Alberta Elections

2008 Alberta Election: Nominations are Closed

Marco Navarro-Genie — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:28:24 -0700

Candidate nominations for the present general election in Alberta closed yesterday. The biggest news (again) is that Elections Alberta does not make it very friendly for people to use their data (A nice printable file, if not a downloadable spreadsheet file, would make the lives of people in the media a bit easier).

The New Democrats and the Progressive Conservatives are presenting candidates in all 83 ridings. The Liberals, surprisingly, are not running a candidate in Peace River. The Green Party has augmented its team to 79 for this election, up from 46 in 2004. They’ll be absent in Dunvegan-Central Peace, Peace River, Lac La Biche-St. Paul, and Whitecourt-Ste. Anne.

About their absence in Peace River the Liberals will probably say that it’s not a big deal: someone likely didn’t get the papers in on time. Social Credit (Socreds) are not running a candidate there this year and the Greens have still not found someone to run for them in the riding. It’s a three-way race between Conservatives, New Democrats and the new arrivals, the Wildrose-Alliance. That makes it now one of the seats to watch if for no other reason that there is no Liberal candidate.

The Liberal absence is likely going to boost the competitiveness of the NDP, but their vote (546) combined to that of the Liberals in 2004 (1092) is just better than half of what the Conservatives received (2884). The Alliance in its previous manifestation received 537 votes. Their best growth potential rests with the Socred votes, all 194 of them. It's unlikely that the seat will change hands.

The Wildrose-Alliance is fielding 63 candidates. Technically it’s a new party, born just a few weeks ago. In that sense, a 63-name list is somewhat impressive. They are down from the full 83 names that the Alliance presented in its previous incarnation at the last election.

The Separation Party is down from 10 to only one candidate, and the once-mighty Social Credit dropped from 43 candidates to 8. The Communist Party is still giving the public an alternative in two ridings, but their scope is expanding: both ridings used to be in Edmonton. Now, they are running one candidate in Calgary’s North East.

Two weeks to go. The party leaders’ debate takes place this week.

Rocky Election Start for Ed Stelmach

Marco Navarro-Genie — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:45:55 -0700

Ed Stelmach's first week during the campaign has been rocky, if the media coverage is any indication.

The start of the Alberta election should have been an opportunity to showcase the government's accomplishments in the last 12 months. Instead, Ed Stelmach got questions about the coinciding election date with the third anniversary of the Maythorpe killing of four RCMP officers. What was reported were speculations about insensitivity or incompetence.

The opposition also attacked the premier for his use of a room to hold a press conference in the legislature. While Stelmach addressed issues in the Throne Speech, which made the use of the space legitimate, there were intimations of impropriety given the proximity to the election call. In any case, the opposition complaints got air and ink.

An order-in-council issued on the same day of the election writ was also called into question. The order stipulated new rules of ethics for public servants and elected officials leaving their posts to become lobbyists. Stelmach was accused of deliberately setting the date for the new ethic rules to take effect after the election, suggesting an intent to allow retiring ministers enough time to get into the unrestricted lobbying game.

Then was the announcement to "graduate" more doctors. Medical schools objected to the implied notion that government can graduate more students by fiat. It suggested that government would meddle in the near-sacred independence of universities to establish their own standards. While Stelmach did not intend to annoy academicians, there were yet again hints of carelessness in the use of language without accounting for the audience to whom he speaks.

That carelessness was also apparent in premier Stelmach's announcement regarding childcare. The premier appeared to be blind sided by questions and comments coming from the mothers present at the announcement. Stelmach may have expected gratitude from them but instead got an earful on camera. The premier got to display his conciliatory nature by meeting privately with those who expressed concern. But he appeared uninformed and lacking in command of the issues for which he is supposed to be presenting solutions.

Very much the same can be said about yesterday's (Feb. 11) response to the young man who heckled the premier's announcement on the environment. Stelmach announced tax-credit incentives for purchases of environment-friendly, energy-efficient items such as heating furnaces. His good nature prompted him to address the heckler's concerns. But he ended up quoting numbers, the origin of which he could not reference. Once again he gave the impression of lacking command of crucial details.

Most of these gaffes are unlikely to cost the premier at the polls. They are not gaffes of Klein proportions in any measure, but they are distracting from the message. They will probably affect many of those watching closely: his opponents, the media, and his followers. The mishaps are likely to inspire his opponents to go harder. They will reason that their hard work might encounter a future opportunity of a more disastrous gaffe; one that will have a greater effect on the outcome.

