Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Sarah Sanders admits under oath to lying to the American people in order to damage the reputation of the FBI. 

  3. Slander, libel, inciting violence are not protected speech. Simply lying or saying things you don't like is not damaging, if you think it's damaging, call it out as such, if you want to censor people because of that, that's on you to come up with a good reason to do that. Free speech is a right, you don't get to restrict rights without a good reason, just because you don't agree with my argument doesn't mean it's okay to censor people if I don't come up with a reason you like not to censor people. The burden of proof is on the side of those demanding censorship of human rights, not those demanding human rights be respected, whether you find someone's use of their rights offensive or not.
  4. Mhmm ... and a kernel of truth: Bernier won't be able to unite all the bigots across the country to vote for him because bigots won't vote for a francophone.
  5. 1. I disagree and I look forward to any examples you have to prove this out. 2. Please do a spellcheck and grammar check of your posts moving forward. 3. I can rebut bad ideas, please don't try to psychoanalyze me. 4. So slander and libel CAN be censored ? Ok - seems like we have an example where you do support censorship ? Or ... ? 5. Why ? Why do we allow free speech that's damaging ? Why do we allow lying ? 6. This blanket statement is generally overquoted by people who don't think far enough ahead. You keep just posting your opinion and as such this conversation will just go nowhere. I will pick apart your posts for logic, spelling and grammar and you will just post your opinions again. No fun. Can you answer this or not: Can you come up with a single example of censorship being acceptable or having value ?
  6. 1. Still, it's far newer than socialism and barely related. 2. I don't see how. 3. This is a generalization from your POV, but fine. Do you see any good in left-of-centre viewpoint ? Why do you think they exist ? 4. Normally I understand this point of view and even respect it to a degree. But the 'new' right of the Trump pussy-grabbing party seems to love tariffs. What's more governmental than that ? Can you explain ?
  7. Whether or not you think the utility of the speech is positive or negative does not impact whether it should be censored or not, your judgement is garbage, don't trust you to draw the line properly. You air on the side of censorship not free speech, because you are afraid that you cannot rebut bad ideas. Lying is superior to censorship, because lying is protected free speech, unless slander or libel. What language you consider to be dehumanizing is irrelevant, that should not be grounds for censorship. Whether or not you find something offensive is irrelevant. Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. Free speech is not a vice, whether you find the speech of utility or not, and censoring hate speech in the name of good manners is not a virtue.
  8. 1. Im not talking about political correctness. Im talking about divisive identity politics. This helps no one. The left is obsessed with labels and categorizing people. The left rewards people based on what group they lump people into. This is wrong headed. 2. I said the exact opposite of what you're saying here. The left as a group is largely unable to look at anything objectively. Nearly everything is do or die for the left. Outrage culture perfectly describes the left. Anything slighy right makes them lose their minds. They cannot see past their own noses. If a conservative takes a position, they disagree and take the opposite side regardless of how insane it is. Instead of doing the correct thing they think they know best for society. Basically they treat adults like babies. I dont need government in my life. The left thinks it's the government's job to solve all their problems. I want much much less government. They want more. I value individual freedom. They want top down clamp down on nearly everything. If I say I dint care about that, the left says we will make you care. Often at the end of a gun. That's not freedom. Thats fascism.
  9. Today
  10. 1. Political correctness wasn't even a term in common use until the 1980s. Socialism has been around for much longer. You can't just mix everything up that you disagree with and describe it with the same words. 2. The masses have become so vain that they (you) are unable to accept criticism or even the idea that they can be criticized. It's beyond vanity - it's narcissism.
  11. 1. Can you come up with a single example of censorship being acceptable or having value ? 2. Not because I disagree, but because the utility of the speech is negative. 3. Name calling tsk. tsk. 4. Name calling, coming up with reasons why your opponent is invalid, devaluing people you don't agree with are as bad as censorship. You're basically lying about me, how is that better than censoring me ? I could characterize your speech in a way that dehumanizes you and I'm sure you would find that unfair.
  12. Will CBC and CTV cover the funeral services for those killed in Sri-Lanka.....just like they did with those killed in New Zealand?

    1. BubberMiley

      BubberMiley

      Are you still trying to use those events to prove something liars have told you about the media? They are all tragic and sad and the only side you need to take is the one against the murderers.

  13. Trudeau-supporting media trying to break up Conservative Alliance of Premiers by pitting one against the other?

    1. BubberMiley

      BubberMiley

      Even if you weren't just making this shit up, who cares?

