands of jobs. The impact has been felt most strongly in British Columbia, which is responsible for over 50 percent of Canada’s softwood lumber exports. Approximately 15 percent of jobs in British Columbia are either directly or indirectly related to the forestry industry. Between April 2001 (when the first set of softwood lumber duties were applied) and December 2002, over 10,000 jobs were lost in the province. The impact has been most severely felt in hundreds of rural communities which rely on logging and sawmills for employment – both directly through jobs in these areas, and indirectly through the service industries (such as schools and hospitals) that are generated in the community.

While the dispute has not yet had a major impact on employment in the United States, it is true that employment in industries that use lumber (including companies that sell lumber, and housing contractors) far outweighs employment in industries that produce lumber. Placing duties on Canadian lumber pushes up the cost of the lumber, which, in turn, can negatively impact employment. Some analysts warn that continuing to place duties on Canadian softwood lumber will ultimately lead to higher job losses than would be the case if the duties were removed.

Higher US Housing Prices – The tariffs for Canadian softwood lumber have led to, on average, a $1,000 (US) increase in the cost of a new home. While this figure may seem relatively low, given that the cost for even a modest new home in the US can easily run into six figures, it has limited the number of Americans who are eligible for a mortgage by approximately 300,000. Consequently, US consumer groups, such as the Alliance of American Consumers for Affordable Homes, have lobbied for an end to tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber exports.

Strained relations between Canada and the United States. Despite the publicity surrounding this one issue, over 95 percent of bilateral trade between Canada and the United States is problem-free. Nonetheless, the ongoing dispute surrounding softwood lumber has led to threats of a trade war by Canada, and a US lobby group launching a constitutional challenge to the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Next >>
Canadian strategy in the dispute going forward


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007