For different reasons, the media will continue to watch him hawkishly in the expectation of greater or more meaningful mishaps that they can report in what is otherwise expected to be a boring campaign. A goof-watch of sorts may have already been declared, which might result in a quick decision by handlers to keep the premier away from cameras and microphones. The mishaps are also likely to deflate the spirit of party supporters. Going in, Stelmach was already wanting in the key electoral area of troop-inspiring. More gaffes may consolidate the scepticism about the premier, which many seem to harbour in the rank and file of the Progressive Conservatives.

None of the above should be interpreted as a prediction that Stelmach and his party are going to lose the election. All else seems to suggest the opposite. The latest public opinion poll this week gives the premier a more than comfortable 25-point lead over the Liberals and puts him in clear majority territory. The lack of what the public and pundits interpret as viable electoral options in Alberta is not being supplied. The size or quality of a Tory victory will matter more to the premier's and the province's future than a victory itself.

On to week two.

2004 Alberta General Election

Jay Makarenko — Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 -0700

On November 22, 2004, Albertans elected the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party to a majority government, returning Ralph Klein as the province’s premier. The election represented the tenth consecutive Progressive Conservative government in Alberta; the last time another party held power was in 1971, when the Social Credit Party was in government. This article provides a summary of the 2004 Alberta General Election, including information on pre-election standing and polls, key issues in the election, leaders and platforms of the major political parties, and the election’s final results.

Alberta Electoral Backgrounder

Previous elections and pre-election party standings/polls

2004 Alberta Election Issues

Key issues and debates in the election

Political Parties in 2004 Alberta Election

Policies and leaders of the parties in the election

2004 Alberta Election Results

Alberta Progressive Conservatives win a majority government

Sources and Links for More Information

Lists of article sources and links for more on this topic

2004 Alberta Election Backgrounder

Previous elections and pre-election party standings/polls

2001 General Election Results

The previous general election was held in 2001, with the Progressive Conservative Party winning a landslide victory, picking up 74 of a possible 83 seats in the Alberta legislature. The Alberta Liberals became the Official Opposition, winning seven seats; the New Democrats were elected in two ridings.

Below are the total seat counts and popular vote tallies, by party, for the 2001 Provincial General Election.

Party	Seats	Popular Vote	Status
Progressive Conservatives	74	61.91%	Majority Government
Liberals	7	27.33%	Official Opposition
New Democrats	2	08.03%	Opposition
Alberta First Party	—	00.87%	—
Social Credit Party	—	00.53%	—
Alberta Greens	—	00.28%	—
Communist Party	—	00.01%	—
Independent Candidates	—	01.04%	—

Legislature Prior to Dissolution

Prior to the dissolution of the Alberta legislature, the Progressive Conservative Party held 73 seats, with the Alberta Liberal Party holding five seats, and the Alberta New Democratic Party holding two seats. There was also one Independent MLA, and two vacant seats in the legislature.

Pre-election Public Opinion Polls

On October 30, 2004, Ipsos-Reid released a public opinion poll that put support for Ralph Klein and his Progressive Conservatives at 50 percent. The poll put support for the Alberta Liberal Party at 26 percent, the Alberta NDP at 10 percent, and the Alberta Alliance Party at nine percent.

The poll also showed a split in the province over the question of whether or not Ralph Klein should complete his term of government, should he win the 2004 campaign. Of those polled, 46 percent believed that Klein should indeed finish his term and even run for a fifth term, while 44 percent suggested they would support Klein stepping aside before the end of his potential fourth term.

2004 Alberta Election Issues

Key issues and debates in the election

Surpluses and Spending

A key issue in the 2004 election was how to spend the provincial government’s surpluses. In the summer of 2004, the PC government announced the province had successfully paid off its debt. Being in the enviable position of having its debt completely paid, and with record prices for oil fueling government revenues, the province found itself in a unique position: namely, where should revenues be spent?

In October 2004, the Alberta government released a survey, titled “It’s Your Future.” The survey polled almost 30,000 Albertans about government spending. Those surveyed indicated strongly that they favoured investing the surplus in areas of high priority, instead of putting the money away in the province’s Heritage Fund, or providing refunds for every Albertan through tax rebates.