  14. No, I can say why, to give me and others out there peace. If the number of complaints from Canadians, Europeans, Asians and so fourth goes through the roof for those nations.... I'll ask the same question I'm asking right now about those countries. I don't stand for any of those. Would religious fanatics want freedom of religion? I do. Would death cults want people to live? I do. Would a terrorist want people to be happy? I do.
  15. This is child abuse. This is healthy living. This is how we should be building subdivisions.
  16. Look at how happy these people after hearing that 3000 people had died. I want this kind of elation on everyone:
  17. I just want them to stop wearing their f@cking Medieval outfits in public. Is that too much to ask? I see it every week in the GTA. I have the right to be offended when those B@tchs walk by looking like the grim reaper. No proud Canadian should tolerate that crap.
  18. According to where I got it from.... well you know who already..... That is why I believe that without them, people like these children would be much happier. When have I ever used the word of God to justify what I have asked? All I want is to bring happiness to people world wide, God or no God. And I don't care about Israel.
  19. Because that will make a lot of people happy. I won't have to come across rants about how evil it is on Quora. I won't have to come across comments about how arrogant and stupid and fat they are on YouTube. These things won't have to happen anymore: I think they masturbate to the thought of America being destroyed and..... yeah.... I want to make them happy.
  20. The bigotry and ignorance is strong in this one.
  21. You think I'm extreme? Take a look at what our American Friends are suggesting. Ann Barnhardt has been advocating for Trump to give a 24 hour evacuation warning to two cities in Saudi Arabia. Then she wants them Nuked with a hydrogen bomb. I've listened to he radio interviews. She wants All Muslim countries to be given an Ultimatum. They must tear down their Mosques and Criminalize Islam, or we keep Nuking their cities until they give their complete surrender. Now I'm going to copy and paste her one page proposal. Here's the original source. https://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/12/11/how-a-sane-virile-leader-or-leaders-would-handle-the-musloid-problem How a Sane, Virile Leader or Leaders Would Handle the Musloid Problem THIS is how the musloid problem should be faced and solved. It isn’t difficult. 1. Formally declare islam a POLITICAL SYSTEM, and in no way a religion or falling under any religious protections whatsoever. 2. Criminalize islam in every form. 3. Formally recognize the islamic caliphate as a political entity. Define as Islamic Suzerainty ANY NATION that tolerates its existence or engages in any diplomatic negotiations or dialogue with any part of the Caliphate as defined above. (Man up, Switzerland.) 4. Declare war on the islamic caliphate and all of its Suzerainties. 5. Nuke Mecca and Medina to glass after generously, mercifully giving a 24 hour evacuation notice. 6. Seize and physically destroy every mosque in the homeland. 7. Arrest, intern and deport every musloid. Cancel the citizenship of those with citizenship. This was done with American citizens who were members of the German American Bund (American Nazi Party) during WWII. And yes, you’re damn right it was the morally correct thing to do. Read up HERE.) 8. Establish a quarantine on all majority islamic nations, shoot down all aircraft attempting to leave the airspace, excepting deportation aircraft returning for the next load of garbage. Intercept and tow back to port of origin all ships and boats attempting to leave any port. Build walls on all land borders with every inch within range of .50 cal sentry guns. 9. Send in the missionaries. Consecrate all formerly islamic lands to Jesus Christ the Sovereign King. Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Pray the Divine Office. Baptize every human being that asks for it. The rest will take care of itself. Agree or disagree on any of the above points, but understand that the gist of the solution is the following: Stop the spread. Contain them where they are. Use the only thing they understand – PHYSICAL FORCE AND STRENGTH. Aggressively proselytize. Fully acknowledge that even a converted musloid, like a domesticated wild animal, will be dangerous for the rest of his life and can never be fully trusted. Ann Barnhardt 11 December 2015 Feast of St. Damasus
  22. Hold on. I'll ask some Europeans opinion about this.
  23. This is why I'm warning conservatives not to vote for Bernier. I don't care if he calls himself conservative. No good politician comes form Quebec. The only politician from Quebec I like is Gilles Duceppe. He said he wanted to become Prime Minster so Quebec could separate. He said Quebec isn't better than Canada, They're just different, and we want to try having our own Country. Well good for him, If Quebec went their own way. It would be one less thing for us to worry about. We don't even speak the same language, but we're forced to listen to a translator half the time.
  24. F-35s deployed to the Middle East for the first time. Notice the longish two wheel roll-outs. Easier on the brakes. Shades of the B-58's landings of yore.
  25. I can't even recall exactly it was so long ago. I suppose it'll surface in some sort of affirming and empowering MeToo movement for Islamophobes one day. Better not run for public office I guess. It's amazing how thin someone's skin can get when you mock their hilariously single-minded grasp of history. Can you slander people?
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...