Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Feature:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Electoral Boundaries
» Boundary Readjustment
» Federalism, Elections, and Regionalism
» 2004 Federal Election
» Reflecting & Reforming
» Links to Further Info
 
More Information
« Senate Reform
« Electoral Reform
« Responsible Government
 
External Info & Links
« Constitution Act, 1867
« Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act
« Statistics Canada
« Elections Canada
« Chief Electoral Officer
« Federal Electoral Boundaries Commissions
 

Reflecting Canada, Reforming the Electoral System
Territorial vastness and population density

To some extent, Canada's riding system is designed to reflect both history and diversity. Rather than have densely populated, urban areas dominate the House of Commons, the distribution of electoral seats is designed to grant a certain amount of power to large, rural areas as well as regions (like Prince Edward Island, for example) that played an important role in the formation of Canada.

Disparities have emerged as a result of these allowances. Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta have their number of seats determined solely by population figures, while all of the other provinces benefit from the senatorial and grandfather clauses explained earlier. Some analysts have argued that if current trends continue, Saskatchewan will soon have more seats in Parliament than Nova Scotia, but have fewer people.

While this problem will likely need addressing, few politicians are eager to reopen the thorny issue of constitutional reform.

Electoral Reform in Canada

It is likely that electoral reform will become a hot topic in the coming years.

Such reform will not only take into account the need for a more equitable distribution of seats, but may overhaul the system altogether. The ‘first past the post' electoral system may be replaced with a form of proportional representation (PR). In fact, most democratic countries already function under a form of PR.

Proportional representation means that Members of Parliament (MP's) are elected from ridings in proportion to the number of votes received. This system ensures that the number of legislative seats earned by political parties reflects the percentage of public support. As such, the party (or candidate) is not required to place first in the riding to win the seat. This differs from the ‘first past the post' system – sometimes called the ‘winner takes all' system – where votes going to a losing candidate are wasted, even if that candidate receives 49.9% of the vote. When these votes are wasted, segments of the population are not represented in the House of Commons. If Canada introduces a new system, it will likely take shape as a combination of the proportional representation and ‘first past the post' systems.

In all likelihood, the process for adjusting electoral boundaries will also be examined. Reformers hope to redraw Canada's political map in order to strike a new balance between population density and territorial/historical prominence so the Canadian form of democracy continues to reflect Canada.

Next >>
Links to More Information


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007