The survey also showed that Albertans placed the highest priority on two specific areas: health care and education. Other areas of importance included the environment and tax reduction. In contrast, low priority was given to spending for cities and rural communities, and for diversifying the provincial economy; that is building an economy that is broader than the traditional industries of energy and agriculture through targeted government investment and tax incentives.

This feedback from the general public gave some indication about the specific issues that would shape the campaign, as the parties jockeyed to garner favour with potential voters.

Auto Insurance and Energy

Another issue that played a significant role in the election was government participation in key industries including auto insurance and energy. With respect to the former, the provincial government, under Ralph Klein, had recently brought in new and controversial legislation to regulate private automotive insurers and control costs for consumers. Opposition parties, however, argued in favour of a public insurance regime to control the insurance prices and prevent them from becoming exorbitant.

Since Ralph Klein’s Alberta government privatized the energy industry, consumer prices for heating homes has skyrocketed. The provincial government has attempted to address this issue by providing annual rebates to consumers. Opposition parties, however, have suggested the industry simply needs to have greater public control.

Health Care Reforms

Another issue that came into play in the election is health care reform. During the 2004 federal election, Premier Klein made several comments indicating that Alberta was prepared to take more drastic steps to make the public health care system sustainable. He later played down how drastic these reforms would be. Following the federal election, Premier Klein released two reports to the public. The first was a commissioned report completed by the Conference Board of Canada comparing the performance and cost of health care systems between Canada and five other countries.

The Alberta MLA Task Force on Healthcare Funding and Revenue Generation, chaired by Gordon Graydon, completed the second report. The Task Force concluded that increased revenues could be attained by raising health care premiums and implementing a health care deductible. With the deductible, individuals would have to pay an annual fee of 1.5 percent of their taxable income towards their healthcare costs for the year. For a person making $60,000 per year, s/he would pay an annual deductible of $900. This deductible would be in addition to each person’s health care premiums. The government would cover the costs over and above the deductible.

While Premier Klein has not explicitly stated that the government is considering these particular reforms, he stated that he would introduce some reform package if he won the 2004 provincial election. It was not clear, however, how the government would justify increased premiums and the introduction of a deductible considering the government’s own “It’s Your Future” survey indicated Albertans would prefer increased spending by the government in the area of healthcare.

Moreover, the opposition parties presented very different platforms on health care. Both the Liberals and the NDP made commitments to eliminate healthcare premiums altogether.

Alberta and Canadian Federalism

The place of Alberta in the Canadian federation was also a potential election topic. The presence of the Alberta Alliance Party raised the issue of whether or not the current federal system is in the benefit of Alberta. This issue may be particularly popular in rural Alberta. Further, Premier Klein continued to present himself as the candidate to stand up against the federal government and protect Albertans’ interests.

Political Parties in 2004 Alberta Election

Policies and leaders of the parties in the election

Leaders of the Major Political Parties

Party	Progressive Conservatives	Liberals	New Democrats
Name	Honourable Ralph Klein, MLA	Kevin Taft, MLA	Brian Mason, MLA
Education	* Enrolled in Communication Studies at Athabasca University	* BA, University of Alberta * MA, University of Alberta * PHD (Business), University of Warwick (England)	* Studied Political Science at the University of Alberta
Work experience	* Canadian Air Force * Principal, Calgary Business College * Public relations, Red Cross & United Way * Reporter, CFCN	* Researcher, Province of Alberta * Head, Taft Research and Communications (public policy analysis)	* Executive Director, Alberta Federation of Students (1977-79) * Bus driver, Edmonton Transit Services
Political experience	* Mayor of Calgary (1980-9) * MLA, Calgary-Elbow (1989-present) * Minister of Environment (1989-92) * Leader of PC Party (1992-present) * Premier of Alberta (1993-present)	* MLA, Edmonton-Riverview (2001-present) * Leader of Liberal Party (2004-present)	* City Councilor, Edmonton (1989-2000) * MLA, Edmonton-Highlands (2000-present) * Leader of NDP (2004-present)

