Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums

hot enough

Members
  • Content Count

    4,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by hot enough

  1. Interesting. Of all the countries in the world, only three backwaters still use the archaic Imperial system of weights and measures: Liberia. Myanmar (a.k.a. “the country formerly known as Burma”) United States of America. http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/08/13/countries-that-dont-use-the-metric-system/
  2. They haven't figured out a way to have their propaganda admit that the USA is the world's leading terrorist nation/gang. And who is the leading arms maker/arms seller in the world? None other than the USofA, bigger than the next two countries put together. This would be the kind, benevolent, peace loving USA that has been in a state of war for 93% of its years as a "country".
  3. Yup, Malaysia held a war crimes tribunal that found Bush/Blair guilty of war crimes. As if a trial was even needed for that. That will go in the Evil USA thread.
  4. Isn't it odd how propagandists point fingers and make a big deal about people choosing to block some users on the very US social media that has procedures in place to allow such blocking? Can these propagandists even spell hypocrisy? Which raises the question: Why is the USA still continuing its terrorism against Cuba, Syria, Ukraine, ... but controlling the US propaganda machinery to hide this from the world?
  5. You are absolutely right, Altai. How can you be so well informed and sooooooo many of these open-minded Westerners be soooo dismally ignorant of US terrorist acts that have been going on for well over a century. Did you know that the USA Senate in the late 1970s tried to pass a law against international terrorism but every one they wrote was shot down by lawyers who said the USA had done all these terrorist acts? Aren't they the world's biggest hypocrites? If you added all countries hypocrisy together the USA would still beat them by a country mile!!
  6. You should address this to all the USGOCT conspiracy theorists who pretend they believe the most phantasmagorical US government lies instead of using their dog given brains to think.
  7. It doesn't matter what you explain, you don't possess the knowledge to make these wild guesses. I am truly puzzled as to how you seem totally unable to make logical connections. Thermite/thermate/nanothermite had no legal/legitimate reason to be at WTC, no legal/legitimate reason to be in WTC dust. You continue to make the incredibly illogical assumption that there were planes, the planes alleged by the USGOCT and that there were Arab hijackers. The nanothermite, which was used to demolish the twin towers and WTC7 means there were no hijackers. You don't appear to possess what is necessary to do anything more than offer a layman's suspicion. The twin towers were designed for a high speed hit by a 707/DC10. You yourself described the impossible collapse of the twin towers, which violated Newton's Laws of Motion. A free fall of WTC7 is also impossible. Ergo, controlled demolitions, ergo, no hijackers.
  8. Then why does the USA always so hypocritically demand that "war criminals" except for the worst ones on the planet in viciousness and scope, US war criminals, be held to account. Why are you you being so hypocritical? Why are you defending the myriad US war crimes and terrorism that has seen so many tens of millions slaughtered by unfeeling, brutal, vicious US Nazis? Here is just such an evil, brutal, vicious US Nazi USAF WWII commander, Curtis Lemay, aptly named by Wikiquote as Curtis Lemay aka Dick head Lemay (USAF).jpg "Killing Japanese didn't bother me very much at that time... I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.... Every soldier thinks something of the moral aspects of what he is doing. But all war is immoral and if you let that bother you, you're not a good soldier."
  9. Not everything. You are going to ludicrous extremes to make a ludicrous argument. Only the war crimes are war crimes. Why do you do this? What you are trying to justify is that Nazis Germany was justified for doing what they did because war is hell and whatever needs to be done in the eyes of those leaders needs to be done. The war crimes that the US committed are the same war crimes that many people of the Axis powers were tried and hung for. The US established at Nuremberg the principle of the "poisoned chalice". Whatever crimes the Nazis/Japanese/Italians/... were being tried for, the same poisoned chalice had to be handed to US/western lips. It never was, for US/UK WWII war crimes or for any since, crimes much much more egregious than the Nazis. Unfortunately, the nature of these crimes is such that both prosecution and judgment must be by victor nations over vanquished foes. The worldwide scope of the aggressions carried out by these men has left