Please Note! This particular section of Mapleleafweb is outdated and is in the process of being updated and migrated to the new version of Maple Leaf Web. Maple Leaf Web makes no guarantee that the information below is up to date and or correct.

Please update your bookmarks and thank you for your patience. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments

Site Map | Contact | Help 

Mapleleafweb.com Logo  
  in-curve
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Feature:
spacer
spacer

Jump to . . .
» Introduction
» Campaign Finance Laws
» Financing Party Politics
» Regulating Donations
» Other Jurisdictions
» Price of Democracy
» Links to Further Info
 

Financing Party Politics in Canada
Who pays for election campaigns in Canada?

In addition to addressing concerns about the level of spending by political parties, Bill C-24 and other election-spending regulations have been designed to reduce the dependence of political parties on big business and labour union contributions.

As of 2001, 95 of the top 100 donors to the Liberal Party of Canada were businesses and the biggest proportion of the Party’s income came from corporations. Roughly the same scenario held true for the Conservative Party. As a result, while donor businesses may not have directly benefited from government policy, they were perceived as having a stake in government decisions. Often, corporations expected that a large contribution to a given party would give them access to a Minister or government official, should that party form government.

For example, according to Democracy Watch, in 2001 Bombardier Inc. donated over $140,000 to the Liberal Party and subsequently received over $100 million in government contracts.

Watchdog organizations such as Democracy Watch, and legislative reforms such as Bill C-24, have increased the transparency of Canada’s electoral system and tamed both the perception and actual influence of corporations and trade unions.

According to Elections Canada, during the period from 2001 to 2003 (fiscal years), major party contributions followed this pattern.

2001

Liberal Party of Canada
Individuals ($2,384,538), Businesses ($6,411,391), Unions ($40,481)

Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance Party
Individuals ($2,940,918), Businesses ($873,989), Unions ($0)

Progressive Conservative Party of Canada
Individuals ($2,192,748), Businesses ($1,457,507), Unions ($0)

New Democratic Party
Individuals ($3,532,241), Businesses ($97,542), Unions ($1,391,652)

2002

Liberal Party of Canada
Individuals ($3,129,405), Businesses ($5,144,528), Unions ($51,214)

Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance Party
Individuals ($5,956,971), Businesses ($1,121,519), Unions ($0)

Progressive Conservative Party of Canada
Individuals ($2,264,955), Businesses ($1,038,908), Unions ($6,061)

New Democratic Party
Individuals ($4,136,889), Businesses ($95,269), Unions ($1,021,481)

2003

Liberal Party of Canada
Individuals ($6,194,925), Businesses ($10,816,396), Unions ($111,938)

Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance Party
Individuals ($5,356,912), Businesses ($1,319,144), Unions ($0)

Progressive Conservative Party of Canada
Individuals ($3,152,867), Businesses ($1,155,746), Unions ($0)

New Democratic Party
Individuals ($4,782,777), Businesses ($109,958), Unions ($5,198,717)

Will the New System Work?

Now that Bill C-24 has been instituted, public financing will be used to replace prohibited business and union donations.

But critics are pointing to potential problems with this new system. They note that public financing provisions might not be enough during periods of frequent elections (brought on by minority governments).

Next >>
Regulating Political Donations


 

© 2001-2006 Maple Leaf Web.
All Rights Reserved


This page was last modified: August 10, 2007