Major Political Parties Platforms

Party	Progressive Conservatives	Liberals	New Democrats
Surplus	* Commit to spend surplus according to Albertans’ views expressed in the “It’s Your Future” survey.	* Balanced budgets every year. * Commit 35 percent of surplus to Heritage Fund. * Commit another 35 percent to a Post-Secondary Endowment Fund.	* Balanced budget every year. * Commit to re-investing in social programs, in particular health care and education.
Healthcare	* Maintain 2004 allocation of $700 million for the health care system, including $200 million for the elimination of health authorities deficits, $350 million for capital funding, and $150 million for equipment. * Hold a health symposium in 2005 to discuss ways of delivering health care more effectively. * Have indicated the introduction of reforms to increase government revenues in healthcare (possibly higher premiums or a deductible).	* Promote the five principles of the Canada Health Act. * Eliminate health care premiums for all Albertans. * Increase acute care capacity by moving ahead with a new hospital in Calgary as well as increasing the number of beds in Edmonton and rural Alberta.	* Stable funding for hospitals and health professionals. * Eliminate health care premiums. * Hire 2,000 more nurses and other health care providers. * Firm targets for waiting times. * A ban on private, for-profit clinics using public dollars. * Create a Pharmaceutical Savings Agency to bulk purchase drugs to curtail spiraling drug costs.
Education	* Maintain current increases in funding to hire new primary and secondary teachers. * Maintain a 30 percent cap on students’ contributions to the institutional cost of delivering post-secondary education.	* Strengthening the post-secondary system and increasing accessibility. * Expanding Early Childhood Development programs.	* Create parenting centres to offer resources and information to parents * Phased-in full-day Kindergarten and half-day Junior Kindergarten for children at risk. * Stable funding for schools and meaningful limits on class sizes. * 10 percent reduction in post-secondary tuition, followed by a tuition freeze and new money specifically designated for improving accessibility and learning conditions.
Taxation	* Committed to maintaining the lowest personal and corporate taxes in Canada.	* No provincial sales tax. * Reduce taxes by phasing out health care premiums.	* Reduce taxes by phasing out health care premiums and school user fees.
Auto insurance	* Maintain current private auto insurance system along with recently enacted regulations to keep costs down.	* Develop a public system for auto insurance based on the BC model, to end excessive industry profits, and reduce the medical, legal and administrative costs of providing insurance. * Restore access to the courts for accident victims, to allow them to seek fair compensation. * Reinvest a portion of auto insurance revenue in road safety programs to reduce injuries and fatalities and to keep rates as low as possible.	* Public auto insurance system, similar to systems in the Manitoba, Saskatchewan and BC. * 35 percent reduction in premiums due to non-profit status and administrative efficiency. * Removal of the “cap” on compensation to accident victims.
Energy	* Maintain current private electricity and gas system.	* Re-regulate the electricity system for all Albertans except large industrial users. * Establish a Planning Council on Electricity to help predict and prepare for future energy requirements using the lowest-cost options.	* Electricity rates based on the cost of generation plus a reasonable return for generators. * Consumers receive a full rebate for any natural gas price that is more than 20 percent above the five-year average. Currently, the rebate would automatically kick in at prices over $4.80 per gigajoule. * The program: to be financed through a portion of the royalties earned by the government from high gas prices.

(Source: Websites of the Alberta Progressive Conservatives, Alberta Liberal Party, Alberta New Democratic Party (2004))

Other Political Parties in the Election

2004 Alberta Election Results

Alberta Progressive Conservatives win a majority government

The Alberta Progressive Conservative Party won a majority government, with Ralph Klein returning as the province’s Premier. The PCs won 61 of 83 seats in the provincial legislature, with 47 percent of the popular vote (CBC, Alberta Votes). This represented a decrease of 13 seats for the PCs from the previous election in 2001, although the Party edged up slightly in the popular vote. The win represented the tenth consecutive Progressive Conservative government in Alberta, beginning in 1971.

The Liberals won 17 seats and 29 percent of the vote, returning to the legislature as the province’s Official Opposition (CBC, Alberta Votes). This represented a sharp increase from the Liberal Party’s seven seats in the 2001 general election, and a slight increase in popular support. The other major political party, the Alberta NDP, won four seats and 9.8 percent of the popular vote (CBC, Alberta Votes). In contrast, they won two seats and eight percent of the vote in 2001.

In its first provincial election, the newly formed Alberta Alliance Party won one seat and nine percent of the popular vote (CBC, Alberta Votes).

Sources and Links for More Information

Lists of article sources and links for more on this topic

Sources Used for this Article

“Alberta Votes 2004.” CBC. 23 November 2004. 05 September 2007. <http://www.cbc.ca/albertavotes2004/>