but few real neutrals. Either the victors must judge the vanquished or we must leave the defeated to judge themselves. After the first World War, we learned the futility of the latter course. The former high station of these defendants, the notoriety of their acts, and the adaptability of their conduct to provoke retaliation make it hard to distinguish between the demand for a just and measured retribution, and the unthinking cry for vengeance which arises from the anguish of war. It is our task, so far as humanly possible, to, draw the line between the two. We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well. We must summon such detachment and intellectual integrity to our task that this Trial will commend itself to posterity as fulfilling humanity's aspirations to do justice. - Robert H Jackson https://www.roberthjackson.org/speech-and-writing/opening-statement-before-the-international-military-tribunal/
  10. You are wrong again, about this and about the wing tips being able to slice thru 14" steel box columns. It was impossible for Arab hijackers to access nanothermite. Why do you ignore this? It was impossible for Arab hijackers to suspend Newton's Laws of Motion. Why do you ignore this? It was impossible for Arab hijackers to have melted/vaporized steel, melted molybdenum, vaporized lead, created iron microspheres that amounted to 6% of WTC dust. Why do you ignore this? It was impossible for Arab hijackers to cause WTC7 to fall at free fall speed. Why do you ignore this? Why do you ignore these and all the other myriad impossibilities?
  11. Are you pretending to offer this up as some sort of evidence for the USGOCT after your terribly dismal showing on the Windsor Tower? If so, what do you regard as evidence?
  12. You appear to be as dishonest as all the other USGOCT conspiracy theorists. You are pointedly ignoring all the absolutely impossible things the alleged hijackers could not have done in favor of these, above, totally silly comments.
  13. Remember what you wrote? You said it, it has to be true? Why do you pretend to be an expert when you are not? You don't explain how the wing, which has already disappeared into WTC2 without damaging the outside face but microseconds later, the building has a roadrunner image of an airplane. When there is nothing to have done the damage.
  14. I wrote: It is impossible for the wing tips to slice thru 14" steel box columns. Thinkinoutsidethebox said: Didn't have to, but could bust glass without a problem. This photograph says you are wrong. The wingtips performed another 911 USGOCT miracle, they went thru 14" steel box columns.
  15. Not "it', many total impossibilities that you are, for some strange reason totally avoiding.
  16. You have just described a potential scenario for the planes that purportedly hit the twin towers. But it is no optical illusion. The face is as smooth as it was on September 10 and then microseconds later a jagged mess.
  17. There is no need. This is only one of the myriad total impossibilities you haven't dealt with/addressed that make the USGOCT an impossible fable.
  18. You have their analysis in the link I quoted which is more than enough for you to work with.
  19. You have to look at the picture. The wing between the fuselage and the engine has entered the building. There is no portion of the wing between the fuselage and the engine still outside the building yet the building face is totally intact, showing no damage. It is impossible for the wing tips to slice thru 14" steel box columns.
  20. USGOCT = United States Government Official Conspiracy Theory You don't say how "your aircraft argument falls flat on it's[sic] face". The USGOCT falls flat on its face because UA175 wasn't the plane that hit WTC2. How does this escape you? The plane that hit WTC2 wasn't UA175. How does this keep escaping you? Both illegal invasions of the sovereign nations, I and A, were premised on this gigantic 911 lie.
  21. I think he is so great. Loved the canadaland article! I am so effin' happy that I got introduced to Gab McInnes by a MLW ad. My life will never be the same.
  22. That always happens to you folks when you find yourself up a stump, which is pretty much always. You, yourself, don't even know what "wet" means. It was a quick grab that failed miserably.
  23. I agree, this does happen. Why? Because people often use these acts as reasons why we holier than thou westerners have some totally unexplained divine right to murder and mayhem in others countries. You folks are big on the justifiable revenge angle but you never have any proof for it. In point of fact, you know you are repeating gross propaganda. How do we know this is the case? Because you have provided no evidence or examples at all of what you are taking about. Notice how this is always the case with you folks, nebulous accusations with no evidence, proof, examples.
×
×
  • Create New...