Jump to content
Political Discussion Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Abies

  1. We shouldn't but inherent biases on the employers part means other measures need to be taken. Just because we didn't have a historical injury in the past doesn't mean that no issue exists today. As Mr.Incredible would say, "Math is Math." Canada admits plenty of skilled immigrants from third world countries, it is the bias of employers that think standards are higher here. Quite the contradiction. Except inherent biases on the hiring side tends to override merit. And as I just posted the definition of racism, hiring minorities to balance the make up of governmen
  2. That would be ideal but that is really not the case. We are currently in the year 2020. The make up of Canada in the 1970's has no bearing on today. You are making a very broad generalization here. Racism most certainly exists in Canada. It is to counter the bias that minorities are not qualified for these positions because they are not white men. You need to look up the definition of racism:
  3. https://munkschool.utoronto.ca/canadian-companies-still-struggling-to-overcome-hiring-bias-against-minorities/
  4. Affirmative action does not say let someone who failed math into a math degree or a position where one is required. It says that when you have two equally qualified people, preference should be given to minority or women in order to tackle discrimination against those groups. Claiming people should be hired based on merits is good and all but it does nothing to deal with the inherent bias people have against minority groups and women. Funny how when wanting to hire more women and people from minority groups people always insinuate that they aren't qualified.
  5. "Among Canadians aged 25 to 64 with postsecondary qualifications, 81.4% were graduates in fields important for building a strong social infrastructure, such as education, communications, justice, health and others. Contributing to the advancement of Canada's science and technology competitiveness, 18.6% of working-age Canadians with postsecondary qualifications graduated from science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields." https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/171129/dq171129a-eng.htm
  6. What evidence is there that hiring women and minority groups has led to a decline in the quality of education in Canada?
  7. Quoting scientists is fine and the IPCC is based on the science performed by those scientists in which they are 95% certain that humans are the dominant cause. Science does not give 100% certainty. Majority of emissions in Canada is by the way we live not industry. We certainly have a choice in how much we produce. There are many means in which to deal with goods from places that do not follow good environmental practices. The climate change crowd have the backing of science. And anything relating to major policy changes which AGW requires is going to be politicized.
  8. No it's actually pretty clear that human activity is the cause of the current warming. https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us-basic.htm Carbon taxes are something economists have been pushing as being more effective at curbing carbon emissions. Also pointing fingers at others does not absolve one of their responsibility. You missed the point. Climate change deniers and holocaust deniers aren't interested in academic/scientific rigour. They want to espouse a certain view.
  9. The military spending issue is something Liberals and Conservatives have failed on.
  10. The problem as we can see here is that arguing with deniers makes them think their ideas are on the same level as a scientist who studies the topic. It's no different than arguing with Holocaust deniers and Armenian genocide deniers. They aren't interested in coming to a consensus academically. They simply want a platform to disseminate their lies as widely as possible to convince as many people as possible. It's political not scientific.
  11. The hockey stick graph has not been debunked since other studies have supported Mann's findings. He has lost one case due to delay. The merits of each side has not been heard or ruled upon. the others are still working it's way through the system.
  12. So far denialists have failed to produce any evidence for their claims that AGW is not real.
  13. In other words the procurement process is a mess as I said.
  14. Military procurement needs to be redone so gaining new and better equipment is done rapidly but no party really seems interested in tackling the issue.
  15. I found these resources to be quite fascinating and very good for starting on different topics in history. https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/
  16. Emergency powers gives the government the power to ignore agreements and rights.
  17. You mean they don't make hypothesis and a test such as they do in the sciences so in your mind that invalidates anything the humanities have to say. Except there is no way to quantify culture in a way that is testable. Here is my citation: http://shc.stanford.edu/why-do-humanities-matter, http://shc.stanford.edu/how-humanities-research-conducted
  18. They do. Researching human experiences all over the world furthers our understanding of the societies they inhabit.
  19. It isn't universities jobs to make people job ready. That is the job for the person choosing to go to university. Also if we are going to attack humanities I'd like to point out plenty of the Sciences do not translate to a job as well.
  20. None of the evidence has been tried because he took a plea deal after being tortured and his rights violated by Canada. There was no proof offered to the court because there was never a chance to do so when he took a plea deal.
  21. That arrangement would leave the central provinces at the mercy to provinces with access to bodies of water for shipping.
  22. You are making a lot of baseless assumptions on my views and positions. Quite telling you are relying on a red herring as an argument rather than countering my points.
  23. No I didn't remove it from context you are simply cherry picking to fit your world view. I have already showed you your own sources do not agree with you. You are just arguing in bad faith.
  24. The problem is that there hasn't been any evidence that he threw the grenade. The evidence has never been tried in the court of law.
  • Create New...